# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
#
# Usage:
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users View list of users and latest twt date.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt View all twts.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri View all mentions for uri.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash View all twts for a conversation subject.
#
# Options:
# uri Filter to show a specific users twts.
# offset Start index for quey.
# limit Count of items to return (going back in time).
#
# twt range = 1 23
# self = https://watcher.sour.is/conv/akqtela
@sjkelleyjr Congrats on another great Console edition! 🎉
@sjkelleyjr Congrats on another great Console edition! 🎉
@sjkelleyjr Congrats on another great Console edition! 🎉
Interesting stuff in this week's 😀\n\n> Docker is the wrong solution to the right problem. The value is in software distribution, and there are better tools for that (even vagrant was better).\n\nI'm not entirely sure I agree with this statement 🤔 Having been with Docker since the start and also familiar with and used Vagrant in anger, yes, I agree Docker is great for "packaging" and "distributions", but I wouldn't go so far as to say there are better tools, certainly not Vagrant (_horribly networking for one_).
Interesting stuff in this week's 😀\n\n> Docker is the wrong solution to the right problem. The value is in software distribution, and there are better tools for that (even vagrant was better).\n\nI'm not entirely sure I agree with this statement 🤔 Having been with Docker since the start and also familiar with and used Vagrant in anger, yes, I agree Docker is great for "packaging" and "distributions", but I wouldn't go so far as to say there are better tools, certainly not Vagrant (_horribly networking for one_).
Interesting stuff in this week's 😀
> Docker is the wrong solution to the right problem. The value is in software distribution, and there are better tools for that (even vagrant was better).
I'm not entirely sure I agree with this statement 🤔 Having been with Docker since the start and also familiar with and used Vagrant in anger, yes, I agree Docker is great for "packaging" and "distributions", but I wouldn't go so far as to say there are better tools, certainly not Vagrant (_horribly networking for one_).
Interesting stuff in this week's 😀
> Docker is the wrong solution to the right problem. The value is in software distribution, and there are better tools for that (even vagrant was better).
I'm not entirely sure I agree with this statement 🤔 Having been with Docker since the start and also familiar with and used Vagrant in anger, yes, I agree Docker is great for "packaging" and "distributions", but I wouldn't go so far as to say there are better tools, certainly not Vagrant (_horribly networking for one_).
@prologic Thanks!
Yeah, I thought that viewpoint was a bit extreme, but I'd never used Vagrant before. I try not to push back too heavily on people during the interviews because I don't want the newsletter to get a reputation for being divisive, for fear of people avoiding being interviewed. Usually I would have asked some questions such that Marc would have qualified his statement a bit, but again, since I wasn't familiar with Vagrant I had to let it be.
You should have brought this up in the Discord server! This is exactly the case I created it for.
@prologic Thanks!\n\nYeah, I thought that viewpoint was a bit extreme, but I'd never used Vagrant before. I try not to push back too heavily on people during the interviews because I don't want the newsletter to get a reputation for being divisive, for fear of people avoiding being interviewed. Usually I would have asked some questions such that Marc would have qualified his statement a bit, but again, since I wasn't familiar with Vagrant I had to let it be.\n\nYou should have brought this up in the Discord server! This is exactly the case I created it for.
@prologic Thanks!\n\nYeah, I thought that viewpoint was a bit extreme, but I'd never used Vagrant before. I try not to push back too heavily on people during the interviews because I don't want the newsletter to get a reputation for being divisive, for fear of people avoiding being interviewed. Usually I would have asked some questions such that Marc would have qualified his statement a bit, but again, since I wasn't familiar with Vagrant I had to let it be.\n\nYou should have brought this up in the Discord server! This is exactly the case I created it for.
@sjkelleyjr And you shouldn’t! Your newsletter is neutral and factual. 👌 Also really valuable !
@sjkelleyjr And you shouldn’t! Your newsletter is neutral and factual. 👌 Also really valuable !
@sjkelleyjr And you shouldn’t! Your newsletter is neutral and factual. 👌 Also really valuable !
Yeah I could have a chat with him on Discord for sure 😁
Yeah I could have a chat with him on Discord for sure 😁
Yeah I could have a chat with him on Discord for sure 😁
@prologic thank you! Yes neutral is important! \n\nFun fact, the newsletter started as a typical Ben Thompson style thing, then I thought "no one cares what you have to say, just focus on providing something you'd be interested in", and Console was born! so I specifically try to pack as much value as I can into the emails and keep my opinions out of it.
@prologic thank you! Yes neutral is important!
Fun fact, the newsletter started as a typical Ben Thompson style thing, then I thought "no one cares what you have to say, just focus on providing something you'd be interested in", and Console was born! so I specifically try to pack as much value as I can into the emails and keep my opinions out of it.
@prologic thank you! Yes neutral is important! \n\nFun fact, the newsletter started as a typical Ben Thompson style thing, then I thought "no one cares what you have to say, just focus on providing something you'd be interested in", and Console was born! so I specifically try to pack as much value as I can into the emails and keep my opinions out of it.