grep and a text editor. @adi wrote a suite of command line tools for analyzing different web server log formats if you're interested: fl, cl, and cbl
Never mind, I just realized it's
gqqq, not qqqq
Also, check out the hash of the parent twt. Quads!
Am I missing any time zones of video call regulars? Is 07:00:00-23:00:00 a reasonable window?
Am I missing any time zones of video call regulars? Is 07:00:00-23:00:00 a reasonable window?
yarnd changed it (correctly) to yarn.stigatle.no. I edited the message and escaped the @s.
yarnd auto-expand is confused. I always add the correct domain to my posts to avoid this.
yarnd auto-expand is confused. I always add the correct domain to my posts to avoid this.
yarnd auto-expand is confused. I always add the correct domain to my posts to avoid this.
* "Easy self-hosting" platforms and why most of them are terrible
* @prologic opening upGoNix
* RSS in 2022
* Sending an SMS message over e-mail
* Swap space
* TempleOS
* "Easy self-hosting" platforms and why most of them are terrible
* @prologic opening up GoNix
* RSS in 2022
* Sending an SMS message over e-mail
* Swap space
* TempleOS
Also, Firefox doesn't seem to like the yuv444p pixel format, at least not in this particular case. I can't pass up an opportunity to use ffmpeg, so here's a yuv420p version that Firefox will play: 360p H.264 yuv420p [11.1 MiB]\n[11.1 MiB]\n[11.1 MiB]\n[11.1 MiB]\n
Also, Firefox doesn't seem to like the yuv444p pixel format, at least not in this particular case. I can't pass up an opportunity to use ffmpeg, so here's a yuv420p version that Firefox will play: 360p H.264 yuv420p [11.1 MiB]
Also, Firefox doesn't seem to like the yuv444p pixel format, at least not in this particular case. I can't pass up an opportunity to use ffmpeg, so here's a yuv420p version that Firefox will play: 360p H.264 yuv420p \n\n\n\n
Also, Firefox doesn't seem to like the yuv444p pixel format, at least not in this particular case. I can't pass up an opportunity to use ffmpeg, so here's a yuv420p version that Firefox will play: 360p H.264 yuv420p [11.1 MiB][11.1 MiB=]=
Also, Firefox doesn't seem to like the yuv444p pixel format, at least not in this particular case. I can't pass up an opportunity to use ffmpeg, so here's a yuv420p version that Firefox will play: 360p H.264 yuv420p \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Also, Firefox doesn't seem to like the yuv444p pixel format, at least not in this particular case. I can't pass up an opportunity to use ffmpeg, so here's a yuv420p version that Firefox will play: 360p H.264 yuv420p [11.1 MiB]
Also, Firefox doesn't seem to like the yuv444p pixel format, at least not in this particular case. I can't pass up an opportunity to use ffmpeg, so here's a yuv420p version that Firefox will play: 360p H.264 yuv420p [11.1 MiB][11.1 MiB][11.1 MiB][11.1 MiB][11.1 MiB][11.1 MiB][11.1 MiB][11.1 MiB]
Also, Firefox doesn't seem to like the yuv444p pixel format, at least not in this particular case. I can't pass up an opportunity to use ffmpeg, so here's a yuv420p version that Firefox will play: 360p H.264 yuv420p [11.1 MiB][11.1 MiB=][11.1 MiB][11.1 MiB=][11.1 MiB][11.1 MiB=][11.1 MiB][11.1 MiB=]
Also, Firefox doesn't seem to like the yuv444p pixel format, at least not in this particular case. I can't pass up an opportunity to use ffmpeg, so here's a yuv420p version that Firefox will play: 360p H.264 yuv420p \n\n
dmesg suggests the problem occurs when Nouveau takes over the framebuffer console. I'll ask about it on the Gentoo forum next time I have a few hours to spend on this.
