# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
#
# Usage:
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users View list of users and latest twt date.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt View all twts.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri View all mentions for uri.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash View all twts for a conversation subject.
#
# Options:
# uri Filter to show a specific users twts.
# offset Start index for quey.
# limit Count of items to return (going back in time).
#
# twt range = 1 23
# self = https://watcher.sour.is/conv/62vi2ma
I’m thinking about moving my blog/page from uninformativ.de over to movq.de (because the name “uninformativ.de” really isn’t great, never has been). How much in the twtxt/Yarn world will that break? 😂 I’ll obviously install redirects, so it should be relatively painless, right?
I’m thinking about moving my blog/page from uninformativ.de over to movq.de (because the name “uninformativ.de” really isn’t great, never has been). How much in the twtxt/Yarn world will that break? 😂 I’ll obviously install redirects, so it should be relatively painless, right?
I’m thinking about moving my blog/page from uninformativ.de over to movq.de (because the name “uninformativ.de” really isn’t great, never has been). How much in the twtxt/Yarn world will that break? 😂 I’ll obviously install redirects, so it should be relatively painless, right?
@movq movq.de is cool. I don't see any problem as long as you set up redirects.
@movq FWIW, I find "uninformativ" quite cool. :-) When you move, my client will show me duplicates, as my parser doesn't look at the first `url` meta data field but uses the feed URL instead. I think. It's been too long since I worked on that. Either I implement the spec correctly or I simply do not change the subscription URL.
@movq FWIW I always liked uninformativ.de myself 😅 However that being said, as @lyse points out, you'd only need to shove a # url = on any old feed files you move across, and I'd start with a new empty feed once you migrate over. I _think_ 🤔 Moving feed locations affects the way individual Twts are hashed, as the Twtxt spec never had the concept of an "identity" the location of your feed more-or-less becomes your identity or the first # url = field in your feed's metadata.
@movq FWIW I always liked uninformativ.de myself 😅 However that being said, as @lyse points out, you'd only need to shove a # url = on any old feed files you move across, and I'd start with a new empty feed once you migrate over. I _think_ 🤔 Moving feed locations affects the way individual Twts are hashed, as the Twtxt spec never had the concept of an "identity" the location of your feed more-or-less becomes your identity or the first # url = field in your feed's metadata.
@movq FWIW I always liked uninformativ.de myself 😅 However that being said, as @lyse points out, you'd only need to shove a # url = on any old feed files you move across, and I'd start with a new empty feed once you migrate over. I _think_ 🤔 Moving feed locations affects the way individual Twts are hashed, as the Twtxt spec never had the concept of an "identity" the location of your feed more-or-less becomes your identity or the first # url = field in your feed's metadata.
@prologic Ahhh, right, the hashes. 🤔
We’ll see. I’ve been using that domain for almost 20 years now, maybe I’ll just keep it. 😅
@prologic Ahhh, right, the hashes. 🤔
We’ll see. I’ve been using that domain for almost 20 years now, maybe I’ll just keep it. 😅
@prologic Ahhh, right, the hashes. 🤔
We’ll see. I’ve been using that domain for almost 20 years now, maybe I’ll just keep it. 😅
There are sooooooooo many references to that domain. Everything would be littered with HTTP redirects – forever. Bah. 😞
There are sooooooooo many references to that domain. Everything would be littered with HTTP redirects – forever. Bah. 😞
There are sooooooooo many references to that domain. Everything would be littered with HTTP redirects – forever. Bah. 😞
One last thing, @movq. I really do like that interesting stuff is hosted at uninformativ.de. Not only is this great irony, but it suggests that you don't take yourself too seriously. I love that. When I first encountered your domain I thought – and still do – that it is a funny name. Anyway, don't wanna push you.
@lyse I appreciate that, thanks. 😅 I can’t really explain why I don’t like it that much, to be honest. 🤔 It’s good and interesting to hear some outside perspectives. 👍
@lyse I appreciate that, thanks. 😅 I can’t really explain why I don’t like it that much, to be honest. 🤔 It’s good and interesting to hear some outside perspectives. 👍
@lyse I appreciate that, thanks. 😅 I can’t really explain why I don’t like it that much, to be honest. 🤔 It’s good and interesting to hear some outside perspectives. 👍
well, I like that name uninformativ.de ! Has more personality than the other one, I think