# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
# 
# Usage:
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users              View list of users and latest twt date.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt                View all twts.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri  View all mentions for uri.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash         View all twts for a conversation subject.
# 
# Options:
#     uri     Filter to show a specific users twts.
#     offset  Start index for quey.
#     limit   Count of items to return (going back in time).
# 
# twt range = 1 19
# self = https://watcher.sour.is/conv/c43rorq
@carsten Your thoughts/opinions on Activity Pub integration with Yarn / Tstxt? πŸ€”

What about you @eldersnake ?
@carsten Your thoughts/opinions on Activity Pub integration with Yarn / Tstxt? πŸ€”

What about you @eldersnake ?
@carsten Your thoughts/opinions on Activity Pub integration with Yarn / Tstxt? πŸ€”

What about you @eldersnake ?
@carsten Your thoughts/opinions on Activity Pub integration with Yarn / Tstxt? πŸ€”

What about you @eldersnake ?
@prologic good morning. I am uncertain if this would be beneficial or not. On one hand, it would be nice to see twtx show up in my mastodon feed. Sure, on the other hand, I think it would be too much to get them here in yarn social. I like the small audience and group of people around this. It is a limited factor and a limited small nerdy group, but isn't this why you have developed it? And people are using it? Small groups of people? Of course, you could achieve the same on any mastodon instance, but the deployment stack of mastodon is huge compared to twtx.

I would not want it. Maybe crossposting from twtxt to an activity pup instance is sth I would use.

One other question that I am asking myself, and I think I mentioned that in our email conversations, is the fact if we really need so many interconnected systems and do I or do we want to use so many different systems?
@prologic Each system was created because there was someone thinking about something that this person was missing from the other systems. Now that we start connecting all these systems back together, do we then need the different systems anymore, or could we only fall back to using one system?
@prologic Each system was created because there was someone thinking about something that this person was missing from the other systems. Now that we start connecting all these systems back together, do we then need the different systems anymore or could we only fall back to using only one system?
@carsten Yes, an option for deliberate cross-posting or POSSE the IndieWeb way is more appealing to me also, to keep yarn.social feeling light and clean. In that way your twtxt feed would be the backbone of your own site and the have some middle-ware, which cross-post to your mastodon account and whatever service you fancy to use:
@carsten Yes, an option for deliberate cross-posting or POSSE the IndieWeb way is more appealing to me also to keep yarn.social feeling light and clean. In that way your twtxt feed would be the backbone of your own site and then have some middle-ware, which cross-post to your mastodon account and whatever service you fancy to use:
@carsten Yes, an option for deliberate cross-posting or POSSE the IndieWeb way is more appealing to me also, to keep yarn.social feeling light and clean. In that way your twtxt feed would be the backbone of your own site and the have some middle-ware, which cross-post to your mastodon account and whatever service you fancy to use:
@carsten This is a good point πŸ‘Œ

> I like the small audience and group of people around this. It is a limited factor and a limited small nerdy group, but isn’t this why you have developed it? And people are using it? Small groups of people?
@carsten This is a good point πŸ‘Œ

> I like the small audience and group of people around this. It is a limited factor and a limited small nerdy group, but isn’t this why you have developed it? And people are using it? Small groups of people?
@carsten This is a good point πŸ‘Œ

> I like the small audience and group of people around this. It is a limited factor and a limited small nerdy group, but isn’t this why you have developed it? And people are using it? Small groups of people?
@carsten This is a good point πŸ‘Œ

> I like the small audience and group of people around this. It is a limited factor and a limited small nerdy group, but isn’t this why you have developed it? And people are using it? Small groups of people?
@prologic I think I'm somewhere in the same camp as @mckinley etc on this one. There's still a real purity to what we have here with Yarn/twtxt, so while I'm sure integration of some sort is useful for people, I guess it should be as least impactful on the current system as possible. An adapter or service does sound better rather than yarnd talking directly to it all, if I understand that part of the conversation correctly. I know very little of ActivityPub admittedly though.
@eldersnake Thanks πŸ™ I'll put you down as "indifferent somewhat" πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
@eldersnake Thanks πŸ™ I'll put you down as "indifferent somewhat" πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
@eldersnake Thanks πŸ™ I'll put you down as "indifferent somewhat" πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
@eldersnake Thanks πŸ™ I'll put you down as "indifferent somewhat" πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