if err != nil {
...
}
basically accounts for <1-3% of your codebase in the first place.
The entire thing (_fuss_) is really just pathetic IMO.
if err != nil {
...
}
basically accounts for <1-3% of your codebase in the first place.
The entire thing (_fuss_) is really just pathetic IMO.
? garbage. I don't want to be rude, but honestly wtf is wrong with people and making languages harder to read?! ๐คฆโโ๏ธ
? garbage. I don't want to be rude, but honestly wtf is wrong with people and making languages harder to read?! ๐คฆโโ๏ธ
Here it is: https://docs.mills.io/ix4qDHMnQUSPxZ5tXz12Vg?view
It's very rough and needs much more work, but essentially I want to propose the following change to the language's grammar:
f := os.Open("foo.txt") or (e error) {
log.Fatal("error opening file; %s", e)
}
Here it is: https://docs.mills.io/ix4qDHMnQUSPxZ5tXz12Vg?view
It's very rough and needs much more work, but essentially I want to propose the following change to the language's grammar:
f := os.Open("foo.txt") or (e error) {
log.Fatal("error opening file; %s", e)
}
>
> Sabotage varies from highly technical coup de main acts that require detailed planning and the use of specially-trained operatives, to innumerable simple acts which the ordinary individual citizen-saboteur can perform. This paper is primarily concerned with the latter type. Simple sabotage does not require specially prepared tools or equipment; it is executed by an ordinary citizen who may or may not act individually and without the necessity for active connection with an organized group; and it is carried out in such a way as to involve a minimum danger of injury, detection, and reprisal.
>
> Sabotage varies from highly technical coup de main acts that require detailed planning and the use of specially-trained operatives, to innumerable simple acts which the ordinary individual citizen-saboteur can perform. This paper is primarily concerned with the latter type. Simple sabotage does not require specially prepared tools or equipment; it is executed by an ordinary citizen who may or may not act individually and without the necessity for active connection with an organized group; and it is carried out in such a way as to involve a minimum danger of injury, detection, and reprisal.
> Iโm not a fan of IMAP (I donโt want my server to create/keep data)
> Iโm not a fan of IMAP (I donโt want my server to create/keep data)
Yo read as @kat difhtidu points out ๐
Yo read as @kat difhtidu points out ๐
File system: EXTFS
Device size: 29.8 GB = 7287552 Blocks
Space in use: 7.3 GB = 1789413 Blocks
Free Space: 22.5 GB = 5498139 Blocks
Block size: 4096 Byte
Elapsed: 13:01:07, Remaining: 00:00:00, Completed: 100.00%, Rate: 9.38MB/min,
Current block: 6823440, Total block: 7287552, Complete: 100.00%
Total Time: 13:01:07, Ave. Rate: 9.38MB/min, 100.00% completed!
Syncing... OK!
Partclone successfully cloned the device (/dev/sda1) to the image (/dev/sdb1)
Cloned successfully.
[root@sysrescue ~]#
File system: EXTFS
Device size: 29.8 GB = 7287552 Blocks
Space in use: 7.3 GB = 1789413 Blocks
Free Space: 22.5 GB = 5498139 Blocks
Block size: 4096 Byte
Elapsed: 13:01:07, Remaining: 00:00:00, Completed: 100.00%, Rate: 9.38MB/min,
Current block: 6823440, Total block: 7287552, Complete: 100.00%
Total Time: 13:01:07, Ave. Rate: 9.38MB/min, 100.00% completed!
Syncing... OK!
Partclone successfully cloned the device (/dev/sda1) to the image (/dev/sdb1)
Cloned successfully.
[root@sysrescue ~]#
[root@sysrescue ~]# partclone.ext4 -c -s /dev/sda1 -o /dev/sdb1
...
Elapsed: 00:05:32, Remaining: 23:46:57, Completed: 0.39%, 5.12MB/min,
Current block: 6912, Total block: 7287552, Complete: 0.09%
Bloody hell ๐
[root@sysrescue ~]# partclone.ext4 -c -s /dev/sda1 -o /dev/sdb1
...
