# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
#
# Usage:
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users View list of users and latest twt date.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt View all twts.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri View all mentions for uri.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash View all twts for a conversation subject.
#
# Options:
# uri Filter to show a specific users twts.
# offset Start index for quey.
# limit Count of items to return (going back in time).
#
# twt range = 1 34
# self = https://watcher.sour.is?uri=https://twtxt.net/user/rob/twtxt.txt&offset=34
@sonofyah @twtxt Greetings 'son of yah' are you Bill?
I will leave comments here for now Bill, This is a brand new blog program written by my Son, James, so please cope with its functional limitations. The program is not gov regulated, only private/public with ads or censure.
Comments are limited too, bother.
The Great Uncaused Cause "He who exists" (meaning of YHWH), also appears as ANOSH.
None of the heavenly visitors are of "adam" or "basar", they come to Abram as "ANOSH". Hence functional descriptor.
Bill said before: "In Gen18:2; The account does not say Abraham saw Yahweh and two men. It says three men appeared to him. Hence, we should not suppose that two of the visitors/messengers belonged to one category of being but the third visitor/messenger belonged to another category. All three visitors/messengers are categorized in the same manner: men.
Rob replies: OK Abram saw YHWH, but than it says there were three ANOSH.
Consider this, CHERUB are not ANOSH either, nor is YHWH also ANOSH.
The two angels are cherub but are also ANOSH
In your replies Bill, you didn't really discuss "anosh" as a category of being or a description of function?
Let's review what I actually said:
Bill replies: "V 24; God IS ruwach; He does NOT function AS ruwach in the second or third person, of Trinity doctrine
Rob says" Bill you are changing topic again" this is NOT about "anosh". This is about who is elohiym?
You added emphasis to "elohiym IS ruwach" a English KJV translation, the "IS" is not there.
Again this is off topic:
ruwach elohiym, in say Genesis 1:2 and scholars call this a noun noun use of Hebrew as a "construct state" so they translate the two nouns as "ruwach of elohiym" . I do not really agree with this idea, because it's not consistent,
Bill you also mention "John 3:1-3; " the story in the NT regarding the second birth, where "adam make of basar" during the first birth, are created with new "ruwach" during a second birth. This is a different topic. The Hebrew word "anosh" is not used here, only "basar" and "ruwach" are.
So that means you are using the word "anosh" as a word you think to use for "basar"--- different word meanings... I agree "basar" means "flesh", but "anosh" meaning "man" according to Jeff Benner, is more of a functional action for man "The Hebrew word for man is "adam".
Bill: Anosh is humanity created in the image (ruwach) of Yahweh: John 3:6; That which hath been born of the flesh IS flesh (humanity,anosh); And that which hath been born of the ruwack IS ruwack
Rob replies: Let look at the verse you quote:
Joh 3:6 That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.
In Greek these words are : "sarx" and "pnueumia"
In Hebrew these words are: "basar" and "ruwach"
(I get these quickly from Jeff Benner's Greek to Hebrew lexicon, or you cross reference the NT word to a quote from the OT verse)
I love PHP, it the most programming I did, to get my webpages going, which are also plain text files. The HTML stuff is done on a PHP engine.
@Son, OK deleted cache and logged in camera nothing Formatting nothing
Testing the bold and strikethrough, what does code do? Not working?
A brand new day. Maybe work on my chook pen today :)
Avatar worked OK, I pressed Ctr-minus and the white space went away. All cool in IE version 11 still.
Sidelinking sounds OK, but what happens if the cars travelling remotely, fail to talk to each other? A crash of dead people, due to technology failure.
Today I finally got our water tank and bore fixed and running OK. Hopefully the float switch will shut off the full tank as well. The pump is currently running at only 14litres per minute, about the maximum rate of our bore stream.
Wow posting files works.... Nice going Tweet. Any chance of making the root directory www.Tweet.net? Love the comment by @TechTinkering ...yes a de-centralized minimalist microblogging service that uses self hosted text files..... yes...this service will go far....as soon as the bugs are fixed....
When I click on settings, a white field covers the info underneath. Cheers
Wow, my Son I a genius with fixing bugs.
Arhh well twtxt is still being developed. It's getting better :)
Another morning. Clean out tank. Setting up bigger fresh water tank. Had fun moving it with tractor :)
Great day, the pump works fine. Pumping 14 litres /minute. The bore held up well. Did not run dry. My older pump used 70litres/minute and ran the bore dry within 3 minutes. This new pump, works all day without any loss. However the water output is less :)
Morning everybody. Have to remove old bore pump and install a smaller pump, 10litres/minute.
twtxt needs to create feed, than give new feeds a name, for followers to follow feed topics.
Now sure where this discover of feeds will lead :)
Today, I will have to visit the store and get copy of receipt, since I misplaced the original one. Drat.
Fixed bore pump ... downsized the size of the pump.