# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
# 
# Usage:
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users              View list of users and latest twt date.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt                View all twts.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri  View all mentions for uri.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash         View all twts for a conversation subject.
# 
# Options:
#     uri     Filter to show a specific users twts.
#     offset  Start index for quey.
#     limit   Count of items to return (going back in time).
# 
# twt range = 1 22
# self = https://watcher.sour.is/conv/a4mug4q
to see what it does, check this one: https://arrakis.netbros.com/twt/l2thfrq
@fastidious I donโ€™t see a difference on the mobile web version? ๐Ÿค”
@fastidious I donโ€™t see a difference on the mobile web version? ๐Ÿค”
@prologic no, it is more evident on the desktop. What it does is changing images/videos width to 100%, filling the entire twt space. Looks very nice on the web.
@fastidious screenshot?
@fastidious screenshot?
On Arrakis: \n
On TWTXT:\n\n
so the important change here is the automatic height? ๐Ÿค” can you send a pull request upstream to update the default built-in theme? ๐Ÿค—
so the important change here is the automatic height? ๐Ÿค” can you send a pull request upstream to update the default built-in theme? ๐Ÿค—
@prologic sure thing. There is a caveat: if the image is small, or very small, it will stretch it to the 100% width of the twt (the height will continue to be automatically computed). Are you OK with that?
@fastidious Iโ€™m not sure ๐Ÿ˜†๐Ÿค”
@fastidious Iโ€™m not sure ๐Ÿ˜†๐Ÿค”
@prologic example. This image is 788x834 pixels, a small one.\n\n
see now it shows on Arrakis: https://arrakis.netbros.com/twt/ywbglia
@fastidious 788 x 834 is considered small?! ๐Ÿ˜ณ
@fastidious 788 x 834 is considered small?! ๐Ÿ˜ณ
@fastidious I donโ€™t see an issue but of course Iโ€™m on the mobile app and on my phone away from my desktop so I can only view the mobile version of the web in the face as well ๐Ÿ˜†
@fastidious I donโ€™t see an issue but of course Iโ€™m on the mobile app and on my phone away from my desktop so I can only view the mobile version of the web in the face as well ๐Ÿ˜†
@prologic \n> 788 x 834 is considered small?!\n\nMy desktop is an iMac 27โ€ 4K. In such display, that image is small indeed.
@fastidious yes but resolutions and screen sizes are two different things arenโ€™t they? ๐Ÿค”
@fastidious yes but resolutions and screen sizes are two different things arenโ€™t they? ๐Ÿค”