# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
#
# Usage:
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users View list of users and latest twt date.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt View all twts.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri View all mentions for uri.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash View all twts for a conversation subject.
#
# Options:
# uri Filter to show a specific users twts.
# offset Start index for quey.
# limit Count of items to return (going back in time).
#
# twt range = 1 14
# self = https://watcher.sour.is/conv/a4sjc7a
Do you agree that being "for" or "against" something is different than "agreeing" or "disagreeing" with that thing?
@adi Absolutely: the former pair imply much stronger allegiance. The latter can be but a ripple on the surface of a conversation between esteemed colleagues. 🙂
@adi Absolutely: the former pair imply much stronger allegiance. The latter can be but a ripple on the surface of a conversation between esteemed colleagues. 🙂
Yeah I agree with @jlj 🤣
Yeah I agree with @jlj 🤣
Yeah I agree with @jlj 🤣
True, but between non-esteemed colleagues, disagreements are now often seen as being (strongly) in opposition, or reimagined as for the reverse.
True, but between non-esteemed colleagues, disagreements are now often seen as being (strongly) in opposition, or reimagined as for the reverse.
I believe being "against" something is an aggressively conflictual situation while disagreeing with something is not necessarily conflictual and if conflictual not an aggressive one. Being "against" something is a form of war while disagreeing opens a way to debate.
I believe being "against" something is an aggressively conflictual situation while disagreeing with something is not necessarily conflictual and if conflictual not an aggressive one. Being "against" something is a form of war while disagreeing opens a way to debate.
I believe being "against" something is an aggressively conflictual situation while disagreeing with something is not necessarily conflictual and if conflictual not an aggressive one. Being "against" something is a form of war while disagreeing opens a way to debate.
@adi People confuse being "for" or "against" with "agreeing" or "disagreeing" which is literally a recipe for disaster.
@adi People confuse being "for" or "against" with "agreeing" or "disagreeing" which is literally a recipe for disaster.
@adi People confuse being "for" or "against" with "agreeing" or "disagreeing" which is literally a recipe for disaster.