On the other hand, *requiring* it means you’ll notice failures sooner, because even your own internal email fails, so hey, there’s that. 🤣
On the other hand, *requiring* it means you’ll notice failures sooner, because even your own internal email fails, so hey, there’s that. 🤣
On the other hand, *requiring* it means you’ll notice failures sooner, because even your own internal email fails, so hey, there’s that. 🤣
On the other hand, *requiring* it means you’ll notice failures sooner, because even your own internal email fails, so hey, there’s that. 🤣
Buuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuut why wasn’t Google support able to tell you this? SPF/DKIM is a basic part of today’s email. It’s one of the first things they should have checked.
Let’s say there’s room for improvement when it comes to Google support. 🙄
Buuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuut why wasn’t Google support able to tell you this? SPF/DKIM is a basic part of today’s email. It’s one of the first things they should have checked.
Let’s say there’s room for improvement when it comes to Google support. 🙄
Buuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuut why wasn’t Google support able to tell you this? SPF/DKIM is a basic part of today’s email. It’s one of the first things they should have checked.
Let’s say there’s room for improvement when it comes to Google support. 🙄
Pissed to no end. 😡
Pissed to no end. 😡
Pissed to no end. 😡
We also had snow today. I took an extra walk before work, which was lovely. Enjoy snow while we still have it. (I guess it’ll either go away or turn into super crazy harsh winters.)
We also had snow today. I took an extra walk before work, which was lovely. Enjoy snow while we still have it. (I guess it’ll either go away or turn into super crazy harsh winters.)
We also had snow today. I took an extra walk before work, which was lovely. Enjoy snow while we still have it. (I guess it’ll either go away or turn into super crazy harsh winters.)
Animals are amazing. It’s so cold, yet they still do fine. Imagine a human walking around naked. Why did our ancestors move so far up north?! Couldn’t we have just stayed in Africa? 😅
Animals are amazing. It’s so cold, yet they still do fine. Imagine a human walking around naked. Why did our ancestors move so far up north?! Couldn’t we have just stayed in Africa? 😅
Animals are amazing. It’s so cold, yet they still do fine. Imagine a human walking around naked. Why did our ancestors move so far up north?! Couldn’t we have just stayed in Africa? 😅
But hey, this year the rule is: “No presents!” Let’s see how well that works. 😏
But hey, this year the rule is: “No presents!” Let’s see how well that works. 😏
But hey, this year the rule is: “No presents!” Let’s see how well that works. 😏
a <= b to !b.Before(a)) is awful. To be fair, if there was an a.BeforeOrEqual(b), it’d be a bit better, right? Anyway, that’s still less readable than a <= b, I think.So, hum, it does have its use cases. :)
(It’s always the same. If your goal is to write clean, readable code, then such features can be a blessing. Only problem is, “clean” and “readable” are very much subjective … Nah, I won’t start a discussion about that now. 😅)
a <= b to !b.Before(a)) is awful. To be fair, if there was an a.BeforeOrEqual(b), it’d be a bit better, right? Anyway, that’s still less readable than a <= b, I think.So, hum, it does have its use cases. :)
(It’s always the same. If your goal is to write clean, readable code, then such features can be a blessing. Only problem is, “clean” and “readable” are very much subjective … Nah, I won’t start a discussion about that now. 😅)
a <= b to !b.Before(a)) is awful. To be fair, if there was an a.BeforeOrEqual(b), it’d be a bit better, right? Anyway, that’s still less readable than a <= b, I think.So, hum, it does have its use cases. :)
(It’s always the same. If your goal is to write clean, readable code, then such features can be a blessing. Only problem is, “clean” and “readable” are very much subjective … Nah, I won’t start a discussion about that now. 😅)
+ and * in C++ to allow for visually appealing multiplication of matrices and vectors and that kind of thing. Allows you to write M * v. That’s handy and very readable.Other than that, no idea … Overloading operators can cause lots and lots of confusion. 🫤
+ and * in C++ to allow for visually appealing multiplication of matrices and vectors and that kind of thing. Allows you to write M * v. That’s handy and very readable.Other than that, no idea … Overloading operators can cause lots and lots of confusion. 🫤
+ and * in C++ to allow for visually appealing multiplication of matrices and vectors and that kind of thing. Allows you to write M * v. That’s handy and very readable.Other than that, no idea … Overloading operators can cause lots and lots of confusion. 🫤
(So, yeah, this is more of a rant against UI design and has nothing to do with the underlying “make 2 + 2 = 5” problem. 😅)=
(So, yeah, this is more of a rant against UI design and has nothing to do with the underlying “make 2 + 2 = 5” problem. 😅)=
(So, yeah, this is more of a rant against UI design and has nothing to do with the underlying “make 2 + 2 = 5” problem. 😅)=
4. What you don’t see is that this code box *scrolls to the right* – and there’s an a++ hidden off screen, hence the program prints 5 instead.I don’t know how much of this you experience first hand due to your sight impairment (I have a feeling that you use special settings that prevent this kind of thing): Lots and lots of UI elements these days are no longer recognizable as such (buttons without 3D bevel around them, hyperlinks without underline, …) or – as in this case – not visible at all. My GTK theme does not display a scroll bar for this text box. It only does so when I *hover over the box*. This is really bad in my opinion.
