# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
# 
# Usage:
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users              View list of users and latest twt date.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt                View all twts.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri  View all mentions for uri.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash         View all twts for a conversation subject.
# 
# Options:
#     uri     Filter to show a specific users twts.
#     offset  Start index for quey.
#     limit   Count of items to return (going back in time).
# 
# twt range = 1 27
# self = https://watcher.sour.is/conv/u7pt6oa
A few years ago, I cam across these images (warning: photosensitive epilepsy): https://movq.de/v/4de77da434 This is such a crazy effect! 😵 How does that work? šŸ¤”
A few years ago, I cam across these images (warning: photosensitive epilepsy): https://movq.de/v/4de77da434 This is such a crazy effect! 😵 How does that work? šŸ¤”
A few years ago, I cam across these images (warning: photosensitive epilepsy): https://movq.de/v/4de77da434 This is such a crazy effect! 😵 How does that work? šŸ¤”
So, it’s Chromatic Abberation, but not in a uniform way. It only applies to ā€œhighlightsā€, i.e. pixels/areas that are close to white? šŸ¤”
So, it’s Chromatic Aberration, but not in a uniform way. It only applies to ā€œhighlightsā€, i.e. pixels/areas that are close to white? šŸ¤”
So, it’s Chromatic Aberration, but not in a uniform way. It only applies to ā€œhighlightsā€, i.e. pixels/areas that are close to white? šŸ¤”
So, it’s Chromatic Aberration, but not in a uniform way. It only applies to ā€œhighlightsā€, i.e. pixels/areas that are close to white? šŸ¤”
Ah, no, it’s a temporal effect! Here’s one of the clips with the green channel shifted by 2 frames and blue by 4 frames, resulting in a new clip that pretty much negates the effect: https://movq.de/v/8af68a00ea/1a3GFsA.webm-ca.webm Made using this script: https://www.uninformativ.de/git/bin-pub/file/temporal-chromatic-aberration.html 🄳
Ah, no, it’s a temporal effect! Here’s one of the clips with the green channel shifted by 2 frames and blue by 4 frames, resulting in a new clip that pretty much negates the effect: https://movq.de/v/8af68a00ea/1a3GFsA.webm-ca.webm Made using this script: https://www.uninformativ.de/git/bin-pub/file/temporal-chromatic-aberration.html 🄳
Ah, no, it’s a temporal effect! Here’s one of the clips with the green channel shifted by 2 frames and blue by 4 frames, resulting in a new clip that pretty much negates the effect: https://movq.de/v/8af68a00ea/1a3GFsA.webm-ca.webm Made using this script: https://www.uninformativ.de/git/bin-pub/file/temporal-chromatic-aberration.html 🄳
(And I have a typo in the first twt of this thread, which I can’t really fix now, because it will break threading. Argh. 🄓)
(And I have a typo in the first twt of this thread, which I can’t really fix now, because it will break threading. Argh. 🄓)
(And I have a typo in the first twt of this thread, which I can’t really fix now, because it will break threading. Argh. 🄓)
And here’s the effect applied to a little video I just made: https://movq.de/v/d135bb9e84/MVI_2039.MOV-ca.webm Yes, it’s out of focus, because this works best with blurry images/videos.
And here’s the effect applied to a little video I just made: https://movq.de/v/d135bb9e84/MVI_2039.MOV-ca.webm Yes, it’s out of focus, because this works best with blurry images/videos.
And here’s the effect applied to a little video I just made: https://movq.de/v/d135bb9e84/MVI_2039.MOV-ca.webm Yes, it’s out of focus, because this works best with blurry images/videos.
@movq Waaaahhh, my eyes hurt. Yeah, this is absolutly crazy stuff. ;-) Not sure what's going on, but my Firefox complains about the webm files you twtxted, that they're broken. VLC plays them nicely. Doesn't happen with the linked ones on the HTML page.
@lyse Ah, crap, ffmpeg uses the wrong pixel format by default. šŸ™„ I wish browsers were more robust in that regard …
@lyse Ah, crap, ffmpeg uses the wrong pixel format by default. šŸ™„ I wish browsers were more robust in that regard …
@lyse Ah, crap, ffmpeg uses the wrong pixel format by default. šŸ™„ I wish browsers were more robust in that regard …
Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axK-ieZp1vo // Now with ā€œtemporal chromatic aberrationā€ (if that’s even what it’s called), green channel 1 frame, blue channel 2 frames: https://movq.de/v/3acc2e15bd/wave-tca1-sound.webm // Green 2 frames, blue 4 frames: https://movq.de/v/3acc2e15bd/wave-tca2-sound.webm // The part around 1:06 is great!
Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axK-ieZp1vo // Now with ā€œtemporal chromatic aberrationā€ (if that’s even what it’s called), green channel 1 frame, blue channel 2 frames: https://movq.de/v/3acc2e15bd/wave-tca1-sound.webm // Green 2 frames, blue 4 frames: https://movq.de/v/3acc2e15bd/wave-tca2-sound.webm // The part around 1:06 is great!
Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axK-ieZp1vo // Now with ā€œtemporal chromatic aberrationā€ (if that’s even what it’s called), green channel 1 frame, blue channel 2 frames: https://movq.de/v/3acc2e15bd/wave-tca1-sound.webm // Green 2 frames, blue 4 frames: https://movq.de/v/3acc2e15bd/wave-tca2-sound.webm // The part around 1:06 is great!
In general, it works best when shiny objects are moving and the rest remains more or less fixed.
In general, it works best when shiny objects are moving and the rest remains more or less fixed.
In general, it works best when shiny objects are moving and the rest remains more or less fixed.
@movq Very nice! Beautiful imagery and sound.