Image of Super Weenie Hut Jr's
How much could you download with 20 minutes of internet access? I could (theoretically) download 150 gigabytes.
How much could you download with 20 minutes of internet access? I could (theoretically) download 150 gigabytes.
Jim Halpert smiling through the blinds
Jim Halpert smiling through the blinds
That's different than a button to share something to a microblog.
Really, this is an unfair test because of
yarnd's markup issues.
Really, this is an unfair test because of
yarnd's markup issues.
Really, this is an unfair test because of
yarnd's markup issues.
Really, this is an unfair test because of
yarnd's markup issues.
twtxt.net's Discover page viewed in Ladybird
> ...I don’t agree with the narrative of Microsoft trying to make things harder to do to keep you in their ecosystem...
Microsoft is leveraging their position as the vendor of your operating system to manipulate you into using their Web browser. I hope they pay dearly for this, but I doubt they will.
I shared a video I found that goes through this, and I had a little bit too much fun with ffmpeg so it's available in three formats.
* Original 720p H.264/AAC [93.8 MiB][93.8 MiB=]
* 720p H.265/AAC [33.1 MiB][33.1 MiB=]
* 480p VP9/Opus [36.4 MiB][36.4 MiB=]*=
> ...I don’t agree with the narrative of Microsoft trying to make things harder to do to keep you in their ecosystem...
Microsoft is leveraging their position as the vendor of your operating system to manipulate you into using their Web browser. I hope they pay dearly for this, but I doubt they will.
I shared a video I found that goes through this, and I had a little bit too much fun with ffmpeg so it's available in three formats.
* Original 720p H.264/AAC [93.8 MiB][93.8 MiB=][93.8 MiB][93.8 MiB=][93.8 MiB][93.8 MiB=][93.8 MiB][93.8 MiB=]
* 720p H.265/AAC [33.1 MiB][33.1 MiB=][33.1 MiB][33.1 MiB=][33.1 MiB][33.1 MiB=][33.1 MiB][33.1 MiB=]
* 480p VP9/Opus [36.4 MiB][36.4 MiB=][36.4 MiB][36.4 MiB=][36.4 MiB][36.4 MiB=][36.4 MiB][36.4 MiB=]*
> ...I don’t agree with the narrative of Microsoft trying to make things harder to do to keep you in their ecosystem...
Microsoft is leveraging their position as the vendor of your operating system to manipulate you into using their Web browser. I hope they pay dearly for this, but I doubt they will.
I shared a video I found that goes through this, and I had a little bit too much fun with ffmpeg so it's available in three formats.
* Original 720p H.264/AAC \n\n
* 720p H.265/AAC \n\n
* 480p VP9/Opus \n\n*
> ...I don’t agree with the narrative of Microsoft trying to make things harder to do to keep you in their ecosystem...
Microsoft is leveraging their position as the vendor of your operating system to manipulate you into using their Web browser. I hope they pay dearly for this, but I doubt they will.
I shared a video I found that goes through this, and I had a little bit too much fun with ffmpeg so it's available in three formats.
* Original 720p H.264/AAC [93.8 MiB][93.8 MiB][93.8 MiB][93.8 MiB][93.8 MiB][93.8 MiB][93.8 MiB][93.8 MiB]
* 720p H.265/AAC [33.1 MiB][33.1 MiB][33.1 MiB][33.1 MiB][33.1 MiB][33.1 MiB][33.1 MiB][33.1 MiB]
* 480p VP9/Opus [36.4 MiB][36.4 MiB][36.4 MiB][36.4 MiB][36.4 MiB][36.4 MiB][36.4 MiB][36.4 MiB]*
> ...I don’t agree with the narrative of Microsoft trying to make things harder to do to keep you in their ecosystem...
Microsoft is leveraging their position as the vendor of your operating system to manipulate you into using their Web browser. I hope they pay dearly for this, but I doubt they will.
