I don’t remember having seen bender’s key, though. Maybe that one works. I might give it a try some day, when my motivation is back up. 😂
I don’t remember having seen bender’s key, though. Maybe that one works. I might give it a try some day, when my motivation is back up. 😂
I don’t remember having seen bender’s key, though. Maybe that one works. I might give it a try some day, when my motivation is back up. 😂
I don’t remember having seen bender’s key, though. Maybe that one works. I might give it a try some day, when my motivation is back up. 😂
Windows XP has scarred me for life. 😂 I bought this thing, cost me 140 bucks, but I can’t use it anymore because Microsoft says so. Screw that.
I won’t buy commercial software anymore and haven’t done so in a long time. You want an online activation or, better yet, some sort of subscription? Screw that.
Up until the end of the 1990ies and very early 2000s, it was okay to buy commercial software. Things like StarOffice 3.1 still work just fine today, because you can just install it, done.
Free/libre software is the way to go.
Windows XP has scarred me for life. 😂 I bought this thing, cost me 140 bucks, but I can’t use it anymore because Microsoft says so. Screw that.
I won’t buy commercial software anymore and haven’t done so in a long time. You want an online activation or, better yet, some sort of subscription? Screw that.
Up until the end of the 1990ies and very early 2000s, it was okay to buy commercial software. Things like StarOffice 3.1 still work just fine today, because you can just install it, done.
Free/libre software is the way to go.
Windows XP has scarred me for life. 😂 I bought this thing, cost me 140 bucks, but I can’t use it anymore because Microsoft says so. Screw that.
I won’t buy commercial software anymore and haven’t done so in a long time. You want an online activation or, better yet, some sort of subscription? Screw that.
Up until the end of the 1990ies and very early 2000s, it was okay to buy commercial software. Things like StarOffice 3.1 still work just fine today, because you can just install it, done.
Free/libre software is the way to go.
Windows XP has scarred me for life. 😂 I bought this thing, cost me 140 bucks, but I can’t use it anymore because Microsoft says so. Screw that.
I won’t buy commercial software anymore and haven’t done so in a long time. You want an online activation or, better yet, some sort of subscription? Screw that.
Up until the end of the 1990ies and very early 2000s, it was okay to buy commercial software. Things like StarOffice 3.1 still work just fine today, because you can just install it, done.
Free/libre software is the way to go.
https://movq.de/v/2456cfb05a/helvetica.png
This broke a year ago and I gave up on it. Now it’s back. Crisp fonts, just like in the terminal. 💚
This is *much* easier for me to read. Maybe it’s because of my myopia. Everything is a little bit fuzzy anyway and font antialiasing *on top* is really exhausting for me.
https://movq.de/v/2456cfb05a/helvetica.png
This broke a year ago and I gave up on it. Now it’s back. Crisp fonts, just like in the terminal. 💚
This is *much* easier for me to read. Maybe it’s because of my myopia. Everything is a little bit fuzzy anyway and font antialiasing *on top* is really exhausting for me.
https://movq.de/v/2456cfb05a/helvetica.png
This broke a year ago and I gave up on it. Now it’s back. Crisp fonts, just like in the terminal. 💚
This is *much* easier for me to read. Maybe it’s because of my myopia. Everything is a little bit fuzzy anyway and font antialiasing *on top* is really exhausting for me.
https://movq.de/v/2456cfb05a/helvetica.png
This broke a year ago and I gave up on it. Now it’s back. Crisp fonts, just like in the terminal. 💚
This is *much* easier for me to read. Maybe it’s because of my myopia. Everything is a little bit fuzzy anyway and font antialiasing *on top* is really exhausting for me.
https://movq.de/v/dd46b2faa2/s.png
https://movq.de/v/dd46b2faa2/s.png
https://movq.de/v/dd46b2faa2/s.png
https://movq.de/v/dd46b2faa2/s.png
https://movq.de/v/af1f167ce4/s.png
RIP, ICQ.
https://movq.de/v/af1f167ce4/s.png
RIP, ICQ.
https://movq.de/v/af1f167ce4/s.png
RIP, ICQ.
https://movq.de/v/af1f167ce4/s.png
RIP, ICQ.
Ahhh, TeXNicCenter! Many people in Uni used this. What happened to it, is it dead? The last release is from 10 years ago. 🫤
> Admittedly, it took me a while to figure out and appreciate all the advantages of actually marking up the document structure properly.
Same here, to be honest. I *think* it was HTML which changed that eventually. 🤔 Not sure if any “ordinary” users that I know use semantic markup, but then again, none of them write any documents that *need* this. And in reality, most people are more concerned (rightfully so) with the actual appearance of their document – so it is an *extra step* to first mark something as a heading and then change the document style to get the appearance they actually want. That’s why I think that all the “Works”-like suites aren’t complete rubbish. They have their place.
> These days I rarely reach for LaTeX or LibreOffice to craft new stuff in my private life. Simple text files is usually it.
I was going to ask “but how do you write letters”, and then I realized that the last letter I’ve written was in 2022. 😂 It has become super rare indeed.
Ahhh, TeXNicCenter! Many people in Uni used this. What happened to it, is it dead? The last release is from 10 years ago. 🫤
> Admittedly, it took me a while to figure out and appreciate all the advantages of actually marking up the document structure properly.
Same here, to be honest. I *think* it was HTML which changed that eventually. 🤔 Not sure if any “ordinary” users that I know use semantic markup, but then again, none of them write any documents that *need* this. And in reality, most people are more concerned (rightfully so) with the actual appearance of their document – so it is an *extra step* to first mark something as a heading and then change the document style to get the appearance they actually want. That’s why I think that all the “Works”-like suites aren’t complete rubbish. They have their place.
