# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
#
# Usage:
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users View list of users and latest twt date.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt View all twts.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri View all mentions for uri.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash View all twts for a conversation subject.
#
# Options:
# uri Filter to show a specific users twts.
# offset Start index for quey.
# limit Count of items to return (going back in time).
#
# twt range = 1 20
# self = https://watcher.sour.is/conv/ewlkkra
@eldersnake This is a really great video of vide of the kinds of problems and mechanisms I _believe_ are utterly broken in traditional social media! 👌 This is why we (_I guess we'll soon be called Yarn.social_) will never build things like, well, "Likes", "Re-whatever" or modify anything about your timeline besides chronological ordering. What you see here is as good (_or as bad, ir may never become huge or popular, let's face it!, it lacks the dopamine effects_) as it gets 😀
@eldersnake This is a really great video of vide of the kinds of problems and mechanisms I _believe_ are utterly broken in traditional social media! 👌 This is why we (_I guess we'll soon be called Yarn.social_) will never build things like, well, "Likes", "Re-whatever" or modify anything about your timeline besides chronological ordering. What you see here is as good (_or as bad, ir may never become huge or popular, let's face it!, it lacks the dopamine effects_) as it gets 😀
@eldersnake This is a really great video of vide of the kinds of problems and mechanisms I _believe_ are utterly broken in traditional social media! 👌 This is why we (_I guess we'll soon be called Yarn.social_) will never build things like, well, "Likes", "Re-whatever" or modify anything about your timeline besides chronological ordering. What you see here is as good (_or as bad, ir may never become huge or popular, let's face it!, it lacks the dopamine effects_) as it gets 😀
it's too bad the platform/software the author chose to host his video(s) on also suffers from the same feature sets, so so-called "tokens" 🤣
it's too bad the platform/software the author chose to host his video(s) on also suffers from the same feature sets, so so-called "tokens" 🤣
it's too bad the platform/software the author chose to host his video(s) on also suffers from the same feature sets, so so-called "tokens" 🤣
Anyway... This video is really quite good, in fact I'll keep and preserve a copy of it. 👌
Anyway... This video is really quite good, in fact I'll keep and preserve a copy of it. 👌
Anyway... This video is really quite good, in fact I'll keep and preserve a copy of it. 👌
@prologic "What you see here is as good (or as bad, ir may never become huge or popular, let’s face it!, it lacks the dopamine effects) as it gets" \nAnd fine with me! (how do you quote on here?). Something I've begun to realise while being on here is that the only 'reaction' one gets is actual *interaction*, you know, with words and stuff like people would normally do in conversations, and it's kinda refreshing.
@prologic "What you see here is as good (or as bad, ir may never become huge or popular, let’s face it!, it lacks the dopamine effects) as it gets"
And fine with me! (how do you quote on here?). Something I've begun to realise while being on here is that the only 'reaction' one gets is actual *interaction*, you know, with words and stuff like people would normally do in conversations, and it's kinda refreshing.
@prologic "What you see here is as good (or as bad, ir may never become huge or popular, let’s face it!, it lacks the dopamine effects) as it gets" \nAnd fine with me! (how do you quote on here?). Something I've begun to realise while being on here is that the only 'reaction' one gets is actual *interaction*, you know, with words and stuff like people would normally do in conversations, and it's kinda refreshing.
@eldersnake \n\n> And fine with me! (how do you quote on here?). Something I’ve begun to realise while being on here is that the only ‘reaction’ one gets is actual interaction, you know, with words and stuff like people would normally do in conversations, and it’s kinda refreshing.\n\nThat _was_ and is quite deliberate in fact. I _should_ talk more about the design or document it a bit more, but I wanted the experience to be as close to a "real" conversation with people as possible.
@eldersnake \n\n> And fine with me! (how do you quote on here?). Something I’ve begun to realise while being on here is that the only ‘reaction’ one gets is actual interaction, you know, with words and stuff like people would normally do in conversations, and it’s kinda refreshing.\n\nThat _was_ and is quite deliberate in fact. I _should_ talk more about the design or document it a bit more, but I wanted the experience to be as close to a "real" conversation with people as possible.
@eldersnake
> And fine with me! (how do you quote on here?). Something I’ve begun to realise while being on here is that the only ‘reaction’ one gets is actual interaction, you know, with words and stuff like people would normally do in conversations, and it’s kinda refreshing.
That _was_ and is quite deliberate in fact. I _should_ talk more about the design or document it a bit more, but I wanted the experience to be as close to a "real" conversation with people as possible.
@eldersnake
> And fine with me! (how do you quote on here?). Something I’ve begun to realise while being on here is that the only ‘reaction’ one gets is actual interaction, you know, with words and stuff like people would normally do in conversations, and it’s kinda refreshing.
That _was_ and is quite deliberate in fact. I _should_ talk more about the design or document it a bit more, but I wanted the experience to be as close to a "real" conversation with people as possible.