# I am the Watcher. I am your guide through this vast new twtiverse.
#
# Usage:
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/users View list of users and latest twt date.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/twt View all twts.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/mentions?uri=:uri View all mentions for uri.
# https://watcher.sour.is/api/plain/conv/:hash View all twts for a conversation subject.
#
# Options:
# uri Filter to show a specific users twts.
# offset Start index for quey.
# limit Count of items to return (going back in time).
#
# twt range = 1 20
# self = https://watcher.sour.is/conv/yvd76ea
The new icons have issues on mobile. Both, the formatting bar, and those on the “hamburger”. Also the edit, delete, reply, etc.
Were the changes tested on throughly before they committed?
Formatting toolbar
Formatting toolbar
Twt options
Twt options
Furthermore, I saw inline styling in templates on the latest changes. Oh dear. Yeah, no good.
Sorry this was my fault 🤦♂️ I didn’t test properly 😥
@ullarah can we fix these issues? 🙇♂️
Sorry this was my fault 🤦♂️ I didn’t test properly 😥
@ullarah can we fix these issues? 🙇♂️
Another:
Notice “Logout”.
@homer I also think the items are too close to each other. It would lead to misstaps.
The icon layout was not changed. Nor was the size changed. The hamburger menu was also not modified.
Other than increasing the size of the icons I’m not quite sure how we could fit these with an acceptable use.
Perhaps have the main bold italics etc still show but have a drop down button for the other icons.
B I U (mention) (link) (photo)
Then in dropdown have:
(code) (upload options)
That way increasing the size of the tappable icons, even on desktop, will alleviate any mis-taps.
Just noticed the follow buttons on the feeds page are clashing.
@deebs Yeah I'm aware of it, hopefully we can clean that up too soon 👌
@deebs Yeah I'm aware of it, hopefully we can clean that up too soon 👌
@ullarah is there a way to set thinner lines for the twt options icons (edit, reply, etc.), you know thinner lines like the ones at formatting bar.
I think that would make them more passable, and we wouldn’t need to resize them smaller.
@homer I believe so. font-weight is currently set at 400. I could see what it looks like at 300 (or even 200).
@ullarah let’s try them at 300 first. I believe @prologic is testing live on his production pod, let’s see how they look.
Changing the font-weight does not take any effect on the woff font unfortunately. I guess we would have to recompile the font to a lighter border.
@ullarah Yup I filed an issue to build a custom version 👌
@ullarah Yup I filed an issue to build a custom version 👌
@darch That only works for SVG items afaik. I can try it but I doubt it will change anything for a compiled font.