# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
# 
# Usage:
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users              View list of users and latest twt date.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt                View all twts.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri  View all mentions for uri.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash         View all twts for a conversation subject.
# 
# Options:
#     uri     Filter to show a specific users twts.
#     offset  Start index for quey.
#     limit   Count of items to return (going back in time).
# 
# twt range = 1 13
# self = https://watcher.sour.is/conv/fml2g4a
Man, that Port70 feed... šŸ˜‚
@prologic this is going on for multiple pages on your pod, viewing in guest/logged out mode, so someone is following that feed I guess. I guess this leads into the question, do we need a way to automatically limit content that might be considered spam? šŸ¤” As in totally duplicate yarns like that one.
@eldersnake Yeah I emailed the "administrator" / "maintainer" and this is the response I got:



šŸ¤·ā€ā™‚ļø I _honestly_ don't know how to help if the help is just flat out refused šŸ˜¢ šŸ˜”
@eldersnake Yeah I emailed the "administrator" / "maintainer" and this is the response I got:



šŸ¤·ā€ā™‚ļø I _honestly_ don't know how to help if the help is just flat out refused šŸ˜¢ šŸ˜”
@eldersnake Yeah I emailed the "administrator" / "maintainer" and this is the response I got:\n\n \n\nšŸ¤·ā€ā™‚ļø I _honestly_ don't know how to help if the help is just flat out refused šŸ˜¢ šŸ˜”
It's at this point that I _believe_ it might be time to implement and add support for pod-level "blacklist"(s). Basically I'm not even sure how this feed hits my pod's cache, like at all. Noone on my pod seems to follow it? šŸ¤”
It's at this point that I _believe_ it might be time to implement and add support for pod-level "blacklist"(s). Basically I'm not even sure how this feed hits my pod's cache, like at all. Noone on my pod seems to follow it? šŸ¤”
Oh well good news, we're having a dialogue, so we'll see where this goes. The problem as I've stated is I have no idea where or how this is landing n my pod's cache at all šŸ˜¢ It's a right royal #mystery šŸ¤”
Oh well good news, we're having a dialogue, so we'll see where this goes. The problem as I've stated is I have no idea where or how this is landing n my pod's cache at all šŸ˜¢ It's a right royal #mystery šŸ¤”
@eldersnake

> I guess this leads into the question, do we need a way to automatically limit content that might be considered spam? šŸ¤” As in totally duplicate yarns like that one.

Well yes and no, the thing is; The Feed Cachee's MaxCacheTTL and MaxCacheItems already limit this kind of thing to a degree. The so-called "spam" will come and go as quickly as it came just be sheer fact of other activity.
@eldersnake \n\n> I guess this leads into the question, do we need a way to automatically limit content that might be considered spam? šŸ¤” As in totally duplicate yarns like that one.\n\nWell yes and no, the thing is; The Feed Cachee's MaxCacheTTL and MaxCacheItems already limit this kind of thing to a degree. The so-called "spam" will come and go as quickly as it came just be sheer fact of other activity.
@eldersnake

> I guess this leads into the question, do we need a way to automatically limit content that might be considered spam? šŸ¤” As in totally duplicate yarns like that one.

Well yes and no, the thing is; The Feed Cachee's MaxCacheTTL and MaxCacheItems already limit this kind of thing to a degree. The so-called "spam" will come and go as quickly as it came just be sheer fact of other activity.