# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
#
# Usage:
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users View list of users and latest twt date.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt View all twts.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri View all mentions for uri.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash View all twts for a conversation subject.
#
# Options:
# uri Filter to show a specific users twts.
# offset Start index for quey.
# limit Count of items to return (going back in time).
#
# twt range = 1 1
# self = https://watcher.sour.is/conv/klbfnia
{@https://twtxt.net/user/lukem/twtxt.txt>#5lnydqq} @prologic @slashdot (#lr7dida) if it was indeed 'criminal defamation' as the article suggests (I have no further evidence to question or back up that claim), then I see nothing crazy about that. I've seen enough people doing malicious things online to give business owners the benefit of the doubt.