# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
#
# Usage:
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users View list of users and latest twt date.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt View all twts.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri View all mentions for uri.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash View all twts for a conversation subject.
#
# Options:
# uri Filter to show a specific users twts.
# offset Start index for quey.
# limit Count of items to return (going back in time).
#
# twt range = 1 9
# self = https://watcher.sour.is/conv/lsipjjq
Slightly on topic, the changes---albeit minimal, as @prologic once told me---that *yarnd* makes on the uploaded images are so visible! On my mobile and desktop, the image is crispy, and more colour rich.
any way we can tweak the image processing to preserve more of the original quality? 🤔
any way we can tweak the image processing to preserve more of the original quality? 🤔
Perhaps a global setting for image compression? That way if your instance has lots of space (and bandwidth I guess) they could choose 100 then default it to like 85 🤷🏼♂️
The only other suggestion would be to convert to png and then do a lossless crush on the image. in most cases they yield a lower filesize than a 100% jpeg.
@prologic I am not sure, or I don’t know. I figure it is the process that shrinks them to 850px that’s affecting their quality.
@ullarah they are already converted to PNG. I think it is the resizing algorithm, but not fully sure.