# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
# 
# Usage:
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users              View list of users and latest twt date.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt                View all twts.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri  View all mentions for uri.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash         View all twts for a conversation subject.
# 
# Options:
#     uri     Filter to show a specific users twts.
#     offset  Start index for quey.
#     limit   Count of items to return (going back in time).
# 
# twt range = 1 4
# self = https://watcher.sour.is/conv/n5gekkq
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
An article called “I Cheated on My Microsoft Interview (2019)” was posted on lobste.rs: https://lobste.rs/s/jdbrqv/i_cheated_on_my_microsoft_interview_2019

The article itself isn’t that much interesting, I think, but the replies on lobste.rs are. They all agree that “this wasn’t cheating”. “He just got lucky.” “He presented his own solution, not someone else’s.” Baffling, how these people ignore the fact that this guy *pretended* not to know the question and *pretended* to solve it on the spot. *That’s* cheating, is it not? 🤔*
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
An article called “I Cheated on My Microsoft Interview (2019)” was posted on lobste.rs: https://lobste.rs/s/jdbrqv/i_cheated_on_my_microsoft_interview_2019

The article itself isn’t that much interesting, I think, but the replies on lobste.rs are. They all agree that “this wasn’t cheating”. “He just got lucky.” “He presented his own solution, not someone else’s.” Baffling, how these people ignore the fact that this guy *pretended* not to know the question and *pretended* to solve it on the spot. *That’s* cheating, is it not? 🤔*
movq
www.uninformativ.de
View Thread
An article called “I Cheated on My Microsoft Interview (2019)” was posted on lobste.rs: https://lobste.rs/s/jdbrqv/i_cheated_on_my_microsoft_interview_2019

The article itself isn’t that much interesting, I think, but the replies on lobste.rs are. They all agree that “this wasn’t cheating”. “He just got lucky.” “He presented his own solution, not someone else’s.” Baffling, how these people ignore the fact that this guy *pretended* not to know the question and *pretended* to solve it on the spot. *That’s* cheating, is it not? 🤔*
lyse
lyse.isobeef.org
View Thread
@movq The simulation of thinking hard could be considered cheating, yes. But cheating is such a hard term, at least it's not super straight, that's for sure. I can't tell if I would have told the interviewer, that I thought about that question the other day, though.