# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
# 
# Usage:
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users              View list of users and latest twt date.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt                View all twts.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri  View all mentions for uri.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash         View all twts for a conversation subject.
# 
# Options:
#     uri     Filter to show a specific users twts.
#     offset  Start index for quey.
#     limit   Count of items to return (going back in time).
# 
# twt range = 1 7
# self = https://watcher.sour.is/conv/qlkzmjq
@adi Can you explain how you accomplished this feat below?! It's been griwing my nuts:


2022-02-22T12:46:26Z	(#at3pl6q) @<jlj https://twt.nfld.uk/user/jlj> Thanks! We were just discussing that hopes are usually unrealistic and it's a good idea not to hope in general but @<prologic https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt> and @<david https://netbros.com/user/david/twtxt.txt> disagree.


I _was_ suspecting a bug somewhere, but I _think_ this is a case of user error, and I'd like to understand how you manage to do this. I find this impossible...
@adi Can you explain how you accomplished this feat below?! It's been griwing my nuts:


2022-02-22T12:46:26Z	(#at3pl6q) @<jlj https://twt.nfld.uk/user/jlj> Thanks! We were just discussing that hopes are usually unrealistic and it's a good idea not to hope in general but @<prologic https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt> and @<david https://netbros.com/user/david/twtxt.txt> disagree.


I _was_ suspecting a bug somewhere, but I _think_ this is a case of user error, and I'd like to understand how you manage to do this. I find this impossible...
https://twt.nfld.uk/user/jlj is not @jlj 's URI here at all. I'm not even sure how this is possible to get wrong unless you _manually_ typed out the @<jlj ...> full syntax> (_which you can_)
https://twt.nfld.uk/user/jlj is not @jlj 's URI here at all. I'm not even sure how this is possible to get wrong unless you _manually_ typed out the @<jlj ...> full syntax> (_which you can_)
@adi Nevermind, I discovered the bug I was looking for 👌 Now to find out wtf is going on 😳
@adi Nevermind, I discovered the bug I was looking for 👌 Now to find out wtf is going on 😳
@prologic That's good! 😁