# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
#
# Usage:
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users View list of users and latest twt date.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt View all twts.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri View all mentions for uri.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash View all twts for a conversation subject.
#
# Options:
# uri Filter to show a specific users twts.
# offset Start index for quey.
# limit Count of items to return (going back in time).
#
# twt range = 1 34
# self = https://watcher.sour.is/conv/cepoeiq
@prologic easier approach is just don't use MS Teams, lol.
@prologic I too often have to use it at work.
I'm on Linux so the xdg-open keep asking me to run the non existent app everytime, I think you can tweak the browser to change the behavior for any custom protocols somewhere, I've seen it in Firefox but not in Chrome.
I need it myself since I use everyday both Teams and Zoom, bothering me on every joining.
@justamoment Yeah it's really fucking annoying 😡 Figuring out how to convince Chrome to stop offering or actually opening the Teams or Slack desktop apps though is equally painful 🤦♂️
@justamoment Yeah it's really fucking annoying 😡 Figuring out how to convince Chrome to stop offering or actually opening the Teams or Slack desktop apps though is equally painful 🤦♂️
@justamoment Yeah it's really fucking annoying 😡 Figuring out how to convince Chrome to stop offering or actually opening the Teams or Slack desktop apps though is equally painful 🤦♂️
@justamoment Yeah it's really fucking annoying 😡 Figuring out how to convince Chrome to stop offering or actually opening the Teams or Slack desktop apps though is equally painful 🤦♂️
@prologic Maybe try the new duckduckgo browser?
@tel why not? What is wrong about that browser?
@carsten I tried duckduckgo on Android and was pleasantly surprised but it's still somewhat immature as a daily driven browser for me, especially the tabs navigation, I even filed a feedback report about it from the settings in hope it gets better.
Sadly there no Linux version right now, once it's out I'll definitely try it out.
@carsten
> why not? What is wrong about that browser?
It's proprietary and DuckDuckGo has had a sketchy past.
@mckinley I did not know DDG was all proprietary 🤦♂️
@mckinley I did not know DDG was all proprietary 🤦♂️
@mckinley I did not know DDG was all proprietary 🤦♂️
@mckinley I did not know DDG was all proprietary 🤦♂️
@prologic The mobile browsers are both free software, but the Mac OS browser is currently proprietary.
> We plan to open source our Mac app after the beta period, like we’ve done for our iOS & Android app, and many of our built-in privacy protections are already open sourced.
https://spreadprivacy.com/introducing-duckduckgo-for-mac/
@mckinley Ahh I see. Well at _least_ they do intend to open source it? 👌
@mckinley Ahh I see. Well at _least_ they do intend to open source it? 👌
@mckinley Ahh I see. Well at _least_ they do intend to open source it? 👌
@mckinley Ahh I see. Well at _least_ they do intend to open source it? 👌
@prologic Yes, they said they intend to do so, but it doesn't matter what they say.
Proprietary software claiming to “protect your privacy” cannot and should not be trusted.
@mckinley
> Proprietary software claiming to “protect your privacy” cannot and should not be trusted.
I agree with this 💯 -- There is no better scrutiny of software than one that's built in the open for all to see and exploit its weaknesses 👌
@mckinley
> Proprietary software claiming to “protect your privacy” cannot and should not be trusted.
I agree with this 💯 -- There is no better scrutiny of software than one that's built in the open for all to see and exploit its weaknesses 👌
@mckinley
> Proprietary software claiming to “protect your privacy” cannot and should not be trusted.
I agree with this 💯 -- There is no better scrutiny of software than one that's built in the open for all to see and exploit its weaknesses 👌
@mckinley
> Proprietary software claiming to “protect your privacy” cannot and should not be trusted.
I agree with this 💯 -- There is no better scrutiny of software than one that's built in the open for all to see and exploit its weaknesses 👌
@mckinley mmh ok. Do they? I don't know. I didn't know. I like them.