# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
# 
# Usage:
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users              View list of users and latest twt date.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt                View all twts.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri  View all mentions for uri.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash         View all twts for a conversation subject.
# 
# Options:
#     uri     Filter to show a specific users twts.
#     offset  Start index for quey.
#     limit   Count of items to return (going back in time).
# 
# twt range = 1 61
# self = https://watcher.sour.is/conv/6ek4rvq
@prologic @lucidiot @movq So, apparently yarn is transforming hashtags into search urls, ob the feed. This makes things unreadable and seems totally unnecessary. Shouldn't this be a client feature? Why should my feed have a link to a search engine instead of a hashtag? And why can't the client (when it is a visual client like goryon or the web) react to hashtags (all of them) by linking to a search interface? Am I missing something?
@marado Hold up... Rewriting #hashtags was abolished long ago... Where are you seeing this? 😳
@marado Hold up... Rewriting #hashtags was abolished long ago... Where are you seeing this? 😳
@marado Hold up... Rewriting #hashtags was abolished long ago... Where are you seeing this? 😳
@marado Hold up... Rewriting #hashtags was abolished long ago... Where are you seeing this? 😳
@marado Hold up... Rewriting #hashtags was abolished long ago... Where are you seeing this? 😳
@marado The previous Twt in this thread was written to the feed as:


2022-12-21T00:46:36Z\t(#6ek4rvq) @<marado https://twtxt.net/user/marado/twtxt.txt> Hold up... Rewriting #<hashtags https://twtxt.net/search?tag=hashtags> was abolished long ago... Where are you seeing this? 😳


Which is what I expect. Whoooah wait up... wtf?! 😒 @xuu I _thought_ we nuked this shit years ago?! πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ
@marado The previous Twt in this thread was written to the feed as:


2022-12-21T00:46:36Z	(#6ek4rvq) @<marado https://twtxt.net/user/marado/twtxt.txt> Hold up... Rewriting #<hashtags https://twtxt.net/search?tag=hashtags> was abolished long ago... Where are you seeing this? 😳


Which is what I expect. Whoooah wait up... wtf?! 😒 @xuu I _thought_ we nuked this shit years ago?! πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ
@marado The previous Twt in this thread was written to the feed as:


2022-12-21T00:46:36Z	(#6ek4rvq) @<marado https://twtxt.net/user/marado/twtxt.txt> Hold up... Rewriting #<hashtags https://twtxt.net/search?tag=hashtags> was abolished long ago... Where are you seeing this? 😳


Which is what I expect. Whoooah wait up... wtf?! 😒 @xuu I _thought_ we nuked this shit years ago?! πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ
@marado The previous Twt in this thread was written to the feed as:


2022-12-21T00:46:36Z	(#6ek4rvq) @<marado https://twtxt.net/user/marado/twtxt.txt> Hold up... Rewriting #<hashtags https://twtxt.net/search?tag=hashtags> was abolished long ago... Where are you seeing this? 😳


Which is what I expect. Whoooah wait up... wtf?! 😒 @xuu I _thought_ we nuked this shit years ago?! πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ
@marado The previous Twt in this thread was written to the feed as:


2022-12-21T00:46:36Z	(#6ek4rvq) @<marado https://twtxt.net/user/marado/twtxt.txt> Hold up... Rewriting #<hashtags https://twtxt.net/search?tag=hashtags> was abolished long ago... Where are you seeing this? 😳


