# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
#
# Usage:
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users View list of users and latest twt date.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt View all twts.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri View all mentions for uri.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash View all twts for a conversation subject.
#
# Options:
# uri Filter to show a specific users twts.
# offset Start index for quey.
# limit Count of items to return (going back in time).
#
# twt range = 1 11
# self = https://watcher.sour.is/conv/kojyd3a
@abucci To be fair, I _think_ it's sadly easy to fall into these "traps" (is this what we call bubbles? π€) -- So in good faith in return let's go easy on poor @brasshopper π€ -- In the world we live in today, it is _so easy_ to fall into these bubbles it's not even funny anymore π€¦ββοΈ -- Truths are so hard to find today with all the media that combarded at us and all the propaganda on all sides π -- The only thing I know to be sure of is in today's day and age (Information age?) -- Data and Information are now considered "modern weapons".
@abucci To be fair, I _think_ it's sadly easy to fall into these "traps" (is this what we call bubbles? π€) -- So in good faith in return let's go easy on poor @brasshopper π€ -- In the world we live in today, it is _so easy_ to fall into these bubbles it's not even funny anymore π€¦ββοΈ -- Truths are so hard to find today with all the media that combarded at us and all the propaganda on all sides π -- The only thing I know to be sure of is in today's day and age (Information age?) -- Data and Information are now considered "modern weapons".
@prologic I have muted abucci. He's clearly not wanting to interact in a fair or open manner. Clearly, any further conversation with him is a waste of my time. I appreciate your attempts to act in good faith in this conversation. However, you haven't brought any material facts to light that I wasn't already aware of. You haven't directly addressed any of my core arguments. Your previous reply is super condescending ("poor brasshopper@twtxt.net"). And frankly, I find it hilarious that you're the one thinking that I've drank the propaganda kool-aid. You, sir, are the one trapped in Plato's cave. I believe any further discussion to be a waste of both of our time. Don't bother replying.
@brasshopper Oh dear π
Sorry, I was just trying to keep things civil. π€¦ββοΈ I guess I failed π’
@brasshopper Oh dear π
Sorry, I was just trying to keep things civil. π€¦ββοΈ I guess I failed π’
This is the first actual argument I've seen on the twtverse.
@mckinley Yeah and I feel really bad now π€¦ββοΈ I was _trying_ to keep the peace (as I always do) and probably should have kept my stupid mouth shut π
I was not _trying_ tbe condescending at all π€¦ββοΈ So sorry @brasshopper (_probably muted me too π’_)_
@mckinley Yeah and I feel really bad now π€¦ββοΈ I was _trying_ to keep the peace (as I always do) and probably should have kept my stupid mouth shut π
I was not _trying_ tbe condescending at all π€¦ββοΈ So sorry @brasshopper (_probably muted me too π’_)_
@prologic I appreciate that you were trying to be civil. I do see that, and I thank you for that. And on second read, that last message might be a bit harsher than I intended. Iβm sorry for that. I do think itβs clear to me that weβre not gonna get anywhere having a discussion in this format. I think Iβm realizing this is a terrible medium for this sort of discussion. It creates a false urgency, at least for me. Maybe a long form blog post where commenters can reply in an email 1:1 would be better. I think it might allow everyone more time to allow their ideas to βbakeβ before sending.