# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
# 
# Usage:
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users              View list of users and latest twt date.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt                View all twts.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri  View all mentions for uri.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash         View all twts for a conversation subject.
# 
# Options:
#     uri     Filter to show a specific users twts.
#     offset  Start index for quey.
#     limit   Count of items to return (going back in time).
# 
# twt range = 1 25
# self = https://watcher.sour.is/conv/j5bhkfa
More specifically: Will this be expanded into something like Gitea with the concept of users and organizations, or will it stay with a simple flat repository model like upstream legit or cgit?

Also, the shorthand mention syntax has struck again. Apologies, @justamoment.
@mckinley Hmmm 🤔 @xuu Does the lextwt parser not recognize an -mention with a comma terminating it? 🤔
@mckinley Hmmm 🤔 @xuu Does the lextwt parser not recognize an -mention with a comma terminating it? 🤔
@mckinley Hmmm 🤔 @xuu Does the lextwt parser not recognize an -mention with a comma terminating it? 🤔
@mckinley Hmmm 🤔 @xuu Does the lextwt parser not recognize an -mention with a comma terminating it? 🤔
@prologic I think this is the second time I've run into this quirk, but here's the official test:

@prologic,

@prologic,
Yep. I'll open an issue.
Test


@prologic, @prologic@twtxt.net, @prologic. @prologic@twtxt.net. @<prologic https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt>, @<prologic https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt>.


@prologic, @prologic, @prologic. @prologic. @prologic, @prologic.
Interesting... I'll open an issue.
@mckinley Thanks! 🙏
@mckinley Thanks! 🙏
@mckinley Thanks! 🙏
@mckinley Thanks! 🙏
@prologic #1106
@prologic #1106. This is probably the most strange bug I've found.
@mckinley Thanks! 🙏
@mckinley Thanks! 🙏
@mckinley Thanks! 🙏
@mckinley Thanks! 🙏
Huh. I thought I had that one. Must be an unteste regression. Will add it to the list!
Huh. I thought I had that one. Must be an unteste regression. Will add it to the list!
@xuu 👌
@xuu 👌
@xuu 👌
@xuu 👌