# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
# 
# Usage:
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users              View list of users and latest twt date.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt                View all twts.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri  View all mentions for uri.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash         View all twts for a conversation subject.
# 
# Options:
#     uri     Filter to show a specific users twts.
#     offset  Start index for quey.
#     limit   Count of items to return (going back in time).
# 
# twt range = 1 28
# self = https://watcher.sour.is/conv/25d6gla
Anyway... Congrats @laz ๐ŸŽ‰ Proud new owner of the new tt.vltra.plus Yarn.social pod ๐Ÿฅณ -- What's this now, 4 pods now in the wild that aren't my own or managed by me? ๐Ÿค” Gonna have to start figuring out a way for the Yarns search engine to sart accounting for them? Or a way to identify them as a measure of "count"?
Anyway... Congrats @laz ๐ŸŽ‰ Proud new owner of the new tt.vltra.plus Yarn.social pod ๐Ÿฅณ -- What's this now, 4 pods now in the wild that aren't my own or managed by me? ๐Ÿค” Gonna have to start figuring out a way for the Yarns search engine to sart accounting for them? Or a way to identify them as a measure of "count"?
Thanks for the help! \n\nI was thinking, wouldn't it be good to have a user directory, like the list of feeds?\n\nEach pod can include a list of others pods. As new users on new pods (with not much activity) have to basically go to other pods to find users.
@laz I think the future integration with search will help with this?
@laz I think the future integration with search will help with this?
@prologic Nice to see the twtiverse grow. ๐Ÿ˜Š
@prologic Nice to see the twtiverse grow. ๐Ÿ˜Š
@prologic Nice to see the twtiverse grow. ๐Ÿ˜Š
@movq \n\n> Nice to see the twtiverse grow. ๐Ÿ˜Š\n\nTo be honest I'm never sure whether to call what we've collectively built and still grow and improve all the time "twt" or "yarn" ๐Ÿค” On one hand we've built up far more capabilities than the underlyling spec that underpins the "paltform". OTOH it's still _realy_ twtxt if you look under the covers ๐Ÿ˜‚ (Sorry @buckket ๐Ÿ˜‰)
@movq

> Nice to see the twtiverse grow. ๐Ÿ˜Š

To be honest I'm never sure whether to call what we've collectively built and still grow and improve all the time "twt" or "yarn" ๐Ÿค” On one hand we've built up far more capabilities than the underlyling spec that underpins the "paltform". OTOH it's still _realy_ twtxt if you look under the covers ๐Ÿ˜‚ (Sorry @buckket ๐Ÿ˜‰)
@movq

> Nice to see the twtiverse grow. ๐Ÿ˜Š

To be honest I'm never sure whether to call what we've collectively built and still grow and improve all the time "twt" or "yarn" ๐Ÿค” On one hand we've built up far more capabilities than the underlyling spec that underpins the "paltform". OTOH it's still _realy_ twtxt if you look under the covers ๐Ÿ˜‚ (Sorry @buckket ๐Ÿ˜‰)
@prologic @movq I would still call it twt. It's still plain text. โ˜บ
@prologic @movq I would still call it twt. It's still plain text. โ˜บ
@prologic @movq @adi yes yarn is "just" a client+server.\n\nMaybe call it txtverse
@prologic @movq @adi yes yarn is "just" a client+server.

Maybe call it txtverse
@darch @movq @adi

> yes yarn is โ€œjustโ€ a client+server

"Yarn" and "Yarn.social" is a collection of the extension:

- Twt Subject
- Twt Hash
- Avatars
- Metadata

The last two specs haven't been written yet, but we've talked about them extensively over the past year cc @lyse @xuu
@darch @movq @adi

> yes yarn is โ€œjustโ€ a client+server

"Yarn" and "Yarn.social" is a collection of the extension:

- Twt Subject
- Twt Hash
- Avatars
- Metadata

The last two specs haven't been written yet, but we've talked about them extensively over the past year cc @lyse @xuu
@darch @movq @adi \n\n> yes yarn is โ€œjustโ€ a client+server\n\n"Yarn" and "Yarn.social" is a collection of the extension:\n\n- Twt Subject\n- Twt Hash\n- Avatars\n- Metadata\n\nThe last two specs haven't been written yet, but we've talked about them extensively over the past year cc @lyse @xuu
@prologic @adi Well, from where Iโ€™m standing, itโ€™s just โ€œtwtxt + yarn threadsโ€. ๐Ÿ˜
@prologic @adi Well, from where Iโ€™m standing, itโ€™s just โ€œtwtxt + yarn threadsโ€. ๐Ÿ˜
@prologic @adi Well, from where Iโ€™m standing, itโ€™s just โ€œtwtxt + yarn threadsโ€. ๐Ÿ˜
@movq I like it ๐Ÿ˜‚ "yarn threads" ๐Ÿคฃ
@movq I like it ๐Ÿ˜‚ "yarn threads" ๐Ÿคฃ
@prologic @movq Ha ha. +1 for yarn threads. :-)
@prologic @movq @adi @darch @jlj Oh, right. I totally lost those two outstanding specs from my radar in the meantime. Sorry! :-( Maybe on Sunday I'll find some time, but no promises. Nicely put, movq, I fully agree.
@prologic Actually, leaving the user account's following and followers public serves as what I was thinking about.
@laz Yup ๐Ÿ‘Œ
@laz Yup ๐Ÿ‘Œ