# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
#
# Usage:
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users View list of users and latest twt date.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt View all twts.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri View all mentions for uri.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash View all twts for a conversation subject.
#
# Options:
# uri Filter to show a specific users twts.
# offset Start index for quey.
# limit Count of items to return (going back in time).
#
# twt range = 1 8
# self = https://watcher.sour.is/conv/jdl5x5a
@darch There are a few minor regressions. But maybe they were intentional? The "In-Reply-To" used to limit the text to some width and use an ellipsis via CSS to cut it off a bit.
@darch There are a few minor regressions. But maybe they were intentional? The "In-Reply-To" used to limit the text to some width and use an ellipsis via CSS to cut it off a bit.
@prologic Yes that is an new "feature" (not a bug™️) - I have made it to be limited to 3 lines after I made the PR.
Anything else you have found to be off/odd?
@darch If that's intention, that's fine 👌 However it is visually different to tell apart the 'In Reply To ..." with for example an actual quote:
> This is a quote...
Can we do something here?
@darch If that's intention, that's fine 👌 However it is visually different to tell apart the 'In Reply To ..." with for example an actual quote:
> This is a quote...
Can we do something here?
@prologic Allready did that, because I found it confusing too: 
@darch Cool that's much better 👌
@darch Cool that's much better 👌