# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
# 
# Usage:
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users              View list of users and latest twt date.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt                View all twts.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri  View all mentions for uri.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash         View all twts for a conversation subject.
# 
# Options:
#     uri     Filter to show a specific users twts.
#     offset  Start index for quey.
#     limit   Count of items to return (going back in time).
# 
# twt range = 1 8
# self = https://watcher.sour.is/conv/ct2ezwq
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@abucci I think it’s fine to require users to install these DNS entries. The domain isn’t under Google’s control, so there’s nothing they can do. You can always transfer your domain to Google (please don’t 😅).

Buuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuut why wasn’t Google support able to tell you this? SPF/DKIM is a basic part of today’s email. It’s one of the first things they should have checked.

Let’s say there’s room for improvement when it comes to Google support. 🙄
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@abucci I think it’s fine to require users to install these DNS entries. The domain isn’t under Google’s control, so there’s nothing they can do. You can always transfer your domain to Google (please don’t 😅).

Buuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuut why wasn’t Google support able to tell you this? SPF/DKIM is a basic part of today’s email. It’s one of the first things they should have checked.

Let’s say there’s room for improvement when it comes to Google support. 🙄
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@abucci I think it’s fine to require users to install these DNS entries. The domain isn’t under Google’s control, so there’s nothing they can do. You can always transfer your domain to Google (please don’t 😅).

Buuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuut why wasn’t Google support able to tell you this? SPF/DKIM is a basic part of today’s email. It’s one of the first things they should have checked.

Let’s say there’s room for improvement when it comes to Google support. 🙄
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@movq Google™ support is fucking atrocious 🤣
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@movq Google™ support is fucking atrocious 🤣
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@movq Google™ support is fucking atrocious 🤣
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@movq Google™ support is fucking atrocious 🤣
thecanine
twtxt.net
View Thread
@prologic Google support? There exists an alternative to finding the e-mail address of the most important Google employee you can find and spamming them until moral improves?

Well if the new option is awful, you can always return to the original one I just described - no need to thank me.

Might as well also tell them, to shove their whole browser authentication/OAUTH2/secure browser detection team far up someones ass. They've just had it set to check user agents for years, while pretending they're actively working on actually making that thing be of any use.