Which is what I expect. Whoooah wait up... wtf?! 😒 @xuu I _thought_ we nuked this shit years ago?! πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ
Actually... I don't get it... Did we say we'd remove this shit and just didn't do it for some stupid ass reason?! πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ I can't find any evidence in any of the codebases where we've gone and done this 😳
Actually... I don't get it... Did we say we'd remove this shit and just didn't do it for some stupid ass reason?! πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ I can't find any evidence in any of the codebases where we've gone and done this 😳
Actually... I don't get it... Did we say we'd remove this shit and just didn't do it for some stupid ass reason?! πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ I can't find any evidence in any of the codebases where we've gone and done this 😳
Actually... I don't get it... Did we say we'd remove this shit and just didn't do it for some stupid ass reason?! πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ I can't find any evidence in any of the codebases where we've gone and done this 😳
@xuu @lyse help πŸ˜…
@xuu @lyse help πŸ˜…
@xuu @lyse help πŸ˜…
@xuu @lyse help πŸ˜…
@marado I'm so sorry, after poking around a fair bit, I've realised. We intended to update the extension and remove the code/behaviour ages ago, but we just haven't gotten around to it πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ -- Could I ask either @movq or @lyse to update the spec whilst I fix this goddamn code? (PR incoming)
@marado I'm so sorry, after poking around a fair bit, I've realised. We intended to update the extension and remove the code/behaviour ages ago, but we just haven't gotten around to it πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ -- Could I ask either @movq or @lyse to update the spec whilst I fix this goddamn code? (PR incoming)
@marado I'm so sorry, after poking around a fair bit, I've realised. We intended to update the extension and remove the code/behaviour ages ago, but we just haven't gotten around to it πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ -- Could I ask either @movq or @lyse to update the spec whilst I fix this goddamn code? (PR incoming)
@marado I'm so sorry, after poking around a fair bit, I've realised. We intended to update the extension and remove the code/behaviour ages ago, but we just haven't gotten around to it πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ -- Could I ask either @movq or @lyse to update the spec whilst I fix this goddamn code? (PR incoming)
@movq @lyse @prologic As long as it doesn't end forgotten, there's really no rush! It's not like @lucidot is going to revert their decision with this change...
@movq @lyse @prologic As long as it doesn't end forgotten, there's really no rush! It's not like @lucidot is going to revert their decision with this change...
@marado Still I feel bad now 😒 Anyway, here's the PR so far... Just need to work out why this test is failing and blowing up in my face πŸ€” https://git.mills.io/yarnsocial/go-lextwt/pulls/9
@marado Still I feel bad now 😒 Anyway, here's the PR so far... Just need to work out why this test is failing and blowing up in my face πŸ€” https://git.mills.io/yarnsocial/go-lextwt/pulls/9
@marado Still I feel bad now 😒 Anyway, here's the PR so far... Just need to work out why this test is failing and blowing up in my face πŸ€” https://git.mills.io/yarnsocial/go-lextwt/pulls/9
@marado Still I feel bad now 😒 Anyway, here's the PR so far... Just need to work out why this test is failing and blowing up in my face πŸ€” https://git.mills.io/yarnsocial/go-lextwt/pulls/9
@prologic We abolished this for the subject hashes (like the #6ek4rvq here), but it appears we totally forgot about β€œnormal” hash tags. πŸ₯΄
@prologic We abolished this for the subject hashes (like the #6ek4rvq here), but it appears we totally forgot about β€œnormal” hash tags. πŸ₯΄
@prologic We abolished this for the subject hashes (like the #6ek4rvq here), but it appears we totally forgot about β€œnormal” hash tags. πŸ₯΄
@prologic We abolished this for the subject hashes (like the #6ek4rvq here), but it appears we totally forgot about β€œnormal” hash tags. πŸ₯΄
@movq Oh! You are so right! πŸ˜… Why didn't we kill that at the same time too 🀣
@movq Oh! You are so right! πŸ˜… Why didn't we kill that at the same time too 🀣
@movq Oh! You are so right! πŸ˜… Why didn't we kill that at the same time too 🀣
@movq Oh! You are so right! πŸ˜… Why didn't we kill that at the same time too 🀣
@movq Do you mind updating the spec while @xuu and I fix the code? πŸ™
@movq Do you mind updating the spec while @xuu and I fix the code? πŸ™
@movq Do you mind updating the spec while @xuu and I fix the code? πŸ™
@movq Do you mind updating the spec while @xuu and I fix the code? πŸ™
@prologic I’ll have a look. πŸ‘Œ
@prologic I’ll have a look. πŸ‘Œ
@prologic I’ll have a look. πŸ‘Œ
@prologic I’ll have a look. πŸ‘Œ
@movq Thank you! πŸ™
@movq Thank you! πŸ™
@movq Thank you! πŸ™
@movq Thank you! πŸ™
@prologic btw, dev.twtxt.net could use an update. πŸ˜… This page, for example, still shows the old version: https://dev.twtxt.net/doc/twtsubjectextension.html
@prologic btw, dev.twtxt.net could use an update. πŸ˜… This page, for example, still shows the old version: https://dev.twtxt.net/doc/twtsubjectextension.html
@prologic btw, dev.twtxt.net could use an update. πŸ˜… This page, for example, still shows the old version: https://dev.twtxt.net/doc/twtsubjectextension.html
@prologic btw, dev.twtxt.net could use an update. πŸ˜… This page, for example, still shows the old version: https://dev.twtxt.net/doc/twtsubjectextension.html
@movq Ahh crap, yeah I never setup CD for it πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ -- Might one day redo the site entirely using zs πŸ€”
@movq Ahh crap, yeah I never setup CD for it πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ -- Might one day redo the site entirely using zs πŸ€”
@movq Ahh crap, yeah I never setup CD for it πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ -- Might one day redo the site entirely using zs πŸ€”
@movq Ahh crap, yeah I never setup CD for it πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ -- Might one day redo the site entirely using zs πŸ€”
@marado This has been fixed now as you can see in https://twtxt.net/conv/cbbmijq -- Thanks for reporting πŸ™
@marado This has been fixed now as you can see in https://twtxt.net/conv/cbbmijq -- Thanks for reporting πŸ™
@marado This has been fixed now as you can see in https://twtxt.net/conv/cbbmijq -- Thanks for reporting πŸ™
@marado This has been fixed now as you can see in https://twtxt.net/conv/cbbmijq -- Thanks for reporting πŸ™