# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
#
# Usage:
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users View list of users and latest twt date.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt View all twts.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri View all mentions for uri.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash View all twts for a conversation subject.
#
# Options:
# uri Filter to show a specific users twts.
# offset Start index for quey.
# limit Count of items to return (going back in time).
#
# twt range = 1 23
# self = https://watcher.sour.is/conv/co5hwpq
With the new Timeline-style view of "Bookmarks", managed to trim my bookmarks down to a nice ~10 that I _think_ are worth remembering over the past year of Yarn.social 👌~
With the new Timeline-style view of "Bookmarks", managed to trim my bookmarks down to a nice ~10 that I _think_ are worth remembering over the past year of Yarn.social 👌~
I _think_ I know enough now to turn this sort of thing into something generally more useful. Lists.
I _think_ I know enough now to turn this sort of thing into something generally more useful. Lists.
@prologic lists of bookmarks? or lists of posts filtered by #tags?
@darch Maybe also lists listing the lists of bookmarks. 🤔😂
Also we need to headlines indicating what view you are one. Right now i belive we only got it for conversations/yarns. That would be:
- Discovery (POD or GLOBAL timeline)
- USER Timeline
- USER Metions
- Bookmarks for USER
- Conversation/Yarn
- other lists?
Also we need to headlines indicating what view you are one. Right now i belive we only got it for conversations/yarns. That would be:\n- Discovery (POD or GLOBAL timeline)\n- USER Timeline\n- USER Metions\n- Bookmarks for USER\n- Conversation/Yarn\n- other lists?
@darch Basically two kinds of lists:\n\n- collections of Twts e.g bookmarks\n- collection of feeds
@darch Basically two kinds of lists:
- collections of Twts e.g bookmarks
- collection of feeds
@darch Basically two kinds of lists:
- collections of Twts e.g bookmarks
- collection of feeds
@adi This list of list listing list isn't inclusive enough, it has a section for fictional deities, but inugamies (the species of my dog mascot) are excluded, despite having a Wikipedia page, even though that page only talks about the Yokai "version" of an inugami, which probably sharea no similarities with the "modern" inugamies, such as myself. 😏\nYeah, this is the reason why I usually refer to myself as a dog or a canine, to prevent myself from writing inugami related text walls in every post. 😂
@adi This list of list listing list isn't inclusive enough, it has a section for fictional deities, but inugamies (the species of my dog mascot) are excluded, despite having a Wikipedia page, even though that page only talks about the Yokai "version" of an inugami, which probably sharea no similarities with the "modern" inugamies, such as myself. 😏
Yeah, this is the reason why I usually refer to myself as a dog or a canine, to prevent myself from writing inugami related text walls in every post. 😂
@adi I think it's better I don't, for the sake of everyonesn sanity. The Yokai inugamies who have a page might be a part of mythology, but not really fiction deities (maybe demons).\nThe only "modern" inugami even mentioned on Wikipedia is Sadaharu, the white inugami from the anime Gintama and even he is only mentioned in a list (called "List of Gin Tama characters").\nIn his description it links to the Yokai inugami page, which is probably because that's the only one that can be written using any "real sources", as the other kinds like the one Gintama used or the one I'm using were changed to fit best with the lore they needed to fit into and honestly even between these two there are some pretty key differences, so Wikipedia is probably better of with just one entry about the Yokai kind (as described in Japanese mythology), rather than also having a long list of every other interpretations that came afterwards and were only used for one or two characters. 😄
@adi I think it's better I don't, for the sake of everyonesn sanity. The Yokai inugamies who have a page might be a part of mythology, but not really fiction deities (maybe demons).
The only "modern" inugami even mentioned on Wikipedia is Sadaharu, the white inugami from the anime Gintama and even he is only mentioned in a list (called "List of Gin Tama characters").
In his description it links to the Yokai inugami page, which is probably because that's the only one that can be written using any "real sources", as the other kinds like the one Gintama used or the one I'm using were changed to fit best with the lore they needed to fit into and honestly even between these two there are some pretty key differences, so Wikipedia is probably better of with just one entry about the Yokai kind (as described in Japanese mythology), rather than also having a long list of every other interpretations that came afterwards and were only used for one or two characters. 😄