# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
# 
# Usage:
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users              View list of users and latest twt date.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt                View all twts.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri  View all mentions for uri.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash         View all twts for a conversation subject.
# 
# Options:
#     uri     Filter to show a specific users twts.
#     offset  Start index for quey.
#     limit   Count of items to return (going back in time).
# 
# twt range = 1 20
# self = https://watcher.sour.is/conv/ppt5eja
Seeing "http://ftp" in a URL makes me happy.
Seeing "http://ftp" in a URL makes me happy.
@anth could you elaborate? Also, there is some parsing problem on this one, @xuu and @prologic.
I'm not sure! It feels similar to seeing "~username" in a URL. Part nostalgia, part... impressed at the persistence?~
I'm not sure! It feels similar to seeing "~username" in a URL. Part nostalgia, part... impressed at the persistence?~
@anth Also did you mean to write http://ftp ? 😅 Because @fastidious has a sneaking suspicion (_if you did_) that we might have hit a "parsing" but with yarnd's lextwt parser 😂
@anth Also did you mean to write http://ftp ? 😅 Because @fastidious has a sneaking suspicion (_if you did_) that we might have hit a "parsing" but with yarnd's lextwt parser 😂
Check the raw file. ;-) Yes, "http colon slash slash ftp".
Check the raw file. ;-) Yes, "http colon slash slash ftp".
@anth I was just making sure I did check the raw feed 👌 -- I _think_ @xuu found that on yarnd it's just a schema we don't allow in the HTML sanitizer -- Using bluemonday. The question is should we permit ftp as a linkable scheme? Hmmm 🤔
@anth I was just making sure I did check the raw feed 👌 -- I _think_ @xuu found that on yarnd it's just a schema we don't allow in the HTML sanitizer -- Using bluemonday. The question is should we permit ftp as a linkable scheme? Hmmm 🤔
@prologic maybe I am reading too much into this, but I think @anth meant to say http:// and ftp:// made him happy (that is http:// and ftp://). It is just the way he wrote it that broke the parser.
@fastidious No you're reading it _quite_ correctly I _think_. That's the way I read this Yarn too 👌 I didn't break our Parser, we just don't allow it.
@fastidious No you're reading it _quite_ correctly I _think_. That's the way I read this Yarn too 👌 I didn't break our Parser, we just don't allow it.
I think y'all are missing something. I never used ftp as a schema; I'm saying the "ftp" hostname part with the "http" schema is amusing.
I think y'all are missing something. I never used ftp as a schema; I'm saying the "ftp" hostname part with the "http" schema is amusing.
@anth Oh! 🤦‍♂️ Yeah I _think_ I did mis-read 😂 To be honest I've never really seen FTP served over HTTP -- Or it was so long ago I've forgotten what that was like? 🤔
@anth Oh! 🤦‍♂️ Yeah I _think_ I did mis-read 😂 To be honest I've never really seen FTP served over HTTP -- Or it was so long ago I've forgotten what that was like? 🤔
@prologic I guess it is the same as my https://irc.netbros.com/. IRC itself is a protocol. I mean, things like that are common this days.
@prologic Debian packages immediately come to mind, such as: https://ftp.debian.org/debian/