# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
#
# Usage:
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users View list of users and latest twt date.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt View all twts.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri View all mentions for uri.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash View all twts for a conversation subject.
#
# Options:
# uri Filter to show a specific users twts.
# offset Start index for quey.
# limit Count of items to return (going back in time).
#
# twt range = 1 903
# self = https://watcher.sour.is?uri=https://tilde.pt/~marado/twtxt.txt&offset=203
# next = https://watcher.sour.is?uri=https://tilde.pt/~marado/twtxt.txt&offset=303
# prev = https://watcher.sour.is?uri=https://tilde.pt/~marado/twtxt.txt&offset=103
@tobie @JimDabell I am not sure that you can really dismiss a FAQ entry as being \\"only partially correct\\", when the FAQ comes from OSI. And there are other interesting bits on that FAQ, like the fact that «\\"Free software\\" and \\"open source software\\" are two terms for the same thing» (inc. freedom0) https://twitter.com/mind_booster/status/1225409766702358529
@tobie Interesting. So, there is a debate on wether or not an \\"You cannot use this software in violation of human rights\\" would be compliant or in violation of OSD's criteria 6? It seems straight-forward to me, but IANAL. Do you have a link on that particular argument? https://twitter.com/mind_booster/status/1225359823832780800
@tobie The question isn't posed correctly. You cannot make a license that \\"forbids using open source in way X\\", you can only write a license that \\"forbids the use of the software you license it with for X\\", which has nothing to do with Open Source as that license is not Open Source. https://twitter.com/mind_booster/status/1225355568606523392
@expresso Obrigados o tanas. Nenhum partido manda no voto de nenhum deputado eleito, e o trabalho do deputado é votar e representar o seu eleitorado. Disciplina de voto é seguida por quem quer.O preço de não cumprir também não é elevado:no máx. é expulso de um partido que pede o q não deve https://twitter.com/mind_booster/status/1224840063030374401
@paulasimoes It doesn't stop from being interesting that OSI today is saying they were the first and are the master branch, from which \\"open core\\" forked, ignoring that OSI can also be seen as a FS fork.\\n\\nWhat happened to last year's OSI approach to FS that \\"hey, we're all the same\\"? https://twitter.com/mind_booster/status/1223889308563726336
Focus is on what can be done, but it is interesting what we have now:\\n\\"The problem is the bias, the bias is illegal.\\" (EU fundamental rights)\\n\\"Unfortunately, biases will always exist.\\"\\n\\"We have already anti-discrimination laws, can't they be already applied to discriminatory AI?\\" https://twitter.com/mind_booster/status/1222949753668980736