# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
# 
# Usage:
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users              View list of users and latest twt date.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt                View all twts.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri  View all mentions for uri.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash         View all twts for a conversation subject.
# 
# Options:
#     uri     Filter to show a specific users twts.
#     offset  Start index for quey.
#     limit   Count of items to return (going back in time).
# 
# twt range = 1 9
# self = https://watcher.sour.is/conv/abupyoa
abucci
anthony.buc.ci
View Thread
Time to add


<meta name=”googlebot” content=”noindex,nofollow”>


to everything I guess.
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@abucci You're assuming Google will respect the nofollow,noindex instruction? 🤔
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@abucci You're assuming Google will respect the nofollow,noindex instruction? 🤔
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@abucci You're assuming Google will respect the nofollow,noindex instruction? 🤔
abucci
anthony.buc.ci
View Thread
@prologic That's definitely a concern. I guess it's a way to signal unequivocally that you don't want the page indexed. If they do it anyway, they don't really have an excuse to fall back on--they just blatantly violated your web site's policy.
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@abucci There are two problems I can see:

_ Google can basically do whatever they want
- You as a website owner have no legal recourse_
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@abucci There are two problems I can see:

_ Google can basically do whatever they want
- You as a website owner have no legal recourse_
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@abucci There are two problems I can see:

_ Google can basically do whatever they want
- You as a website owner have no legal recourse_
abucci
anthony.buc.ci
View Thread
@prologic It's true. I think the key point is to make it 100% clear what your intentions are, so that if there ever *is* a legal case against Google, they cannot credibly pretend not to have known.