At work, with all the fancy modern software, I often feel like a complete idiot. I don’t know where to click – because hyperlinks or other “active elements” are not recognizable as such. I basically have to *try* and click *everywhere* just to find out. Horrible.
4. What you don’t see is that this code box *scrolls to the right* – and there’s an a++ hidden off screen, hence the program prints 5 instead.I don’t know how much of this you experience first hand due to your sight impairment (I have a feeling that you use special settings that prevent this kind of thing): Lots and lots of UI elements these days are no longer recognizable as such (buttons without 3D bevel around them, hyperlinks without underline, …) or – as in this case – not visible at all. My GTK theme does not display a scroll bar for this text box. It only does so when I *hover over the box*. This is really bad in my opinion.
At work, with all the fancy modern software, I often feel like a complete idiot. I don’t know where to click – because hyperlinks or other “active elements” are not recognizable as such. I basically have to *try* and click *everywhere* just to find out. Horrible.
4. What you don’t see is that this code box *scrolls to the right* – and there’s an a++ hidden off screen, hence the program prints 5 instead.I don’t know how much of this you experience first hand due to your sight impairment (I have a feeling that you use special settings that prevent this kind of thing): Lots and lots of UI elements these days are no longer recognizable as such (buttons without 3D bevel around them, hyperlinks without underline, …) or – as in this case – not visible at all. My GTK theme does not display a scroll bar for this text box. It only does so when I *hover over the box*. This is really bad in my opinion.
At work, with all the fancy modern software, I often feel like a complete idiot. I don’t know where to click – because hyperlinks or other “active elements” are not recognizable as such. I basically have to *try* and click *everywhere* just to find out. Horrible.
g CTRL-A in Vim. (See :help v_g_CTRL-A.) This could have saved my so much time and effort in the past …
g CTRL-A in Vim. (See :help v_g_CTRL-A.) This could have saved my so much time and effort in the past …
g CTRL-A in Vim. (See :help v_g_CTRL-A.) This could have saved my so much time and effort in the past …
2 + 2 = 5 in CIt is *SO DAMN* unnecessary. 🙄 Today’s UIs force you to hover everywhere and/or blindly click everywhere, just to see if there maybe somewhere is an element that responds to hover/click.
Bah! Bah! Now I’m angry. 🤣
2 + 2 = 5 in CIt is *SO DAMN* unnecessary. 🙄 Today’s UIs force you to hover everywhere and/or blindly click everywhere, just to see if there maybe somewhere is an element that responds to hover/click.
Bah! Bah! Now I’m angry. 🤣
2 + 2 = 5 in CIt is *SO DAMN* unnecessary. 🙄 Today’s UIs force you to hover everywhere and/or blindly click everywhere, just to see if there maybe somewhere is an element that responds to hover/click.
Bah! Bah! Now I’m angry. 🤣
$foo, go down five lines, now search for $bar from here, then change $x to $y in the matching line.”)
$foo, go down five lines, now search for $bar from here, then change $x to $y in the matching line.”)
$foo, go down five lines, now search for $bar from here, then change $x to $y in the matching line.”)
@tkanos Your PC burnt? 😨 Oh dear! Which course was that, though, do you remember?
@tkanos Your PC burnt? 😨 Oh dear! Which course was that, though, do you remember?
@tkanos Your PC burnt? 😨 Oh dear! Which course was that, though, do you remember?
https://adventofcode.com/2022
Anybody else doing it this year? Although, I shouldn’t ask that question. I really want to do it in Rust this year, and avoid all kinds of competition. 😅 (Competition would drive me to *not* using Rust, because I’m still not very productive with this language.)
https://adventofcode.com/2022
Anybody else doing it this year? Although, I shouldn’t ask that question. I really want to do it in Rust this year, and avoid all kinds of competition. 😅 (Competition would drive me to *not* using Rust, because I’m still not very productive with this language.)
https://adventofcode.com/2022
Anybody else doing it this year? Although, I shouldn’t ask that question. I really want to do it in Rust this year, and avoid all kinds of competition. 😅 (Competition would drive me to *not* using Rust, because I’m still not very productive with this language.)
Ich würde auf eine 8 tippen. Im Aktenzeichen (was ich ja geschwärzt hatte) ist eine 3 mit drin und die sieht deutlich anders aus. An anderer Stelle steht noch eine 2, die ist auch nochmal anders. All das kann das Detektivbüro Lyse natürlich nicht wissen. 😅
Ich würde auf eine 8 tippen. Im Aktenzeichen (was ich ja geschwärzt hatte) ist eine 3 mit drin und die sieht deutlich anders aus. An anderer Stelle steht noch eine 2, die ist auch nochmal anders. All das kann das Detektivbüro Lyse natürlich nicht wissen. 😅
Ich würde auf eine 8 tippen. Im Aktenzeichen (was ich ja geschwärzt hatte) ist eine 3 mit drin und die sieht deutlich anders aus. An anderer Stelle steht noch eine 2, die ist auch nochmal anders. All das kann das Detektivbüro Lyse natürlich nicht wissen. 😅
Trouble is, that popup appears *every time*.
Just now, I clicked “no, I do not want to donate” for a change. Turns out, now the popup is gone for good. 🥴
So I now have to click “no” all the time (because I don’t store cookies when the browser closes). This sends the wrong signal to Wikipedia. 😂 I do want to donate, I just want the damn popup to be gone.