# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
# 
# Usage:
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users              View list of users and latest twt date.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt                View all twts.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri  View all mentions for uri.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash         View all twts for a conversation subject.
# 
# Options:
#     uri     Filter to show a specific users twts.
#     offset  Start index for quey.
#     limit   Count of items to return (going back in time).
# 
# twt range = 1 16
# self = https://watcher.sour.is/conv/haohlha
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@logout Hey 👋 Check out https://Yarn.social for a better client and experience 🤗
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@logout Hey 👋 Check out https://Yarn.social for a better client and experience 🤗
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@logout Hey 👋 Check out https://Yarn.social for a better client and experience 🤗
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@logout Hey 👋 Check out https://Yarn.social for a better client and experience 🤗
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@logout Yeah, none of the original twtxt clients support the newer stuff that was developed in the context of Yarn.social. That topic in brackets, in particular, is specified in these two documents:

- https://dev.twtxt.net/doc/twthashextension.html
- https://dev.twtxt.net/doc/twtsubjectextension.html

(Which reminds me, @lyse and @prologic, that the latter is a bit outdated. We don’t use the URL part anymore, just the hash.)

On https://yarn.social/, three clients are listed:

- https://github.com/jdtron/twet
- https://git.envs.net/duriny/twtr (no longer maintained, but maybe someone will pick it up again)
- https://uninformativ.de/git/jenny (tutorial: https://www.uninformativ.de/blog/postings/2021-09-19/0/POSTING-en.html)

jenny is my own client, so, to be honest, I never gave the other ones a try. Nevertheless, I presume that they all support the aforementioned extensions.

There certainly is a lack of clients, that’s for sure. We could use more of them. :-)
movq
uninformativ.de
View Thread
@logout Yeah, none of the original twtxt clients support the newer stuff that was developed in the context of Yarn.social. That topic in brackets, in particular, is specified in these two documents:

- https://dev.twtxt.net/doc/twthashextension.html
- https://dev.twtxt.net/doc/twtsubjectextension.html

(Which reminds me, @lyse and @prologic, that the latter is a bit outdated. We don’t use the URL part anymore, just the hash.)

On https://yarn.social/, three clients are listed:

- https://github.com/jdtron/twet
- https://git.envs.net/duriny/twtr (no longer maintained, but maybe someone will pick it up again)
- https://uninformativ.de/git/jenny (tutorial: https://www.uninformativ.de/blog/postings/2021-09-19/0/POSTING-en.html)

jenny is my own client, so, to be honest, I never gave the other ones a try. Nevertheless, I presume that they all support the aforementioned extensions.

There certainly is a lack of clients, that’s for sure. We could use more of them. :-)
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@logout Yeah, none of the original twtxt clients support the newer stuff that was developed in the context of Yarn.social. That topic in brackets, in particular, is specified in these two documents:

- https://dev.twtxt.net/doc/twthashextension.html
- https://dev.twtxt.net/doc/twtsubjectextension.html

(Which reminds me, @lyse and @prologic, that the latter is a bit outdated. We don’t use the URL part anymore, just the hash.)

On https://yarn.social/, three clients are listed:

- https://github.com/jdtron/twet
- https://git.envs.net/duriny/twtr (no longer maintained, but maybe someone will pick it up again)
- https://uninformativ.de/git/jenny (tutorial: https://www.uninformativ.de/blog/postings/2021-09-19/0/POSTING-en.html)

jenny is my own client, so, to be honest, I never gave the other ones a try. Nevertheless, I presume that they all support the aforementioned extensions.

There certainly is a lack of clients, that’s for sure. We could use more of them. :-)
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@logout Yeah, none of the original twtxt clients support the newer stuff that was developed in the context of Yarn.social. That topic in brackets, in particular, is specified in these two documents:

- https://dev.twtxt.net/doc/twthashextension.html
- https://dev.twtxt.net/doc/twtsubjectextension.html

(Which reminds me, @lyse and @prologic, that the latter is a bit outdated. We don’t use the URL part anymore, just the hash.)

On https://yarn.social/, three clients are listed:

- https://github.com/jdtron/twet
- https://git.envs.net/duriny/twtr (no longer maintained, but maybe someone will pick it up again)
- https://uninformativ.de/git/jenny (tutorial: https://www.uninformativ.de/blog/postings/2021-09-19/0/POSTING-en.html)

jenny is my own client, so, to be honest, I never gave the other ones a try. Nevertheless, I presume that they all support the aforementioned extensions.

There certainly is a lack of clients, that’s for sure. We could use more of them. :-)
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@logout (I'm not even sure if you can properly read my *multiline* reply with the old original client. Hmm.)
movq
uninformativ.de
View Thread
@logout (I'm not even sure if you can properly read my *multiline* reply with the old original client. Hmm.)
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@logout (I'm not even sure if you can properly read my *multiline* reply with the old original client. Hmm.)
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
@logout (I'm not even sure if you can properly read my *multiline* reply with the old original client. Hmm.)
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@movq Yeah let's update this:

> (Which reminds me, @lyse and @prologic, that the latter is a bit outdated. We don’t use the URL part anymore, just the hash.)

PR? 🙏
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@movq Yeah let's update this:

> (Which reminds me, @lyse and @prologic, that the latter is a bit outdated. We don’t use the URL part anymore, just the hash.)

PR? 🙏
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@movq Yeah let's update this:

> (Which reminds me, @lyse and @prologic, that the latter is a bit outdated. We don’t use the URL part anymore, just the hash.)

PR? 🙏
prologic
twtxt.net
View Thread
@movq Yeah let's update this:

> (Which reminds me, @lyse and @prologic, that the latter is a bit outdated. We don’t use the URL part anymore, just the hash.)

PR? 🙏