> The lightweight Kubernetes
My arse π€£ -- And now I have to spend my day figuring out why the hell I seem to have a missing binary:
fork/exec /usr/libexec/kubernetes/kubelet-plugins/volume/exec/nodeagent~uds/uds: no such file or directory, output
But if you Google that you'll end up https://github.com/projectcalico/calico/issues/5356 which seems a bit unrelated since I don't even have that binary on disk at that path π€¦ββοΈ So much for Ubuntu Snap(s) π€¦ββοΈ
> The lightweight Kubernetes
My arse π€£ -- And now I have to spend my day figuring out why the hell I seem to have a missing binary:
fork/exec /usr/libexec/kubernetes/kubelet-plugins/volume/exec/nodeagent~uds/uds: no such file or directory, output
But if you Google that you'll end up https://github.com/projectcalico/calico/issues/5356 which seems a bit unrelated since I don't even have that binary on disk at that path π€¦ββοΈ So much for Ubuntu Snap(s) π€¦ββοΈ
It's still all too complicated in general though π€£
It's still all too complicated in general though π€£
it's simple in principle and architecture. but the infinite abstractions and constant tool-shifting makes it a schizophrenic erector set for angry adults.
next time we session let me show you a couple of ideas on how to make it simple and keep it that way.
and yes, i still rock swarm as the main dc.
One day I really would like to evolve box a bit more π I mean when it comes down to it (for me) this whole "Container" hype really comes down to two things for me:
- Packaging convenience
- Some kind of resource isolution, security, etc
The later of which is kind of subjective I guess π
One day I really would like to evolve box a bit more π I mean when it comes down to it (for me) this whole "Container" hype really comes down to two things for me:
- Packaging convenience
- Some kind of resource isolution, security, etc
The later of which is kind of subjective I guess π
i took a look at box and think it's a good path forward. it's like a docker-lite from what i gather. this is an area of research for me, so if you'd like to collaborate, i'm interested.
box to a point where you could run "production workloads" on it. Yes it is "Docker-like (or inspired I guess) -- But actually it's more derived from my own research into how Containers works at a low-level and my original implementation in POSIX Sh -- also called box.sh that used unshare and chroot.
box to a point where you could run "production workloads" on it. Yes it is "Docker-like (or inspired I guess) -- But actually it's more derived from my own research into how Containers works at a low-level and my original implementation in POSIX Sh -- also called box.sh that used unshare and chroot.