deepseek-r1:7b model using Ollama and this is the result:
$ ollama run deepseek-r1:7b
>>> How many r's in the word strawberry?
<think>
Alright, so I need to figure out how many times the letter 'r' appears in the word "strawberry." Hmm, okay. Let me start by writing down the word to
visualize each letter clearly.
...
Twoo lines later... Argueing with itself over and over again...
> The word "strawberry" contains three 'r's when spelled out as S-T-R-A-W-B-E-R-R-Y. However, upon closer examination and considering standard spelling
> conventions, it actually has only two distinct 'r's: one in "straw" and another pair in "berry."
>
> Answer: There are 2 'r's in the word "strawberry."
Farrkkkk me ๐คฆโโ๏ธ
deepseek-r1:7b model using Ollama and this is the result:
$ ollama run deepseek-r1:7b
>>> How many r's in the word strawberry?
<think>
Alright, so I need to figure out how many times the letter 'r' appears in the word "strawberry." Hmm, okay. Let me start by writing down the word to
visualize each letter clearly.
...
Twoo lines later... Argueing with itself over and over again...
> The word "strawberry" contains three 'r's when spelled out as S-T-R-A-W-B-E-R-R-Y. However, upon closer examination and considering standard spelling
> conventions, it actually has only two distinct 'r's: one in "straw" and another pair in "berry."
>
> Answer: There are 2 'r's in the word "strawberry."
Farrkkkk me ๐คฆโโ๏ธ
> Because Oct 31 = Dec 25.=
> Because Oct 31 = Dec 25.=
if foo ... else bah, but probably doesn't fit the styoe of the Go grammer.What I absolutely hate is this proposal. Making
? to magicalโข things, making the code harder to read and reason about is bonkers.
if foo ... else bah, but probably doesn't fit the styoe of the Go grammer.What I absolutely hate is this proposal. Making
? to magicalโข things, making the code harder to read and reason about is bonkers.
if err != nil {
...
}
basically accounts for <1-3% of your codebase in the first place.
The entire thing (_fuss_) is really just pathetic IMO.
if err != nil {
...
}
basically accounts for <1-3% of your codebase in the first place.
The entire thing (_fuss_) is really just pathetic IMO.
? garbage. I don't want to be rude, but honestly wtf is wrong with people and making languages harder to read?! ๐คฆโโ๏ธ
? garbage. I don't want to be rude, but honestly wtf is wrong with people and making languages harder to read?! ๐คฆโโ๏ธ
Here it is: https://docs.mills.io/ix4qDHMnQUSPxZ5tXz12Vg?view
It's very rough and needs much more work, but essentially I want to propose the following change to the language's grammar:
f := os.Open("foo.txt") or (e error) {
log.Fatal("error opening file; %s", e)
}
Here it is: https://docs.mills.io/ix4qDHMnQUSPxZ5tXz12Vg?view
It's very rough and needs much more work, but essentially I want to propose the following change to the language's grammar:
f := os.Open("foo.txt") or (e error) {
log.Fatal("error opening file; %s", e)
}
>
> Sabotage varies from highly technical coup de main acts that require detailed planning and the use of specially-trained operatives, to innumerable simple acts which the ordinary individual citizen-saboteur can perform. This paper is primarily concerned with the latter type. Simple sabotage does not require specially prepared tools or equipment; it is executed by an ordinary citizen who may or may not act individually and without the necessity for active connection with an organized group; and it is carried out in such a way as to involve a minimum danger of injury, detection, and reprisal.
>
> Sabotage varies from highly technical coup de main acts that require detailed planning and the use of specially-trained operatives, to innumerable simple acts which the ordinary individual citizen-saboteur can perform. This paper is primarily concerned with the latter type. Simple sabotage does not require specially prepared tools or equipment; it is executed by an ordinary citizen who may or may not act individually and without the necessity for active connection with an organized group; and it is carried out in such a way as to involve a minimum danger of injury, detection, and reprisal.
> Iโm not a fan of IMAP (I donโt want my server to create/keep data)
> Iโm not a fan of IMAP (I donโt want my server to create/keep data)
Yo read as @kat difhtidu points out ๐
Yo read as @kat difhtidu points out ๐
File system: EXTFS
Device size: 29.8 GB = 7287552 Blocks
Space in use: 7.3 GB = 1789413 Blocks
Free Space: 22.5 GB = 5498139 Blocks
Block size: 4096 Byte
Elapsed: 13:01:07, Remaining: 00:00:00, Completed: 100.00%, Rate: 9.38MB/min,
Current block: 6823440, Total block: 7287552, Complete: 100.00%
Total Time: 13:01:07, Ave. Rate: 9.38MB/min, 100.00% completed!
Syncing... OK!
Partclone successfully cloned the device (/dev/sda1) to the image (/dev/sdb1)
Cloned successfully.
[root@sysrescue ~]#
File system: EXTFS
Device size: 29.8 GB = 7287552 Blocks
Space in use: 7.3 GB = 1789413 Blocks
Free Space: 22.5 GB = 5498139 Blocks
Block size: 4096 Byte
Elapsed: 13:01:07, Remaining: 00:00:00, Completed: 100.00%, Rate: 9.38MB/min,
Current block: 6823440, Total block: 7287552, Complete: 100.00%
Total Time: 13:01:07, Ave. Rate: 9.38MB/min, 100.00% completed!
Syncing... OK!
Partclone successfully cloned the device (/dev/sda1) to the image (/dev/sdb1)
Cloned successfully.
[root@sysrescue ~]#
[root@sysrescue ~]# partclone.ext4 -c -s /dev/sda1 -o /dev/sdb1
...