I shared a video I found that goes through this, and I had a little bit too much fun with ffmpeg so it's available in three formats.
* Original 720p H.264/AAC [93.8 MiB]
* 720p H.265/AAC [33.1 MiB]
* 480p VP9/Opus [36.4 MiB]*
> ...I don’t agree with the narrative of Microsoft trying to make things harder to do to keep you in their ecosystem...
Microsoft is leveraging their position as the vendor of your operating system to manipulate you into using their Web browser. I hope they pay dearly for this, but I doubt they will.
I shared a video I found that goes through this, and I had a little bit too much fun with ffmpeg so it's available in three formats.
* Original 720p H.264/AAC [93.8 MiB]\n[93.8 MiB]\n[93.8 MiB]\n[93.8 MiB]\n
* 720p H.265/AAC [33.1 MiB]\n[33.1 MiB]\n[33.1 MiB]\n[33.1 MiB]\n
* 480p VP9/Opus [36.4 MiB]\n[36.4 MiB]\n[36.4 MiB]\n[36.4 MiB]\n*
> ...I don’t agree with the narrative of Microsoft trying to make things harder to do to keep you in their ecosystem...
Microsoft is leveraging their position as the vendor of your operating system to manipulate you into using their Web browser. I hope they pay dearly for this, but I doubt they will.
I shared a video I found that goes through this, and I had a little bit too much fun with ffmpeg so it's available in three formats.
* Original 720p H.264/AAC \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
* 720p H.265/AAC \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
* 480p VP9/Opus \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n*
> ...I don’t agree with the narrative of Microsoft trying to make things harder to do to keep you in their ecosystem...
Microsoft is leveraging their position as the vendor of your operating system to manipulate you into using their Web browser. I hope they pay dearly for this, but I doubt they will.
I shared a video I found that goes through this, and I had a little bit too much fun with ffmpeg so it's available in three formats.
* Original 720p H.264/AAC \n\n\n\n
* 720p H.265/AAC \n\n\n\n
* 480p VP9/Opus \n\n\n\n*
> ...I don’t agree with the narrative of Microsoft trying to make things harder to do to keep you in their ecosystem...
Microsoft is leveraging their position as the vendor of your operating system to manipulate you into using their Web browser. I hope they pay dearly for this, but I doubt they will.
I shared a video I found that goes through this, and I had a little bit too much fun with ffmpeg so it's available in three formats.
* Original 720p H.264/AAC [93.8 MiB]
* 720p H.265/AAC [33.1 MiB]
* 480p VP9/Opus [36.4 MiB]*
> ...it has the main features a general user could want...
Shortcut creation, open with, file properties, options for third party software like 7-zip, and more are all hidden behind another click. The old menu was more functional because everything you needed was right there.
> ...easier to navigate...
It's much harder to navigate because the things you use most often are now relegated to tiny icons with no labels so you have to guess which one will do what you want.
What's more, the icons are all the same 2 or 3 colors. Remembering "the box and the line with the cursor on it is rename" is much more difficult to remember than "the one that says 'Rename' is rename" or even "the blue one is rename".
If I remember correctly, you can't even go off of position in the list because only the options that are applicable will show up. For example, if you don't have anything on the clipboard, the paste button isn't grayed out, it's just gone.
I really am impressed with status.cafe. There's no JavaScript, and the UI is very simple and to-the-point. The forum is the same way. It feels like SourceHut, although I've never had an account on there.
Screenshot of my desktop with the James Webb Telescope picture of the Carina Nebula as the background
With S Mode, at least you can get out of it (or at least you could on 10) by signing into a Microsoft account and clicking "yes" on some very scary looking dialog boxes. They hold your freedom hostage, and your personal information is the ransom. Of course, you can always re-install your OS. As far as I know, the embedded license key on S Mode machines activate regular Home editions of Windows. They did on 10. I'm sure they'll put a stop to that soon enough. They're already trying to stop people setting up their computers without a Microsoft account in the first place.
