# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
# 
# Usage:
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users              View list of users and latest twt date.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt                View all twts.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri  View all mentions for uri.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash         View all twts for a conversation subject.
# 
# Options:
#     uri     Filter to show a specific users twts.
#     offset  Start index for quey.
#     limit   Count of items to return (going back in time).
# 
# twt range = 1 34
# self = https://watcher.sour.is/conv/e6ah5mq
lyse
lyse.isobeef.org
View Thread
Hey @laz, here I'm testing my hypothesis I had on IRC that mentions in yarnd operate on just the nick, but not the URL.
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@laz @lyse Pretty sure they match on URI 😁
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@laz @lyse Pretty sure they match on URI 😁
laz
tt.vltra.plus
View Thread
@prologic @lyse Your (lyse) message shows up in Timeline (as I'm following you) but not in Mentions. prologic and eldersnake @'s do show in Mentions.
lyse
lyse.isobeef.org
View Thread
@laz Hmmm. How about a real mention with both nick and URL matching?
lyse
lyse.isobeef.org
View Thread
@prologic @laz And now with HTTPS rather than HTTP.
laz
tt.vltra.plus
View Thread
@lyse Nope again. Not showing in Mentions. Do my twts show in your Mentions?
laz
tt.vltra.plus
View Thread
@lyse @prologic Oh yes! This one is showing :)
lyse
lyse.isobeef.org
View Thread
@prologic @laz Alright, great. The protocol was the issue then. So my theory was wrong, very nice. :-)
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
Awwesome πŸ‘ŒπŸ˜
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
Awwesome πŸ‘ŒπŸ˜
laz
tt.vltra.plus
View Thread
@lyse @prologic I think a possibility is that when I had thought my problem was solved (pod name), some 'followed' me while the BASE_URL was still http and now that it's https I am still being followed by a user but I am not being recognised for Mentions. Which lyse has now resolved on his end
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@lyse @laz Yup πŸ‘Œ
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@lyse @laz Yup πŸ‘Œ
jlj
twt.nfld.uk
View Thread
So I don't seem to have anything in Mentions. Is there something I need to be doing?
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@jlj Don’t think so but I almost never use it myself πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@jlj Don’t think so but I almost never use it myself πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ
laz
tt.vltra.plus
View Thread
@jlj Does this twt show up in your Mentions? I understand anything you are tagged/mentioned in should show there.\n\nAlso check your list of 'Following' and see if my user is pointing to http or https.\nIt should be https://tt.vltra.plus/user/laz/twtxt.txt
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
Yeah @laz is right, I _wonder_ whether some of the "Following" data has gotten messed up. But I also _think_ @lyse is perhaps right in that we should consider "refreshing" the data every now and again. The trouble is I'm just not sure how often we should nuke the "Following" list per user on a pod? πŸ€” -- Actually as i type this I realize this doesn't make a lot of sense πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ The "Mentions" simply parses your Timeline for anything that contains your "identity" which for me is anything that has <prologic https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt>
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
Yeah @laz is right, I _wonder_ whether some of the "Following" data has gotten messed up. But I also _think_ @lyse is perhaps right in that we should consider "refreshing" the data every now and again. The trouble is I'm just not sure how often we should nuke the "Following" list per user on a pod? πŸ€” -- Actually as i type this I realize this doesn't make a lot of sense πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ The "Mentions" simply parses your Timeline for anything that contains your "identity" which for me is anything that has <prologic https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt>
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@lyse @laz @prologic Hmmmm so I just inspected the code-path for this. internal/handlers.go in the MentionsHandler() which then calls out to the cache.GetMentions() in internal/cache.go. The code looks pretty robust AFAICT but I'd be very curious to see if you guys discover a bug! πŸ€”
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@lyse @laz @prologic Hmmmm so I just inspected the code-path for this. internal/handlers.go in the MentionsHandler() which then calls out to the cache.GetMentions() in internal/cache.go. The code looks pretty robust AFAICT but I'd be very curious to see if you guys discover a bug! πŸ€”
jlj
twt.nfld.uk
View Thread
@laz Nah, no dice. But, yeah, I confirmed that I'm following both of your accounts properly.
jlj
twt.nfld.uk
View Thread
@prologic @laz @lyse Interesting. So, I wonder what my raw timeline looks like then, that that logic isn't matching mentions correctly in my case. πŸ€”
laz
tt.vltra.plus
View Thread
@jlj Ah, that's a shame. Your reply shows up in my Mentions though :)\n\n@https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt> I'm probably not up to the task of looking at your code, but if it's up to each user having the correct identity recorded in a cache, then it would be nice to have a way to check for any broken links and refresh this.
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@laz @lyse @jlj Wonder no more! πŸ€—


* 78751d2 2021-09-27 | Add --json flag to yarnc timeline command for seeing and processing the raw JSON from the API (HEAD -> master, origin/master) [James Mills]
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@laz @lyse @jlj Wonder no more! πŸ€—


* 78751d2 2021-09-27 | Add --json flag to yarnc timeline command for seeing and processing the raw JSON from the API (HEAD -> master, origin/master) [James Mills]
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@laz @lyse @jlj Wonder no more! πŸ€—\n\n
\n* 78751d2 2021-09-27 | Add --json flag to yarnc timeline command for seeing and processing the raw JSON from the API (HEAD -> master, origin/master) [James Mills]\n
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@jlj @laz I agree but first have to understand the problem ☺️ I’m not even sure what’s going on yet πŸ˜₯
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@jlj @laz I agree but first have to understand the problem ☺️ I’m not even sure what’s going on yet πŸ˜₯
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@jlj @laz Mentions are also working for me hmm πŸ€”
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@jlj @laz Mentions are also working for me hmm πŸ€”
jlj
twt.nfld.uk
View Thread
@prologic @laz @lyse Ah, nice. OK, I'll grab that update tonight. I don't really use it, but I know @search_social does, or would do, assuming it works for other pod members. So I want to make sure it does! :-)
lyse
lyse.isobeef.org
View Thread
@prologic @laz @jlj Okay, I had a look at the mentioned source code and it looks absolutely fine to me.