Elapsed: 00:05:32, Remaining: 23:46:57, Completed: 0.39%, 5.12MB/min,
Current block: 6912, Total block: 7287552, Complete: 0.09%
Bloody hell ๐
[root@sysrescue ~]# partclone.ext4 -c -s /dev/sda1 -o /dev/sdb1
...
Elapsed: 00:05:32, Remaining: 23:46:57, Completed: 0.39%, 5.12MB/min,
Current block: 6912, Total block: 7287552, Complete: 0.09%
Bloody hell ๐
Authentication-Results: mail.mills.io;
spf=temperror (mail.mills.io: error in processing during lookup of msprvs1=20121HZ44a1Eg=bounces-367050@irp.stuartkenzie.com: responses is not iterable) smtp.mailfrom="msprvs1=20121HZ44a1Eg=bounces-367050@irp.stuartkenzie.com" smtp.helo=us.proxy.mills.io;
dkim=neutral (invalid public key) header.i=@irp.stuartkenzie.com header.s=scph1124 header.a=rsa-sha256 header.b=BOHvtOsv;
dmarc=none header.from=stuartkenzie.com
Received-SPF: temperror (mail.mills.io: error in processing during lookup of msprvs1=20121HZ44a1Eg=bounces-367050@irp.stuartkenzie.com: responses is not
iterable) client-ip=172.30.0.5;
Received: from us.proxy.mills.io ([172.30.0.5])
by mail.mills.io (Haraka) with ESMTP id 3CD19639-8117-48DB-8137-5B29E3732B5E.1
envelope-from <msprvs1=20121HZ44a1Eg=bounces-367050@irp.stuartkenzie.com>;
Sun, 26 Jan 2025 22:23:33 +0000
Received: from mta-174-87-76.smtp-out.sparkpostmail.com
(mta-174-87-76.smtp-out.sparkpostmail.com [192.174.87.76]) by
us.proxy.mills.io (envelope-sender
<msprvs1=20121HZ44a1Eg=bounces-367050@irp.stuartkenzie.com>) with ESMTPS id
74a301f9; Sun, 26 Jan 2025 22:23:33 +0000
Authentication-Results: mail.mills.io;
spf=temperror (mail.mills.io: error in processing during lookup of msprvs1=20121HZ44a1Eg=bounces-367050@irp.stuartkenzie.com: responses is not iterable) smtp.mailfrom="msprvs1=20121HZ44a1Eg=bounces-367050@irp.stuartkenzie.com" smtp.helo=us.proxy.mills.io;
dkim=neutral (invalid public key) header.i=@irp.stuartkenzie.com header.s=scph1124 header.a=rsa-sha256 header.b=BOHvtOsv;
dmarc=none header.from=stuartkenzie.com
Received-SPF: temperror (mail.mills.io: error in processing during lookup of msprvs1=20121HZ44a1Eg=bounces-367050@irp.stuartkenzie.com: responses is not
iterable) client-ip=172.30.0.5;
Received: from us.proxy.mills.io ([172.30.0.5])
by mail.mills.io (Haraka) with ESMTP id 3CD19639-8117-48DB-8137-5B29E3732B5E.1
envelope-from <msprvs1=20121HZ44a1Eg=bounces-367050@irp.stuartkenzie.com>;
Sun, 26 Jan 2025 22:23:33 +0000
Received: from mta-174-87-76.smtp-out.sparkpostmail.com
(mta-174-87-76.smtp-out.sparkpostmail.com [192.174.87.76]) by
us.proxy.mills.io (envelope-sender
<msprvs1=20121HZ44a1Eg=bounces-367050@irp.stuartkenzie.com>) with ESMTPS id
74a301f9; Sun, 26 Jan 2025 22:23:33 +0000
Authentication-Results: mail.mills.io;
\tspf=temperror (mail.mills.io: error in processing during lookup of msprvs1=20121HZ44a1Eg=bounces-367050@irp.stuartkenzie.com: responses is not iterable) smtp.mailfrom="msprvs1=20121HZ44a1Eg=bounces-367050@irp.stuartkenzie.com" smtp.helo=us.proxy.mills.io;
\tdkim=neutral (invalid public key) header.i=@irp.stuartkenzie.com header.s=scph1124 header.a=rsa-sha256 header.b=BOHvtOsv;
\tdmarc=none header.from=stuartkenzie.com
Received-SPF: temperror (mail.mills.io: error in processing during lookup of msprvs1=20121HZ44a1Eg=bounces-367050@irp.stuartkenzie.com: responses is not
iterable) client-ip=172.30.0.5;
Received: from us.proxy.mills.io ([172.30.0.5])
\tby mail.mills.io (Haraka) with ESMTP id 3CD19639-8117-48DB-8137-5B29E3732B5E.1
\tenvelope-from <msprvs1=20121HZ44a1Eg=bounces-367050@irp.stuartkenzie.com>;
\tSun, 26 Jan 2025 22:23:33 +0000
Received: from mta-174-87-76.smtp-out.sparkpostmail.com
(mta-174-87-76.smtp-out.sparkpostmail.com [192.174.87.76]) by
us.proxy.mills.io (envelope-sender
<msprvs1=20121HZ44a1Eg=bounces-367050@irp.stuartkenzie.com>) with ESMTPS id
74a301f9; Sun, 26 Jan 2025 22:23:33 +0000
Fron: have a bad TLS certificate, the domain in the Reply-To is a blank page. Wut dua fuw?! ๐คฃ And seriously, how du fuq did this even get through my Mail proxies? ๐ค @xuu ๐
Fron: have a bad TLS certificate, the domain in the Reply-To is a blank page. Wut dua fuw?! ๐คฃ And seriously, how du fuq did this even get through my Mail proxies? ๐ค @xuu ๐