With S Mode, at least you can get out of it (or at least you could on 10) by signing into a Microsoft account and clicking "yes" on some very scary looking dialog boxes. They hold your freedom hostage, and your personal information is the ransom. Of course, you can always re-install your OS. As far as I know, the embedded license key on S Mode machines activate regular Home editions of Windows. They did on 10. I'm sure they'll put a stop to that soon enough. They're already trying to stop people setting up their computers without a Microsoft account in the first place.
For the sake of experimentation, I made another one using vp9 for video and Opus for audio. It's at 480p instead of 720p like the others. It works fine on Firefox and Chromium based browsers on my Linux machine. Does it work on your phone? 480p vp9/Opus version \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
For the sake of experimentation, I made another one using vp9 for video and Opus for audio. It's at 480p instead of 720p like the others. It works fine on Firefox and Chromium based browsers on my Linux machine. Does it work on your phone? 480p vp9/Opus version [36.4 MiB][36.4 MiB][36.4 MiB][36.4 MiB][36.4 MiB][36.4 MiB][36.4 MiB][36.4 MiB]
For the sake of experimentation, I made another one using vp9 for video and Opus for audio. It's at 480p instead of 720p like the others. It works fine on Firefox and Chromium based browsers on my Linux machine. Does it work on your phone? 480p vp9/Opus version [36.4 MiB][36.4 MiB=]=
For the sake of experimentation, I made another one using vp9 for video and Opus for audio. It's at 480p instead of 720p like the others. It works fine on Firefox and Chromium based browsers on my Linux machine. Does it work on your phone? 480p vp9/Opus version \n\n
For the sake of experimentation, I made another one using vp9 for video and Opus for audio. It's at 480p instead of 720p like the others. It works fine on Firefox and Chromium based browsers on my Linux machine. Does it work on your phone? 480p vp9/Opus version [36.4 MiB]\n[36.4 MiB]\n[36.4 MiB]\n[36.4 MiB]\n
For the sake of experimentation, I made another one using vp9 for video and Opus for audio. It's at 480p instead of 720p like the others. It works fine on Firefox and Chromium based browsers on my Linux machine. Does it work on your phone? 480p vp9/Opus version [36.4 MiB]
For the sake of experimentation, I made another one using vp9 for video and Opus for audio. It's at 480p instead of 720p like the others. It works fine on Firefox and Chromium based browsers on my Linux machine. Does it work on your phone? 480p vp9/Opus version [36.4 MiB][36.4 MiB=][36.4 MiB][36.4 MiB=][36.4 MiB][36.4 MiB=][36.4 MiB][36.4 MiB=]
For the sake of experimentation, I made another one using vp9 for video and Opus for audio. It's at 480p instead of 720p like the others. It works fine on Firefox and Chromium based browsers on my Linux machine. Does it work on your phone? 480p vp9/Opus version \n\n\n\n
Anyway, 2004 called. They want their video compression standard back.
[Windows 11 in a Nutshell (H.265)](https://files.catbox.moe/brhtyx.mp4) [33.1 MiB][33.1 MiB][33.1 MiB][33.1 MiB][33.1 MiB][33.1 MiB][33.1 MiB][33.1 MiB]
[Windows 11 in a Nutshell (H.265)](https://files.catbox.moe/brhtyx.mp4) [33.1 MiB][33.1 MiB=]=
[Windows 11 in a Nutshell (H.265)](https://files.catbox.moe/brhtyx.mp4) \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
[Windows 11 in a Nutshell (H.265)](https://files.catbox.moe/brhtyx.mp4) \n\n
[Windows 11 in a Nutshell (H.265)](https://files.catbox.moe/brhtyx.mp4) [33.1 MiB][33.1 MiB=][33.1 MiB][33.1 MiB=][33.1 MiB][33.1 MiB=][33.1 MiB][33.1 MiB=]