# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
# 
# Usage:
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users              View list of users and latest twt date.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt                View all twts.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri  View all mentions for uri.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash         View all twts for a conversation subject.
# 
# Options:
#     uri     Filter to show a specific users twts.
#     offset  Start index for quey.
#     limit   Count of items to return (going back in time).
# 
# twt range = 1 8
# self = https://watcher.sour.is/conv/kv5m3ya
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@bender To be fair it _really_ isn't sha256sum vs. b2sum. Neither is more complicated than the other.
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@bender To be fair it _really_ isn't sha256sum vs. b2sum. Neither is more complicated than the other.
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
e.g:


$ printf "%s\t%s\t%s" "https://example.com/twtxt.txt" "2024-09-29T13:30:00Z" "Hello World!" | sha256sum | awk '{ print $1 }' | xxd -r -p | base64 | head -c 12
UWVFdUXtvoLS
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
e.g:


$ printf "%s\t%s\t%s" "https://example.com/twtxt.txt" "2024-09-29T13:30:00Z" "Hello World!" | sha256sum | awk '{ print $1 }' | xxd -r -p | base64 | head -c 12
UWVFdUXtvoLS
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
e.g:


$ printf "%s\\t%s\\t%s" "https://example.com/twtxt.txt" "2024-09-29T13:30:00Z" "Hello World!" | sha256sum | awk '{ print $1 }' | xxd -r -p | base64 | head -c 12
UWVFdUXtvoLS
bender
twtxt.net
View Thread
@prologic is base64 more desirable than base32? I noticed I get alphanumeric replacing base64 with base32.
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@bender Nope not at all. base64 just encodes more bits
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@bender Nope not at all. base64 just encodes more bits