# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
#
# Usage:
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users View list of users and latest twt date.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt View all twts.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri View all mentions for uri.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash View all twts for a conversation subject.
#
# Options:
# uri Filter to show a specific users twts.
# offset Start index for quey.
# limit Count of items to return (going back in time).
#
# twt range = 1 27
# self = https://watcher.sour.is/conv/3xfftqq
@movq I get #tkdjrmq, too. Let's see.
@movq \nI replied to the one he originally sent (and later edited, so it was deleted). That's probably what happened.
@movq
I replied to the one he originally sent (and later edited, so it was deleted). That's probably what happened.
@quark Ahhh, ohhh. That explains it. I was confused by the fact that this URL exists: https://f.adi.onl/conv/egdmpoa – so I was assuming that this is the correct twt/hash. Apparently, it’s just the original version of his twt which is still in his cache?
@quark Ahhh, ohhh. That explains it. I was confused by the fact that this URL exists: https://f.adi.onl/conv/egdmpoa – so I was assuming that this is the correct twt/hash. Apparently, it’s just the original version of his twt which is still in his cache?
@quark Ahhh, ohhh. That explains it. I was confused by the fact that this URL exists: https://f.adi.onl/conv/egdmpoa – so I was assuming that this is the correct twt/hash. Apparently, it’s just the original version of his twt which is still in his cache?
@movq @quark this is what I see at my end (quark forked the original/edited one):\n\n 
@lyse Okay, this wasn’t my intention, but now I somehow hope that this test makes it into the repo and the little cricket story stays there forever. 🤣
I think @quark is right, though. When I browse @adi’s front page, I see this: 
The twt with the wrong hash is probably just a cache artifact … 🤔
@lyse Okay, this wasn’t my intention, but now I somehow hope that this test makes it into the repo and the little cricket story stays there forever. 🤣
I think @quark is right, though. When I browse @adi’s front page, I see this: The twt with the wrong hash is probably just a cache artifact … 🤔
@lyse Okay, this wasn’t my intention, but now I somehow hope that this test makes it into the repo and the little cricket story stays there forever. 🤣\n\nI think @quark is right, though. When I browse @adi’s front page, I see this: The twt with the wrong hash is probably just a cache artifact … 🤔
@lyse Okay, this wasn’t my intention, but now I somehow hope that this test makes it into the repo and the little cricket story stays there forever. 🤣
I think @quark is right, though. When I browse @adi’s front page, I see this: The twt with the wrong hash is probably just a cache artifact … 🤔
@movq \n>and the little cricket story stays there forever.\n\n🤣🤣🤣
@movq
>and the little cricket story stays there forever.
🤣🤣🤣
@movq @quark So you want me to send a merge request? :->
@lyse Kind of. 🤣 I mean, I could also add it to jenny’s suite. 🤣
@lyse Kind of. 🤣 I mean, I could also add it to jenny’s suite. 🤣
@lyse Kind of. 🤣 I mean, I could also add it to jenny’s suite. 🤣
I get #tkdjrmq instead. 🤔 I uploaded the payload that I’m hashing here: https://movq.de/v/fe54d02fe3/hash-payload.txt cc @lyse @prologic