# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
#
# Usage:
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users View list of users and latest twt date.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt View all twts.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri View all mentions for uri.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash View all twts for a conversation subject.
#
# Options:
# uri Filter to show a specific users twts.
# offset Start index for quey.
# limit Count of items to return (going back in time).
#
# twt range = 1 21
# self = https://watcher.sour.is/conv/salij6a
True better to engineer things yourself, anyhow, I have to drill out these holes bigger, just because of the confusion of words over products.
What happened to keep is simple stupid. KISS
but if we kept things simple stupid I how would the poor little darlings in middle-management have a job? 😂
but if we kept things simple stupid I how would the poor little darlings in middle-management have a job? 😂
but if we kept things simple stupid I how would the poor little darlings in middle-management have a job? 😂
KISS has been my mantra for some years now, and I still have to pull myself up sometimes for being caught up trying to over complicate some solution or falling for the hype around etc etc.
KISS has been my mantra for some years now, and I still have to pull myself up sometimes for being caught up trying to over complicate some solution or falling for the hype around _insert web framework_ etc etc.
KISS has been my mantra for some years now, and I still have to pull myself up sometimes for being caught up trying to over complicate some solution or falling for the hype around _insert web framework_ etc etc.
@prologic Heh exactly! And interesting, I edited my comment and it put it after yours.
@prologic Heh exactly! And interesting, I edited my comment and it put it after yours.
@eldersnake \n\n> And interesting, I edited my comment and it put it after yours.\n\nHmmm since posts are sorted in chronological order, this _technically_ shouldn't happen.\n\nThe way "Edit" works is to nuke your last line in your feed file and re-append the edited content. But it uses the timestamp of the deleted/edited post it just deleted. I smell a bug, just looking at the code, it _should_ be using the exact same timestamp as before? Hmmm 🤔
@eldersnake
> And interesting, I edited my comment and it put it after yours.
Hmmm since posts are sorted in chronological order, this _technically_ shouldn't happen.
The way "Edit" works is to nuke your last line in your feed file and re-append the edited content. But it uses the timestamp of the deleted/edited post it just deleted. I smell a bug, just looking at the code, it _should_ be using the exact same timestamp as before? Hmmm 🤔
@eldersnake
> And interesting, I edited my comment and it put it after yours.
Hmmm since posts are sorted in chronological order, this _technically_ shouldn't happen.
The way "Edit" works is to nuke your last line in your feed file and re-append the edited content. But it uses the timestamp of the deleted/edited post it just deleted. I smell a bug, just looking at the code, it _should_ be using the exact same timestamp as before? Hmmm 🤔
@eldersnake \n\n> And interesting, I edited my comment and it put it after yours.\n\nHmmm since posts are sorted in chronological order, this _technically_ shouldn't happen.\n\nThe way "Edit" works is to nuke your last line in your feed file and re-append the edited content. But it uses the timestamp of the deleted/edited post it just deleted. I smell a bug, just looking at the code, it _should_ be using the exact same timestamp as before? Hmmm 🤔
@prologic Odd! For extra info, the reason I edited is I originally had my "insert web framework" enclosed in arrows (eg. less than and greater than arrows) but putting them in directly made the whole bit of text not even show (I'm guessing they weren't automatically converted to HTML safe > etc).
@prologic Odd! For extra info, the reason I edited is I originally had my "insert web framework" enclosed in arrows (eg. less than and greater than arrows) but putting them in directly made the whole bit of text not even show (I'm guessing they weren't automatically converted to HTML safe > etc).
@eldersnake Right. I'll check that out too. Thanks! Also I confirmed there is a bug here somewhere... I'll try to fix it, but it's bloody hot here today! 🥵
@eldersnake Right. I'll check that out too. Thanks! Also I confirmed there is a bug here somewhere... I'll try to fix it, but it's bloody hot here today! 🥵
@eldersnake Right. I'll check that out too. Thanks! Also I confirmed there is a bug here somewhere... I'll try to fix it, but it's bloody hot here today! 🥵