# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
#
# Usage:
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users View list of users and latest twt date.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt View all twts.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri View all mentions for uri.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash View all twts for a conversation subject.
#
# Options:
# uri Filter to show a specific users twts.
# offset Start index for quey.
# limit Count of items to return (going back in time).
#
# twt range = 1 33
# self = https://watcher.sour.is/conv/p522joq
@stackeffect On the branch track-lasttwts, I’ve started implementing that “don’t recreate deleted mail files” thingy. So when you delete/move/archive twts, they should no longer reappear when you run jenny -f. Feel free to give this branch a try. 👌 (Bugs may lurk, it’s very fresh.)
@stackeffect On the branch track-lasttwts, I’ve started implementing that “don’t recreate deleted mail files” thingy. So when you delete/move/archive twts, they should no longer reappear when you run jenny -f. Feel free to give this branch a try. 👌 (Bugs may lurk, it’s very fresh.)
@stackeffect On the branch track-lasttwts, I’ve started implementing that “don’t recreate deleted mail files” thingy. So when you delete/move/archive twts, they should no longer reappear when you run jenny -f. Feel free to give this branch a try. 👌 (Bugs may lurk, it’s very fresh.)
@movq
I'll test it tomorrow. Thank's for starting this feature!
@movq \nI'll test it tomorrow. Thank's for starting this feature!
@movq \n> I’ve started implementing that “don’t recreate deleted mail files” thingy\n\nPretty cool! I will check it out tonight. The best CLI twtxt client, bar none! Nothing personal, @lyse. 😊
@fastidious Hahaha, no offence taken. tt really sucks, it's terrible!
Oh come now I think it’s pretty good 😁
Oh come now I think it’s pretty good 😁
@prologic It's really good for me (that's why I'm using it). However, it's a whole different story for all the other folks out there. ;-)
@movq Not that easy to test when pods honor if-modified-since ;-)\nI've almost only timestamps -5364619200.0...\nDiff looks good to me!
@movq Not that easy to test when pods honor if-modified-since ;-)
I've almost only timestamps -5364619200.0...
Diff looks good to me!
@movq Ha, but when you control lastmods, lastseen and lasttwts it's easy to test.\n\nWorks like a charm!
@movq Ha, but when you control lastmods, lastseen and lasttwts it's easy to test.
Works like a charm!
@stackeffect Great. 🙂 Guess I’ll merge that into main soon, then.
@stackeffect Great. 🙂 Guess I’ll merge that into main soon, then.
@stackeffect Great. 🙂 Guess I’ll merge that into main soon, then.
@movq I just observed unexpected old twts coming back.
It looks like lasttwts is reset to -5364619200.0 every time no new content wasfetched for example if if-modified-since did not produce new twts?
@movq I just observed unexpected old twts coming back.\n\nIt looks like lasttwts is reset to -5364619200.0 every time no new content wasfetched for example if if-modified-since did not produce new twts?
@movq What do you think about this?\n\ndiff --git a/jenny b/jenny\nindex b47c78e..20cf659 100755\n--- a/jenny\n+++ b/jenny\n@@ -278,7 +278,8 @@ def prefill_for(email, reply_to_this, self_mentions):\n def process_feed(config, nick, url, content, lasttwt):\n nick_address, nick_desc = decide_nick(content, nick)\n url_for_hash = decide_url_for_hash(content, url)\n- new_lasttwt = parse('1800-01-01T12:00:00+00:00').timestamp()\n+ # new_lasttwt = parse('1800-01-01T12:00:00+00:00').timestamp()\n+ new_lasttwt = None\n \n for line in twt_lines_from_content(content):\n res = twt_line_to_mail(\n@@ -296,7 +297,7 @@ def process_feed(config, nick, url, content, lasttwt):\n twt_stamp = twt_date.timestamp()\n if lasttwt is not None and lasttwt >= twt_stamp:\n continue\n- if twt_stamp > new_lasttwt:\n+ if not new_lasttwt or twt_stamp > new_lasttwt:\n new_lasttwt = twt_stamp\n \n mailname_new = join(config['maildir_target'], 'new', twt_hash)
@movq What do you think about this?
diff --git a/jenny b/jenny
index b47c78e..20cf659 100755
--- a/jenny
+++ b/jenny
@@ -278,7 +278,8 @@ def prefill_for(email, reply_to_this, self_mentions):
def process_feed(config, nick, url, content, lasttwt):
nick_address, nick_desc = decide_nick(content, nick)
url_for_hash = decide_url_for_hash(content, url)
- new_lasttwt = parse('1800-01-01T12:00:00+00:00').timestamp()
+ # new_lasttwt = parse('1800-01-01T12:00:00+00:00').timestamp()
+ new_lasttwt = None
for line in twt_lines_from_content(content):
res = twt_line_to_mail(
@@ -296,7 +297,7 @@ def process_feed(config, nick, url, content, lasttwt):
twt_stamp = twt_date.timestamp()
if lasttwt is not None and lasttwt >= twt_stamp:
continue
- if twt_stamp > new_lasttwt:
+ if not new_lasttwt or twt_stamp > new_lasttwt:
new_lasttwt = twt_stamp
mailname_new = join(config['maildir_target'], 'new', twt_hash)
@stackeffect Ah, yeah. Stupid mistake. It gets overwritten. Will fix tomorrow.
@stackeffect Ah, yeah. Stupid mistake. It gets overwritten. Will fix tomorrow.
@stackeffect Ah, yeah. Stupid mistake. It gets overwritten. Will fix tomorrow.
@stackeffect Yeah, something along these lines. I think there’s something missing, I’ll have a look tomorrow. 👌
(Haha, will you look at that. Now we’re exchanging diffs over twtxt. I guess the original authors didn’t see *that* coming.)
@stackeffect Yeah, something along these lines. I think there’s something missing, I’ll have a look tomorrow. 👌
(Haha, will you look at that. Now we’re exchanging diffs over twtxt. I guess the original authors didn’t see *that* coming.)
@stackeffect Yeah, something along these lines. I think there’s something missing, I’ll have a look tomorrow. 👌
(Haha, will you look at that. Now we’re exchanging diffs over twtxt. I guess the original authors didn’t see *that* coming.)
@stackeffect Yeah, something along these lines. I think there’s something missing, I’ll have a look tomorrow. 👌\n\n(Haha, will you look at that. Now we’re exchanging diffs over twtxt. I guess the original authors didn’t see *that* coming.)
I merged that branch into main with a fix. It’s almost the same diff that you posted, just a minor edit. Thanks!
I merged that branch into main with a fix. It’s almost the same diff that you posted, just a minor edit. Thanks!
I merged that branch into main with a fix. It’s almost the same diff that you posted, just a minor edit. Thanks!