# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
#
# Usage:
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users View list of users and latest twt date.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt View all twts.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri View all mentions for uri.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash View all twts for a conversation subject.
#
# Options:
# uri Filter to show a specific users twts.
# offset Start index for quey.
# limit Count of items to return (going back in time).
#
# twt range = 1 10
# self = https://watcher.sour.is/conv/e2ui76a
@fastidious Hahaha ๐ It's of course a trade-off ๐
For users like you we _may_have to consider building another Cache implementation ๐_
@fastidious Hahaha ๐ It's of course a trade-off ๐
For users like you we _may_have to consider building another Cache implementation ๐_
And by โIโ @homer meant me, of course. ๐
One thing I do want to point out and for us to remember, is that many parts of the design and implemtnation of yarnd were on-purpose. The way feeds, views, etc are held in-memory is by design. I never intended for example to use some "big" scalable database, because that leads to "oh let's just spin up a big pod with 10k or 100k users" and defeats the point of centralization ๐
-- "Balancing" act ๐
One thing I do want to point out and for us to remember, is that many parts of the design and implemtnation of yarnd were on-purpose. The way feeds, views, etc are held in-memory is by design. I never intended for example to use some "big" sc
One thing I do want to point out and for us to remember, is that many parts of the design and implemtnation of yarnd were on-purpose. The way feeds, views, etc are held in-memory is by design. I never intended for example to use some "big" scalable database, because that leads to "oh let's just spin up a big pod with 10k or 100k users" and defeats the point of centralization ๐
-- "Balancing" act ๐
@prologic โโฆ and defeats the point of centralizationโฆโ decentralisation, yup. No, I get it. Maybe we should then put hard, and lower, limits on -I and -C (or is it lower case c, donโt remember now)?