yarnd setup
look like to anyone? 🤔 Let's say it exists, and it helps you setup a Yarn pod in seconds. What does it do? Of course I'd have to split out yarnd
itself into yarnd run
to _actually_ run the server/daemon part.
# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse. # # Usage: # https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users View list of users and latest twt date. # https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt View all twts. # https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri View all mentions for uri. # https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash View all twts for a conversation subject. # # Options: # uri Filter to show a specific users twts. # offset Start index for quey. # limit Count of items to return (going back in time). # # twt range = 1 26 # self = https://watcher.sour.is/conv/2tjsjuq
yarnd setup
look like to anyone? 🤔 Let's say it exists, and it helps you setup a Yarn pod in seconds. What does it do? Of course I'd have to split out yarnd
itself into yarnd run
to _actually_ run the server/daemon part.
yarnd setup
look like to anyone? 🤔 Let's say it exists, and it helps you setup a Yarn pod in seconds. What does it do? Of course I'd have to split out yarnd
itself into yarnd run
to _actually_ run the server/daemon part.
yarnd setup
is needed. 🤔COOKIE_SECRET
is optional which it isn’t), but it was a good experience overall.yarnd setup
nudges you (the author) into keeping those instructions short and concise. Whereas the existence of yarnd setup
means that you can cram everything and the kitchen sink in there, because it’s convenient. That can lead to a convoluted setup process – and me, the user, does not really know what that command really does, which is something that I, personally, don’t like. 😅
yarnd setup
is needed. 🤔COOKIE_SECRET
is optional which it isn’t), but it was a good experience overall.yarnd setup
nudges you (the author) into keeping those instructions short and concise. Whereas the existence of yarnd setup
means that you can cram everything and the kitchen sink in there, because it’s convenient. That can lead to a convoluted setup process – and me, the user, does not really know what that command really does, which is something that I, personally, don’t like. 😅
yarnd setup
is needed. 🤔COOKIE_SECRET
is optional which it isn’t), but it was a good experience overall.yarnd setup
nudges you (the author) into keeping those instructions short and concise. Whereas the existence of yarnd setup
means that you can cram everything and the kitchen sink in there, because it’s convenient. That can lead to a convoluted setup process – and me, the user, does not really know what that command really does, which is something that I, personally, don’t like. 😅
yarnd setup
is needed. 🤔COOKIE_SECRET
is optional which it isn’t), but it was a good experience overall.yarnd setup
nudges you (the author) into keeping those instructions short and concise. Whereas the existence of yarnd setup
means that you can cram everything and the kitchen sink in there, because it’s convenient. That can lead to a convoluted setup process – and me, the user, does not really know what that command really does, which is something that I, personally, don’t like. 😅
~/go/bin
to your $PATH
, at least I did. I’m not sure what to do about it, though. 🤔 This doesn’t really belong into Yarn’s setup guide and it’s mentioned as one of the first things in the Arch wiki, for example, but still … To newcomers this might look a bit like a broken build process:
openbsd$ gmake server
/bin/sh: minify: not found
/bin/sh: minify: not found
/bin/sh: minify: not found
gmake: *** [Makefile:84: generate] Error 127
~/go/bin
to your $PATH
, at least I did. I’m not sure what to do about it, though. 🤔 This doesn’t really belong into Yarn’s setup guide and it’s mentioned as one of the first things in the Arch wiki, for example, but still … To newcomers this might look a bit like a broken build process:
openbsd$ gmake server
/bin/sh: minify: not found
/bin/sh: minify: not found
/bin/sh: minify: not found
gmake: *** [Makefile:84: generate] Error 127
~/go/bin
to your $PATH
, at least I did. I’m not sure what to do about it, though. 🤔 This doesn’t really belong into Yarn’s setup guide and it’s mentioned as one of the first things in the Arch wiki, for example, but still … To newcomers this might look a bit like a broken build process:
openbsd$ gmake server
/bin/sh: minify: not found
/bin/sh: minify: not found
/bin/sh: minify: not found
gmake: *** [Makefile:84: generate] Error 127
~/go/bin
to your $PATH
, at least I did. I’m not sure what to do about it, though. 🤔 This doesn’t really belong into Yarn’s setup guide and it’s mentioned as one of the first things in the Arch wiki, for example, but still … To newcomers this might look a bit like a broken build process:
openbsd$ gmake server
/bin/sh: minify: not found
/bin/sh: minify: not found
/bin/sh: minify: not found
gmake: *** [Makefile:84: generate] Error 127
date -Is
, which doesn’t exist on OpenBSD. Not sure how relevant this platform is for you, though. 😅date '+%FT%T%z'
is the closest approximation that works on both GNU and OpenBSD, but it doesn’t include a colon in the time zone offset, so it’s 0200
instead of 02:00
. 🤦 I’m not sure if this is ISO8601 compliant. And it’s still not POSIX. 🤦 Well, I tried. 😂
date -Is
, which doesn’t exist on OpenBSD. Not sure how relevant this platform is for you, though. 😅date '+%FT%T%z'
is the closest approximation that works on both GNU and OpenBSD, but it doesn’t include a colon in the time zone offset, so it’s 0200
instead of 02:00
. 🤦 I’m not sure if this is ISO8601 compliant. And it’s still not POSIX. 🤦 Well, I tried. 😂
date -Is
, which doesn’t exist on OpenBSD. Not sure how relevant this platform is for you, though. 😅date '+%FT%T%z'
is the closest approximation that works on both GNU and OpenBSD, but it doesn’t include a colon in the time zone offset, so it’s 0200
instead of 02:00
. 🤦 I’m not sure if this is ISO8601 compliant. And it’s still not POSIX. 🤦 Well, I tried. 😂
date -Is
, which doesn’t exist on OpenBSD. Not sure how relevant this platform is for you, though. 😅date '+%FT%T%z'
is the closest approximation that works on both GNU and OpenBSD, but it doesn’t include a colon in the time zone offset, so it’s 0200
instead of 02:00
. 🤦 I’m not sure if this is ISO8601 compliant. And it’s still not POSIX. 🤦 Well, I tried. 😂
git show -s --pretty=format:%cI
BUIDL
thing. Was it always suppose to be the commit timestamp? 🤔
BUIDL
thing. Was it always suppose to be the commit timestamp? 🤔