> These days I rarely reach for LaTeX or LibreOffice to craft new stuff in my private life. Simple text files is usually it.
I was going to ask “but how do you write letters”, and then I realized that the last letter I’ve written was in 2022. 😂 It has become super rare indeed.
Ahhh, TeXNicCenter! Many people in Uni used this. What happened to it, is it dead? The last release is from 10 years ago. 🫤
> Admittedly, it took me a while to figure out and appreciate all the advantages of actually marking up the document structure properly.
Same here, to be honest. I *think* it was HTML which changed that eventually. 🤔 Not sure if any “ordinary” users that I know use semantic markup, but then again, none of them write any documents that *need* this. And in reality, most people are more concerned (rightfully so) with the actual appearance of their document – so it is an *extra step* to first mark something as a heading and then change the document style to get the appearance they actually want. That’s why I think that all the “Works”-like suites aren’t complete rubbish. They have their place.
> These days I rarely reach for LaTeX or LibreOffice to craft new stuff in my private life. Simple text files is usually it.
I was going to ask “but how do you write letters”, and then I realized that the last letter I’ve written was in 2022. 😂 It has become super rare indeed.
Ahhh, TeXNicCenter! Many people in Uni used this. What happened to it, is it dead? The last release is from 10 years ago. 🫤
> Admittedly, it took me a while to figure out and appreciate all the advantages of actually marking up the document structure properly.
Same here, to be honest. I *think* it was HTML which changed that eventually. 🤔 Not sure if any “ordinary” users that I know use semantic markup, but then again, none of them write any documents that *need* this. And in reality, most people are more concerned (rightfully so) with the actual appearance of their document – so it is an *extra step* to first mark something as a heading and then change the document style to get the appearance they actually want. That’s why I think that all the “Works”-like suites aren’t complete rubbish. They have their place.
> These days I rarely reach for LaTeX or LibreOffice to craft new stuff in my private life. Simple text files is usually it.
I was going to ask “but how do you write letters”, and then I realized that the last letter I’ve written was in 2022. 😂 It has become super rare indeed.
That outage yesterday was a good thing. Made me question and reevaluate all this. 😅
That outage yesterday was a good thing. Made me question and reevaluate all this. 😅
That outage yesterday was a good thing. Made me question and reevaluate all this. 😅
That outage yesterday was a good thing. Made me question and reevaluate all this. 😅
DuckDuckGo’s help page doesn’t really make it clear that they rely on Bing *that much*:
https://duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help-pages/results/sources/
I guess this outage is a good thing. 😅 Lots of people now read up on this.
DuckDuckGo’s help page doesn’t really make it clear that they rely on Bing *that much*:
https://duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help-pages/results/sources/
I guess this outage is a good thing. 😅 Lots of people now read up on this.
DuckDuckGo’s help page doesn’t really make it clear that they rely on Bing *that much*:
https://duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help-pages/results/sources/
I guess this outage is a good thing. 😅 Lots of people now read up on this.
DuckDuckGo’s help page doesn’t really make it clear that they rely on Bing *that much*:
https://duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help-pages/results/sources/
I guess this outage is a good thing. 😅 Lots of people now read up on this.
https://www.searchenginemap.com/
Why do I keep getting hits by a DuckDuckBot then?
www.uninformativ.de 20.191.45.212 - - [23/May/2024:03:00:48 +0200] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 200 659 "http://www.uninformativ.de/" "DuckDuckBot/1.1; (+http://duckduckgo.com/duckduckbot.html)"
https://www.searchenginemap.com/
Why do I keep getting hits by a DuckDuckBot then?
www.uninformativ.de 20.191.45.212 - - [23/May/2024:03:00:48 +0200] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 200 659 "http://www.uninformativ.de/" "DuckDuckBot/1.1; (+http://duckduckgo.com/duckduckbot.html)"
https://www.searchenginemap.com/
Why do I keep getting hits by a DuckDuckBot then?
www.uninformativ.de 20.191.45.212 - - [23/May/2024:03:00:48 +0200] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 200 659 "http://www.uninformativ.de/" "DuckDuckBot/1.1; (+http://duckduckgo.com/duckduckbot.html)"
https://www.searchenginemap.com/
Why do I keep getting hits by a DuckDuckBot then?
www.uninformativ.de 20.191.45.212 - - [23/May/2024:03:00:48 +0200] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 200 659 "http://www.uninformativ.de/" "DuckDuckBot/1.1; (+http://duckduckgo.com/duckduckbot.html)"
> O_o Software problem, it can't be helped.
https://movq.de/v/961aef2366/nsfw068-willkommen-im-kapitalismus.ogg (This was originally about an iPhone, IIRC, but it fits many situations. 🥴)
> O_o Software problem, it can't be helped.
https://movq.de/v/961aef2366/nsfw068-willkommen-im-kapitalismus.ogg (This was originally about an iPhone, IIRC, but it fits many situations. 🥴)
> O_o Software problem, it can't be helped.
https://movq.de/v/961aef2366/nsfw068-willkommen-im-kapitalismus.ogg (This was originally about an iPhone, IIRC, but it fits many situations. 🥴)
> O_o Software problem, it can't be helped.
https://movq.de/v/961aef2366/nsfw068-willkommen-im-kapitalismus.ogg (This was originally about an iPhone, IIRC, but it fits many situations. 🥴)