<meta name="yarn-uri" context="/path/to/your/twtxt.txt" />
<meta name="yarn-uri" context="/path/to/your/twtxt.txt" />
HEAD https://envs.net/~duriny/
rather than HEAD https://envs.net/
to look for the HTTP Link
header or <link>
tag in the body?
In your specific case (_assuming we went with the
<meta ...>
approach would look something like:
<meta name="twtxt" content="/~:nick/twtxt.txt" />
In your specific case (_assuming we went with the
<meta ...>
approach would look something like:
<meta name="twtxt" content="/~:nick/twtxt.txt" />
I wouldn't be surprised to learn that other such similar community-based hosting services offer similar "directories"and "lookup" mechanisms. I would if I offered such a service (_oh wait 🤦♂️_)
I wouldn't be surprised to learn that other such similar community-based hosting services offer similar "directories"and "lookup" mechanisms. I would if I offered such a service (_oh wait 🤦♂️_)
yarnd
it probably this: try to solve this all locally without any remote communication. If the expansion on the follower list does not result in any match, try again with all the feeds known to this yarnd
instance. Can't see why this won't work at the moment.
I _believe_ this can be done. Think of it this way, @xuu mentions the use of DNS -- Well DNS is what make the "Web" work really...
I _believe_ this can be done. Think of it this way, @xuu mentions the use of DNS -- Well DNS is what make the "Web" work really...
yarnd
is nothing more than an implementation of the specs we're documented with a Web UI. Yes it also has some infra-pods features that "distribute" Twts amongst peers and other such distributes feature. -- But if I were an operator of such a "community host" why can't there be hooks and lookups in place and "automation" that "just works"™?
yarnd
is nothing more than an implementation of the specs we're documented with a Web UI. Yes it also has some infra-pods features that "distribute" Twts amongst peers and other such distributes feature. -- But if I were an operator of such a "community host" why can't there be hooks and lookups in place and "automation" that "just works"™?
yarnd
you're on doesn't have pulled feed X, you're probably not going to reply and thus to mention that feed X, are you? Unless you've come across feed X somewhere else, I give you that. "Why can't others do this and that what I want them to" is not a helpful argument in my opinion. It just makes people turn away at best. As I pointed out different people on a shared server may just want to use completely different URL schemes. And that's absolutely fine. Just think of feeds for different purposes by one and the same author. So the proposal we're having is not going to work (didn't check my mails yet, so maybe sb. came up with an alternative already).
The point I was (very badly) trying to make was about a canonical way of both saying how one can find your feed and resolve it.
The point I was (very badly) trying to make was about a canonical way of both saying how one can find your feed and resolve it.