# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
#
# Usage:
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users View list of users and latest twt date.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt View all twts.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri View all mentions for uri.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash View all twts for a conversation subject.
#
# Options:
# uri Filter to show a specific users twts.
# offset Start index for quey.
# limit Count of items to return (going back in time).
#
# twt range = 1 10
# self = https://watcher.sour.is/conv/bh5hvtq
@asquare Yeah we know 🤣 Still debating changes to the extension 😅
@asquare Yeah we know 🤣 Still debating changes to the extension 😅
@asquare We've collectively as a community (_welcome to the community too! 🥳_) had a many-week, multi-thread debate over this. It all boils down to Content Addressing vs. Location Addressing and the benefits, pros/cons of each approach. Ultimately though threads in Twtxt take advantage of a convention we formalized as the Twt Subject. This is combined with a Location-based Addressing, the Twt Hash extension. In the end we are likely to stay with this approach, but fix the parameters we use and truction._
@asquare We've collectively as a community (_welcome to the community too! 🥳_) had a many-week, multi-thread debate over this. It all boils down to Content Addressing vs. Location Addressing and the benefits, pros/cons of each approach. Ultimately though threads in Twtxt take advantage of a convention we formalized as the Twt Subject. This is combined with a Location-based Addressing, the Twt Hash extension. In the end we are likely to stay with this approach, but fix the parameters we use and truction._
@asquare Iant yhay what I said? Or did I fat-finger my reply 🤣
@asquare Iant yhay what I said? Or did I fat-finger my reply 🤣
In any case, yes Content addressing can break threads when the original content is edited that's for sure, however we've since agreed and realized that technically speaking, we can actually identify from a clients perspective, whether an edit took place.
In any case, yes Content addressing can break threads when the original content is edited that's for sure, however we've since agreed and realized that technically speaking, we can actually identify from a clients perspective, whether an edit took place.
@asquare No need to apologise 😅 All very good points 👌
@asquare No need to apologise 😅 All very good points 👌