# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
# 
# Usage:
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users              View list of users and latest twt date.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt                View all twts.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri  View all mentions for uri.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash         View all twts for a conversation subject.
# 
# Options:
#     uri     Filter to show a specific users twts.
#     offset  Start index for quey.
#     limit   Count of items to return (going back in time).
# 
# twt range = 1 25
# self = https://watcher.sour.is/conv/3kwz76a
So the mkws web site is not only for hackers, it's for everybody willing to learn some shell script to create a static web site, it does have references to hacker culture let's say but there's no reason to hide that because they can be explained.
So maybe you took a little bit personally, wasn't indented that way at all.
That's one of the reasons I preferred the twt.social name because it shows its origins in sight, even tho it has roots in hacker culture, those roots can be explained and understood by anybody. It's very inclusive and not elite at all.
@adi \n\n> is not only for hackers, it’s for everybody willing to learn some shell script to create a static web site\n\n**everybody** here is quite subjective. My wife @kit84 for example _would_ probably never use a static site generator, even if she wanted to create a website. She'd probably get me to do it 😂 or use something like Wix 😂
@adi

> is not only for hackers, it’s for everybody willing to learn some shell script to create a static web site

**everybody** here is quite subjective. My wife @kit84 for example _would_ probably never use a static site generator, even if she wanted to create a website. She'd probably get me to do it 😂 or use something like Wix 😂
@adi

> is not only for hackers, it’s for everybody willing to learn some shell script to create a static web site

**everybody** here is quite subjective. My wife @kit84 for example _would_ probably never use a static site generator, even if she wanted to create a website. She'd probably get me to do it 😂 or use something like Wix 😂
@adi

> So maybe you took a little bit personally, wasn’t indented that way at all.

I apologize, I **am** super tired (_haven't slept well for days!_); I was just getting a little annoyed at the short responses 🤗
@adi

> So maybe you took a little bit personally, wasn’t indented that way at all.

I apologize, I **am** super tired (_haven't slept well for days!_); I was just getting a little annoyed at the short responses 🤗
@adi \n\n> So maybe you took a little bit personally, wasn’t indented that way at all.\n\nI apologize, I **am** super tired (_haven't slept well for days!_); I was just getting a little annoyed at the short responses 🤗
@adi

> That’s one of the reasons I preferred the twt.social name because it shows its origins in sight, even tho it has roots in hacker culture, those roots can be explained and understood by anybody. It’s very inclusive and not elite at all.

Unfortunately it was a _poor_ choice of project/brand name really and it was _too_ close to "Twtxt" which some folks got quite upset over (_I won't name naems_). Yarn.social will _hopefully_ always have roots in "hacker" culture and continue to use the Twtxt spec under the hood, but, in all honesty...
@adi

> That’s one of the reasons I preferred the twt.social name because it shows its origins in sight, even tho it has roots in hacker culture, those roots can be explained and understood by anybody. It’s very inclusive and not elite at all.

Unfortunately it was a _poor_ choice of project/brand name really and it was _too_ close to "Twtxt" which some folks got quite upset over (_I won't name naems_). Yarn.social will _hopefully_ always have roots in "hacker" culture and continue to use the Twtxt spec under the hood, but, in all honesty...
@adi \n\n> That’s one of the reasons I preferred the twt.social name because it shows its origins in sight, even tho it has roots in hacker culture, those roots can be explained and understood by anybody. It’s very inclusive and not elite at all.\n\nUnfortunately it was a _poor_ choice of project/brand name really and it was _too_ close to "Twtxt" which some folks got quite upset over (_I won't name naems_). Yarn.social will _hopefully_ always have roots in "hacker" culture and continue to use the Twtxt spec under the hood, but, in all honesty...
... Yarn is a better more apt descirption of what we're set out to build here. It has all the right connotations and meaning.
... Yarn is a better more apt descirption of what we're set out to build here. It has all the right connotations and meaning.
@prologic There is a chance she _might_ get there. Might ask you to do it at first, might ask for updates and some point would say "teach me how, I don't want to bother you".
@adi I highly doubt that 🤣
@adi I highly doubt that 🤣
@prologic Tell that to my sister. She was running Ubuntu for a while. I believe she could actually perform merges.
@adi But could she emerge -avuDN --with-bdeps=y --changed-deps @world on Gentoo? Those are the _real_ questions here 🤣
@eldersnake Oh, that doesn't fit my definition of "simple".
make is not that hard to comprehend.
@adi I know, I was kidding. Not even I use Gentoo 😋
@adi I must admit I've found Makefile syntax a little challenging at times.
@eldersnake Agree on that, but I was speaking about the command itself.
@eldersnake That's one of the reasons I chose shell instead of Makfile even though it might seem more fit.