# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
#
# Usage:
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users View list of users and latest twt date.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt View all twts.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri View all mentions for uri.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash View all twts for a conversation subject.
#
# Options:
# uri Filter to show a specific users twts.
# offset Start index for quey.
# limit Count of items to return (going back in time).
#
# twt range = 1 13
# self = https://watcher.sour.is/conv/nunqpka
@movq, that would be a nice addition. :-) I would also love the ability to hide/not show the hash when reading twtxts (after all, that's on the header on each "email"). Could that be added as a user configurable toggle?
@movq, that would be a nice addition. :-) I would also love the ability to hide/not show the hash when reading twtxts (after all, that's on the header on each "email"). Could that be added as a user configurable toggle?
@quark I once decided against that, didn’t I? 🤔 I don’t remember why anymore. I’ll think about it. 🤔
@quark I once decided against that, didn’t I? 🤔 I don’t remember why anymore. I’ll think about it. 🤔
@quark I once decided against that, didn’t I? 🤔 I don’t remember why anymore. I’ll think about it. 🤔
@quark I once decided against that, didn’t I? 🤔 I don’t remember why anymore. I’ll think about it. 🤔
@movq you said you liked seeing the hash (which is a fair choice!). All I am asking is for a reconsideration as a user configurable feature. ;-) It looks redundant, in my opinion.
@movq you said you liked seeing the hash (which is a fair choice!). All I am asking is for a reconsideration as a user configurable feature. ;-) It looks redundant, in my opinion.
@quark It’s really only about the hash, isn’t it? 🤔 The user mention (@<quark …) should still be visible in full?
@quark It’s really only about the hash, isn’t it? 🤔 The user mention (@<quark …) should still be visible in full?
@quark It’s really only about the hash, isn’t it? 🤔 The user mention (@<quark …) should still be visible in full?
@quark It’s really only about the hash, isn’t it? 🤔 The user mention (@<quark …) should still be visible in full?