Elapsed: 00:05:32, Remaining: 23:46:57, Completed: 0.39%, 5.12MB/min,
Current block: 6912, Total block: 7287552, Complete: 0.09%
Bloody hell ๐
Authentication-Results: mail.mills.io;
spf=temperror (mail.mills.io: error in processing during lookup of msprvs1=20121HZ44a1Eg=bounces-367050@irp.stuartkenzie.com: responses is not iterable) smtp.mailfrom="msprvs1=20121HZ44a1Eg=bounces-367050@irp.stuartkenzie.com" smtp.helo=us.proxy.mills.io;
dkim=neutral (invalid public key) header.i=@irp.stuartkenzie.com header.s=scph1124 header.a=rsa-sha256 header.b=BOHvtOsv;
dmarc=none header.from=stuartkenzie.com
Received-SPF: temperror (mail.mills.io: error in processing during lookup of msprvs1=20121HZ44a1Eg=bounces-367050@irp.stuartkenzie.com: responses is not
iterable) client-ip=172.30.0.5;
Received: from us.proxy.mills.io ([172.30.0.5])
by mail.mills.io (Haraka) with ESMTP id 3CD19639-8117-48DB-8137-5B29E3732B5E.1
envelope-from <msprvs1=20121HZ44a1Eg=bounces-367050@irp.stuartkenzie.com>;
Sun, 26 Jan 2025 22:23:33 +0000
Received: from mta-174-87-76.smtp-out.sparkpostmail.com
(mta-174-87-76.smtp-out.sparkpostmail.com [192.174.87.76]) by
us.proxy.mills.io (envelope-sender
<msprvs1=20121HZ44a1Eg=bounces-367050@irp.stuartkenzie.com>) with ESMTPS id
74a301f9; Sun, 26 Jan 2025 22:23:33 +0000
Authentication-Results: mail.mills.io;
spf=temperror (mail.mills.io: error in processing during lookup of msprvs1=20121HZ44a1Eg=bounces-367050@irp.stuartkenzie.com: responses is not iterable) smtp.mailfrom="msprvs1=20121HZ44a1Eg=bounces-367050@irp.stuartkenzie.com" smtp.helo=us.proxy.mills.io;
dkim=neutral (invalid public key) header.i=@irp.stuartkenzie.com header.s=scph1124 header.a=rsa-sha256 header.b=BOHvtOsv;
dmarc=none header.from=stuartkenzie.com
Received-SPF: temperror (mail.mills.io: error in processing during lookup of msprvs1=20121HZ44a1Eg=bounces-367050@irp.stuartkenzie.com: responses is not
iterable) client-ip=172.30.0.5;
Received: from us.proxy.mills.io ([172.30.0.5])
by mail.mills.io (Haraka) with ESMTP id 3CD19639-8117-48DB-8137-5B29E3732B5E.1
envelope-from <msprvs1=20121HZ44a1Eg=bounces-367050@irp.stuartkenzie.com>;
Sun, 26 Jan 2025 22:23:33 +0000
Received: from mta-174-87-76.smtp-out.sparkpostmail.com
(mta-174-87-76.smtp-out.sparkpostmail.com [192.174.87.76]) by
us.proxy.mills.io (envelope-sender
<msprvs1=20121HZ44a1Eg=bounces-367050@irp.stuartkenzie.com>) with ESMTPS id
74a301f9; Sun, 26 Jan 2025 22:23:33 +0000
Authentication-Results: mail.mills.io;
\tspf=temperror (mail.mills.io: error in processing during lookup of msprvs1=20121HZ44a1Eg=bounces-367050@irp.stuartkenzie.com: responses is not iterable) smtp.mailfrom="msprvs1=20121HZ44a1Eg=bounces-367050@irp.stuartkenzie.com" smtp.helo=us.proxy.mills.io;
\tdkim=neutral (invalid public key) header.i=@irp.stuartkenzie.com header.s=scph1124 header.a=rsa-sha256 header.b=BOHvtOsv;
\tdmarc=none header.from=stuartkenzie.com
Received-SPF: temperror (mail.mills.io: error in processing during lookup of msprvs1=20121HZ44a1Eg=bounces-367050@irp.stuartkenzie.com: responses is not
iterable) client-ip=172.30.0.5;
Received: from us.proxy.mills.io ([172.30.0.5])
\tby mail.mills.io (Haraka) with ESMTP id 3CD19639-8117-48DB-8137-5B29E3732B5E.1
\tenvelope-from <msprvs1=20121HZ44a1Eg=bounces-367050@irp.stuartkenzie.com>;
\tSun, 26 Jan 2025 22:23:33 +0000
Received: from mta-174-87-76.smtp-out.sparkpostmail.com
(mta-174-87-76.smtp-out.sparkpostmail.com [192.174.87.76]) by
us.proxy.mills.io (envelope-sender
<msprvs1=20121HZ44a1Eg=bounces-367050@irp.stuartkenzie.com>) with ESMTPS id
74a301f9; Sun, 26 Jan 2025 22:23:33 +0000
Fron: have a bad TLS certificate, the domain in the Reply-To is a blank page. Wut dua fuw?! ๐คฃ And seriously, how du fuq did this even get through my Mail proxies? ๐ค @xuu ๐
Fron: have a bad TLS certificate, the domain in the Reply-To is a blank page. Wut dua fuw?! ๐คฃ And seriously, how du fuq did this even get through my Mail proxies? ๐ค @xuu ๐
yarnd to give it that nice SPA-like UX feel without all this Javascript React nonsense ๐
yarnd to give it that nice SPA-like UX feel without all this Javascript React nonsense ๐
=> https://meet.mills.io/call/Yarn.social=
=> https://meet.mills.io/call/Yarn.social=
