# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
# 
# Usage:
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users              View list of users and latest twt date.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt                View all twts.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri  View all mentions for uri.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash         View all twts for a conversation subject.
# 
# Options:
#     uri     Filter to show a specific users twts.
#     offset  Start index for quey.
#     limit   Count of items to return (going back in time).
# 
# twt range = 1 23
# self = https://watcher.sour.is/conv/sojctqq
@jlj I could not agree more 😁 I _genuienly_ think so many of us have become too sensitive and judgmental πŸ˜₯ Worse is this whole PC phase many parts of the world are going through πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ
@jlj I could not agree more 😁 I _genuienly_ think so many of us have become too sensitive and judgmental πŸ˜₯ Worse is this whole PC phase many parts of the world are going through πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ
@prologic Yes, exactly. I mean, we were probably always this judgmental; but now we all have a platform to trumpet it from, solicited or otherwise!\n\n@https://tt.vltra.plus/user/laz/twtxt.txt> pointed me to this wonderful quote from Hayek that's particularly relevant here too, I feel:\n> [On true, and false, individualism, one] might even say that the former is a product of an acute consciousness of the limitations of the individual mind which induces an attitude of humility toward the impersonal and anonymous social processes by which individuals help to create things greater than they know, while the latter is the product of an exaggerated belief in the powers of individual reason and of a consequent contempt for anything which has not been consciously designed by it or is not fully intelligible to it.\n\nFrom *Individualism and Economic Order*, circa 1948. I wonder what **he'd** make of the Internet. :-P
One thing my lovely wife pointed out to me this evening on the subject is how we’ve effectively built a way to have honest open conversations without riling each other up πŸ‘Œ
One thing my lovely wife pointed out to me this evening on the subject is how we’ve effectively built a way to have honest open conversations without riling each other up πŸ‘Œ
@jlj Also after re-reading that quote several times 😳 Man that’s some provocative thinking there πŸ€”
@jlj Also after re-reading that quote several times 😳 Man that’s some provocative thinking there πŸ€”
Agreed, @kt84! :-)\n\nI mean, part of that is being a small community of higher than average intelligence, of course... lol! ;-)\n\n**But** I think you deserve lots of credit for building software that has time to reflect built in; I honestly think that's hugely important, and I'm glad that we've preserved it through this rebranding / enhancing.
Yeah I think behind a keyboard and monitor has made people act quite differently as a society towards each other. For example people will be rarely so radical or lean to such political extremes in person, but online is a different matter. I think also this grows exponentially on larger online spaces - the reason why as communities grow they tend to become more 'noisy' and what some may deem 'toxic'. I think we've all seen that in some way or another, on those platforms [1/2]
@prologic Seriously! @laz is gonna get sick of me pinging him on every platform we share, thanking him, but... Well, I just love it! It's on nfld.uk now, for cryin' out loud! :-P Particularly because I spent quite a bit of time reading Hayek over the last few years and came to the conclusion that we really don't share much of a worldview... How wrong I was!
@prologic \nIt is still too early, and too few of us. Give it some time, and your wife might revise her statement. πŸ˜‚
@prologic
It is still too early, and too few of us. Give it some time, and your wife might revise her statement. πŸ˜‚
[2 / 2]...made far worse by platforms such as Facebook etc using algorithms to encourage negativity and conflict.\n\nI think communities such as the ones you find here have a massive advantage of not having those algorithms obviously, but also the nature of the platform (protocol?) is you kind of make your community around you. And the whole experience is more interpersonal (as much as can be in text exchanges) and full of less distractions. I could ramble on but you get it πŸ˜„
@eldersnake I do. And, yup, πŸ’―%.
@jlj Agreed πŸ€—
@jlj Agreed πŸ€—
@eldersnake πŸ’― πŸ‘Œ @quark may not yet appreciate this but the technical and design choices made here on Yarn.social and indeed built upon a very simple but extended Twtxt are very deliberate to all these points πŸ€— Even such things as an active cache and archival process πŸ˜† were deliberate !
@eldersnake πŸ’― πŸ‘Œ @quark may not yet appreciate this but the technical and design choices made here on Yarn.social and indeed built upon a very simple but extended Twtxt are very deliberate to all these points πŸ€— Even such things as an active cache and archival process πŸ˜† were deliberate !
But most importantly of all is the decentralized nature and as @eldersnake put it the community you build around you that forms a part of a bigger community of β€œpods”!
But most importantly of all is the decentralized nature and as @eldersnake put it the community you build around you that forms a part of a bigger community of β€œpods”!
I also do genuinely think that Yarn.social is pretty hard to abuse and quite hard to create β€œnoise” too ☺️
I also do genuinely think that Yarn.social is pretty hard to abuse and quite hard to create β€œnoise” too ☺️
@jlj haha, no problem. No alerts on Yarn.social πŸ™Œ