# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
#
# Usage:
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users View list of users and latest twt date.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt View all twts.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri View all mentions for uri.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash View all twts for a conversation subject.
#
# Options:
# uri Filter to show a specific users twts.
# offset Start index for quey.
# limit Count of items to return (going back in time).
#
# twt range = 1 2159
# self = https://watcher.sour.is?uri=https://f.adi.onl/user/adi/twtxt.txt&offset=2159
# prev = https://watcher.sour.is?uri=https://f.adi.onl/user/adi/twtxt.txt&offset=2059
@prologic Not sure, I don't have Go experience.
Plan9 mk solution:
fs={find . -type f ! -name '*.gz'}
gzs=${fs:%=%.gz}
all:V: $gzs
clean:
rm -rf *.gz
%.gz: %
gzip -c < $prereq > $prereq.gz
@fastidious I'm not going to edit photos on my phone now. Not interested in winning or losing.
@fastidious That's what friends are for, lol, killing them.
@fastidious I agree with that, I just don't want to use it everywhere except optionally on the client side.
@thecanine Lol man, I would send you a gazillion €s, my card only has 0.15 € lol.
Ok, guys a 10 € would be nice!
Hey man, long time no read! What sort of problems if you're ok with sharing?
Also, I vote in favor of keeping it simple, leave it as plain links, no drop down.
@prologic
> Add support for Edit/Delete everywhere
So no removing of Delete last twt, but Edit/Delete any twt?
Have no idea how to make it portable tho.
%.gz: %
gzip -c $< > $<.gz
Doesn't work with BSD make.
@stackeffect I guess this works with subdirectories also:
SRCFILES != find . -type f ! -name '*.gz'
DSTFILES = $(addsuffix .gz, $(SRCFILES))
%.gz: %
gzip -c $< > $<.gz
all: $(DSTFILES)
@meff I can populate the list, I can't map files to the compressed version.
I could separate them in single targets, but the actual file list will be dynamic.
Make sense make would do that. Because a.txt is prerequisite of all other archives as well.
My problem is that when I edit a single file, let's say a.txt, all 3 archives are recreated.
@meff I would like to compress a list of files. For each file, create a corresponding .gz file. This is where I am:
all: a.txt.gz b.gz c.gz
a.txt.gz b.gz c.gz: a.txt b c
gzip < ${*:R} > $*
It's BSD make, but you get the idea.
Who can answer me a Makefile question?
@darch What did you take from default.css?
@lyse Regarding my setup, yes, I feel happy about it. I was actually asking for stuff you work on. Maybe there's something cool there.
@lyse Where were your git repositories?
@fastidious I guess you could convert the html back to Markdown?
Not sure if I'll change it.
@movq They're not the same size in code. 😁 Guess it's the mix of uppercase/lowercase that makes it seem they're the same size.
I feel pretty happy not using git to be honest, I just have a cron that does backups frequently enough of my home directory.
@stigatle I remember reading about it, it's super rare, right?
@jlj Changed his website! Crap, hardware failure. Happened to me also this summer. Lost everything. Had backups. Took a while to get everything back up.
@thecanine Yeah, somebody commented on YouTube with
> MURICA
Yeah, looks pretty good. However I took a look if it also provides a mainboard replacement, like https://frame.work does. That would have been even cooler.
I played with replacing bin/mkws with a Makefile. https://clbin.com/NZWb1 (just a small example) You could migrate if regenerating everything takes too much time.
@fastidious These are the usual discussions when it comes to BSD vs GPL. What license do you agree with?
I'm a big fan of pixel art! 😃
@thecanine Happy birthday! Cool glasses! Avatar even cooler tho! 🥳
@prologic
> There is no way to protect the Pod Owner/Operators and end users if the software behind Yarn.social is MIT licensed IHMO
Protect them from what, I don't understand.
@eldersnake Classical GPL vs BSD arguments. I usually agree with this statement:
> Allowing someone to make a proprietary product is objectively giving someone more freedom with what they can do with it, no matter how many ways said derivative disrespects freedom
I just read "envy", I believe every writer respects a good reader. 😋
Other guys around here mentioned it.
@fastidious Tbh, I wasn't aware of "libre" as a buzzword yet.
Basically a stream with all twts in the twtverse? Is it possible?
@prologic Can you use all feeds discovered by that bot, forgot his name and create a stream with all twts in real time or as real time as possible, for discoverability purposes?
I can explain how to set-up busybox with it.
Wrong, hugo does generate a sitemap.xml, I'll have to add it back.
> Therefore, you have
certain responsibilities if you distribute copies of the software, or if
you modify it: responsibilities to respect the freedom of others.
**or if you modify it**
> For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether
gratis or for a fee, you must pass on to the recipients the same
freedoms
May be just an example?
I believe if mkws would be released GPL, you would be all required to release changes.
@eldersnake Didn't notice that. Maybe you can file a bug report. Anyway, I prefer it due to it being lighter.
@prologic I'm not saying it's bad, I'm saying I have no option to say "no". I'm **required** by the license to release my modifications. In the case of a BSD license I get to **choose** whether I release the source code or not. BSD licenses are permissive.
@eldersnake Would be nice if. Makes sense. That's the usual argument for GPL/AGPL. I could argue that a BSD license however favors adoption because it's less restrictive.
@laz
> Mastodon is open source
... licensed as AGPL which requires to release any modifications, yarn is also open source, but MIT, which don't require to release changes. Just to make things clear.
@prologic Ha, I was aware of not needing to store the email address when @fastidious asked about that.
I remember older guys in my highschool playing Travian tho.
@prologic Would be nice if. What are you doing on Discord?
Tbh @prologic I believe it's a good idea to keep the MIT license in the spirit of simplicity.
I _personally_ don't believe modifying my software and not releasing the source code counts as ruined.
I'm watching ColdFusion on YouTube.
@laz Yes as far as I understand the GPL license! You're not required to do that under a BSD license (MIT as yarn is, ISC).
What do you mean by ruined?
_Personally_, _I_ wouldn't mind if TRUTH took my code and didn't release source code.
@eldersnake I understand not releasing the source is a breach of the AGPL license, wouldn't be it were BSD. Other abuse? Did I misunderstand?
r