Now guess what manufacturers are pushing for ...
Now guess who couldn't complete a task at work this Saturday morning, because a certain cloud service was down ...
IT is fucked. Throw it all away and start over.
Now guess what manufacturers are pushing for ...
Now guess who couldn't complete a task at work this Saturday morning, because a certain cloud service was down ...
IT is fucked. Throw it all away and start over.
https://cbers4asat.readthedocs.io/pt-br/latest/
cc @elmoneto@elmoneto (você viu isso? eu não manjo nada mas já fiquei animado...)
https://movq.de/v/9df0437d27/MVI_8891.MOV.mp4
Now everything looks like it has that silly slogan as a background image:
https://movq.de/v/9df0437d27/smol.jpg
https://umapenca.com/villares (BR)
#Python #CreativeCoding #Processing #py5 #TShirt #GenerativeArt #SupportArtists
white T-shirt with abstract geometric pattern made of recursively placed unfilled black stroke hexagons and lines
Não é um tema de que saiba muito para conseguir musicar apropriadamente, mas julgo que a "Fuel for Fire" dos #Metallica não fica mal:
https://youtu.be/PvF9PAxe5Ng
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-RX1GT4GT0
https://andros.dev/texudus.txt, its url doesn't correspond to the feed either
/^([-_\p{N}\p{L}])+$/iu because i don't like how english-centric only allowing ascii letters/numbers is though this only applies to local users as of now, currently all nicknames are tolerated when parsing remote feeds and i just do mentions how yarn does (just the feed url)in the wild, i've noticed a texedus feed with spaces in the nick (where its spec explicitly disallows whitespace in the nick) and feeds with other symbols in the nick too. honestly, i think we should just tolerate arbitrary nicknames for sake of user expression (while stripping or converting unreasonable characters) and just leave them out of mentions
Maybe it *does* look horribly pixelated and super ugly to other people, and that’s why everyone prefers smoothed fonts and UIs and all that … ? 😂
@<nick url>. If the next token after the @<nick does not look like a URL, it's not a mention but regular text. This is just wild guessing, though.Looking at the regex and tests in the original twtxt reference implementation seems to confirm that theory in the sense as it relies on whitespace as the delimiter:
https://lyse.isobeef.org/tmp/screenshot-2025-09-17-21-30-25.png
Another thing about nicks is that the original twtxt reference implementation converts nicks to all lowercase:
https://lyse.isobeef.org/tmp/screenshot-2025-09-17-21-20-39.png
You probably know this already, the original twtxt file format specification can be found here: https://twtxt.readthedocs.io/en/latest/user/twtxtfile.html
As for extensions, I don't know of anything outside of twtxt.dev that has actually been (partially) implemented. However, there is also the issue tracker of the official reference implementation. You might wanna dig through that. For example, there is an alternative suggestions of multiline messages: https://github.com/buckket/twtxt/issues/157
https://sudokupad.app/adventure/94-advvvvvvvven
I’m glad I eventually got it right. 🥴
(via https://dosgame.club/@Tijn/115221132694421937)
https://twtxt.dev/exts/metadata.html#nick
It doesn’t say much. 🤔
In the wild, I’ve only seen “traditional” nick names, i.e. ASCII 0x21 thru 0x7E.
My client removes anything but
r'[a-zA-Z0-9]' from nick names.
nicks? i remember reading somewhere whitespace should not be allowed, but i don't see it in the spec on twtxt.dev — in fact, are there any other resources on twtxt extensions outside of twtxt.dev?
Oxalis corniculata is growing and blossoming on my strawberries vase, giving it some unplanned color
You can also donate a ticket so that a student can attend!
#PythonBrasil2025
Python Brasil banner with QR codes for registration and the sponsorship information.
If users choose a client which supports the extensions, they don't have to mess around with v1 and v2 hashing, just like today.
As for the school of thought, personally, I'd prefer something else, too. I'm in camp location-based addressing, or whatever it is called. There more I think about it, a complete redesign of twtxt and its extensions would be necessary in my opinion. Retrofitting has its limits. Of course, this is much more work, though.
yarnd does have a well documented API and two clients (CLI and unmaintained Flutter App)
@davidgerard@davidgerard https://circumstances.run/@davidgerard/115210866167925508
regular end users wont care to understand how twt hashes are formed, they just want to use twtxt! so i guess i could work in protecting users from themselves by disallowing post edits on old posts or posts with replies, but i'm not fond of this either really. if they want to break a thread, they can just delete the post (though i've noticed yarn handling post deletes dubiously...)
on activitypub i do genuinely find myself looking through several month or even year old posts sometimes and deciding to edit/reword them a little to be slightly less confusing, this should be trivial to handle on twtxt which is an infinitely simpler specification
nick is nick bc it is parsed as a nickname just for the instance, though calling it instance_nick would probably be less confusing
Yellow orange clouds
{
"nick": "Example",
"description": "alice's twtxt instance!",
"host": "twtxt.example.com",
"admin": "alice"
}
Would it make more sense changing
nick to instance_name or similar? Usually nick is reserved for users, like here, quark. Right? Also, is host the same FQDN to be used while proxying traffic to the application? That is, using the above configuration, it's Caddy configuration would be:
twtxt.example.com {
encode
reverse_proxy :31212
}
Is that correct?
grep -v git at the end, so my repo is still in working order. Phew. I wish find had grep-like --exclude-dir and --exclude options (or the include variants) instead of its own weird options that I never can remember and combine properly.
Well, breaking threads on edits is considered a feature by some people. I reckon the only approach to reasonably deal with that property is to carefully review messages before publishing them, thus delaying feed updates. Any typos etc., that have been discovered afterwards, are just left alone. That's what I and some others do. I only risk editing if the feed has been published very few seconds earlier. More than 20 seconds and I just ignore it. Works alright for the most part.