# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
#
# Usage:
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users View list of users and latest twt date.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt View all twts.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri View all mentions for uri.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash View all twts for a conversation subject.
#
# Options:
# uri Filter to show a specific users twts.
# offset Start index for quey.
# limit Count of items to return (going back in time).
#
# twt range = 1 21
# self = https://watcher.sour.is/conv/2giomoq
@zags i guess not, since the hash is calculated from the content of the post
@darch Your reply used a completely wrong mention. 🤔 What happened here? 😅
@darch Your reply used a completely wrong mention. 🤔 What happened here? 😅
@darch Your reply used a completely wrong mention. 🤔 What happened here? 😅
@darch Your reply used a completely wrong mention. 🤔 What happened here? 😅
@movq I think the webclient on my phone "cookie jar'ed" that mention. We need to find a way to clear the postbox so prefilled text is not carries over from difference view. Right now it seem to just store whatever. @prologic or others, do you have any idea how to fix this?
@darch Yes we need to fix this 🤣 It's really annoying 🤦♂️
@darch Yes we need to fix this 🤣 It's really annoying 🤦♂️
@darch Yes we need to fix this 🤣 It's really annoying 🤦♂️
@darch Yes we need to fix this 🤣 It's really annoying 🤦♂️
@darch the content is stored in localStorage.
What I also noticed is when you open a Nick the post is ready to reply to him. This should be true only if I want to write to them.
Maybe mentioning like with yarns and forks using the prefix if not already manually written can be a solution?
@prologic yes, somehow we can.
The main issue is the appended user in the standard message storage, it can be handled with a hidden field like in yarns. What do you think?
@justamoment I think we can do that! Better to avoid JS if we can? 🤔
@justamoment I think we can do that! Better to avoid JS if we can? 🤔
@justamoment I think we can do that! Better to avoid JS if we can? 🤔
@justamoment I think we can do that! Better to avoid JS if we can? 🤔
@prologic it'll be more reliable since it can be used with JS disabled and via API.