# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
#
# Usage:
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users View list of users and latest twt date.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt View all twts.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri View all mentions for uri.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash View all twts for a conversation subject.
#
# Options:
# uri Filter to show a specific users twts.
# offset Start index for quey.
# limit Count of items to return (going back in time).
#
# twt range = 1 8
# self = https://watcher.sour.is/conv/mgcvfja
With the new "Hide replies" option has become a lot easier to read through the timeline, but I think the render of OP shoulde be more prominent, more like a headline. So maybe we can try to flip the visual hierarchy so to speak and loose the eclipse feature or expand it to 2 or 3 lines. I will try to make a mock up so you can see what I mean
@darch Hmmm 🤔 I _think_ we discussed this quite a bit when it was first being developed and experimented with a few different ideas... My concern here is "vertical real estate".
Personally I have never found myself noticing one or two words in the In-reply-to context anyway or really recognizing the "shape" of the context -- This is how the brain recognizes things anyway 😅 So I'm not sure what value we would gain by expanding the context really... 🤔
Hopefully others can chime in but that's my $0.02 worth 🤗
@darch Hmmm 🤔 I _think_ we discussed this quite a bit when it was first being developed and experimented with a few different ideas... My concern here is "vertical real estate".
Personally I have never found myself noticing one or two words in the In-reply-to context anyway or really recognizing the "shape" of the context -- This is how the brain recognizes things anyway 😅 So I'm not sure what value we would gain by expanding the context really... 🤔
Hopefully others can chime in but that's my $0.02 worth 🤗
And in case you're wondering ... I did a count ... This Yarn's context is 126 chars long with 24 words 😂 I _think_ this is a case of:
> 640kB ought to be enough for anyone!
🤣
And in case you're wondering ... I did a count ... This Yarn's context is 126 chars long with 24 words 😂 I _think_ this is a case of:
> 640kB ought to be enough for anyone!
🤣
@darch I am not understanding. Could you do that mock up, so I know what you are talking about? When you write "the render of OP", what does it means? If you are talking about providing a multiline context, I will oppose it vehemently thought. It is a context, not a prelude, nor a summary.