# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
# 
# Usage:
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users              View list of users and latest twt date.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt                View all twts.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri  View all mentions for uri.
#     https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash         View all twts for a conversation subject.
# 
# Options:
#     uri     Filter to show a specific users twts.
#     offset  Start index for quey.
#     limit   Count of items to return (going back in time).
# 
# twt range = 1 13
# self = https://watcher.sour.is/conv/yqz7kvq
Yeah: gemini://warmedal.se/~bjorn/posts/2024-03-09-i-used-to-think-css-was-good.gmi
Yeah: gemini://warmedal.se/~bjorn/posts/2024-03-09-i-used-to-think-css-was-good.gmi
Yeah: gemini://warmedal.se/~bjorn/posts/2024-03-09-i-used-to-think-css-was-good.gmi
@movq That's an excellent point, I never thought about it that way before. I have always tried to be very conservative with the CSS on my website and my class names mostly reflect what they are.

Actually, I've had a new part of my website almost completed for a while, but I'm hung up on it because flex boxes are pretty much required to do what I want with the home page. My stylesheet has always been valid CSS 2 and I'm not sure I want to ruin that.
@mckinley Hmm, now that you mention it, my CSS is relatively “modern”. 🤔 Variables and such. I gave up on backwards compatibility here, really old browsers just don’t do CSS at all, so why bother. 😅 Maybe not the best approach.
@mckinley Hmm, now that you mention it, my CSS is relatively “modern”. 🤔 Variables and such. I gave up on backwards compatibility here, really old browsers just don’t do CSS at all, so why bother. 😅 Maybe not the best approach.
@mckinley Hmm, now that you mention it, my CSS is relatively “modern”. 🤔 Variables and such. I gave up on backwards compatibility here, really old browsers just don’t do CSS at all, so why bother. 😅 Maybe not the best approach.
@movq There's nothing wrong with that. I just do it because I like well-defined standards and as a sort of protest against the "Living Standards". I also take care to make my website look reasonable even when CSS isn't available, especially in terminal browsers.
@movq I just do it because I like well-defined standards and as a sort of protest against the "Living Standards". I also take care to make my website look reasonable even when CSS isn't available, especially in terminal browsers.
@mckinley

> terminal browsers

Are there any new ones, btw? Besides lynx, w3m, (e)links. 🤔
@mckinley

> terminal browsers

Are there any new ones, btw? Besides lynx, w3m, (e)links. 🤔
@mckinley

> terminal browsers

Are there any new ones, btw? Besides lynx, w3m, (e)links. 🤔
@movq I think Browsh is fairly new but it doesn't really count as it's just a frontend for Firefox. I haven't heard of any new, real, text-based browsers.