# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
#
# Usage:
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users View list of users and latest twt date.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt View all twts.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri View all mentions for uri.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash View all twts for a conversation subject.
#
# Options:
# uri Filter to show a specific users twts.
# offset Start index for quey.
# limit Count of items to return (going back in time).
#
# twt range = 1 17
# self = https://watcher.sour.is/conv/oknfufq
@andros Do edits cause problems? I sometimes make them and didn't realize it may be an issue
@andros Do edits cause problems? I sometimes make them and didn't realize it may be an issue
How do you edit? What steps do you follow?
How do you edit? What steps do you follow?
@bmallred Any edit automatically changes the twt hash, because the hash is built over the hash URL, message timestamp and message text. https://twtxt.dev/exts/twt-hash.html So, it is only a problem, if somebody replied to your original message with the old hash. The original message suddenly doesn't exist anymore and the reply becomes detached, orphaned, whatever you wanna call it. Threading doesn't break, though, if nobody replied to your message.
@andros Oh, this system has an edit button so I can just update the twt as needed. It's a custom implementation so just kind of through it in when I was building it out.
@andros Oh, this system has an edit button so I can just update the twt as needed. It's a custom implementation so just kind of through it in when I was building it out.
@andros Oh, this system has an edit button so I can just update the twt as needed. It's a custom implementation so just kind of through it in when I was building it out.
@lyse Gotcha. That makes sense. Doesn't hurt the systems but definitely can break the thread.
@lyse Gotcha. That makes sense. Doesn't hurt the systems but definitely can break the thread.
@lyse Gotcha. That makes sense. Doesn't hurt the systems but definitely can break the thread.
@bmallred I forgot one more effect of edits. If clients remember the read status of massages by hash, an edit will mark the updated message as unread again. To some degree that is even the right behavior, because the message was updated, so the user might want to have a look at the updated version. On the other hand, if it's just a small typo fix, it's maybe not worth to tell the user about. But the client doesn't know, at least not with additional logic.
Having said that, it appears that this only affects me personally, noone else. I don't know of any other client that saves read statuses. But don't worry about me, all good. Just keep doing what you've done so far. I wanted to mention that only for the sake of completeness. :-)
@lyse i appreciate you updating this with that info. been in the weeds at work so haven't been tracking the conversation here much. let me sit on this for a bit because often times the edits are within seconds of first post so maybe maybe i just allow them within a certain time frame or do away with them all together. i really only do it because it bugs me once i notice the typo :)
@lyse i appreciate you updating this with that info. been in the weeds at work so haven't been tracking the conversation here much. let me sit on this for a bit because often times the edits are within seconds of first post so maybe maybe i just allow them within a certain time frame or do away with them all together. i really only do it because it bugs me once i notice the typo :)
@lyse i appreciate you updating this with that info. been in the weeds at work so haven't been tracking the conversation here much. let me sit on this for a bit because often times the edits are within seconds of first post so maybe maybe i just allow them within a certain time frame or do away with them all together. i really only do it because it bugs me once i notice the typo :)